So many of the extreme and absurd agendas of the World Controller Class, aka the Oligarch Overlords, aka the Zionist Banksters, can be seen as enacting a world depopulation plan.
Thank you. I saw different scores on IQ from different sources. The IQ of Jews in Israel is very likely to be lower than the IQ of Jews in the US, for interesting reasons.
The IQ of American Jews seem that way because of hyperbole, ie Einstein. The movie Oppenheimer is another hyped up Jew porn production. Neither of the two were 'experimental' scientist as with most Jews. ― Nikola Tesla “Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ”
Agree. Jewish IQ is complicated, since a "brain drain" occurred when Jews sent their more intelligent sons who proved themselves in study of the Talmud to the West, raising the IQ of more Western Jews while lowering the IQ of Eastern Jews. Overall Jews do appear to have a similar IQ as Whites, on a bell curve. One factor to consider is the extent to which any race produces super-high IQ genuises, who can have large impacts on society and history. Trump claims to be one, but I doubt it. Same with Jews claiming genius status for Einstein. I agree with you, that is probably Jewish self-promotion fraud. We could probably add Oppenheimer, Freud, Boaz and many other Jewish "scientists." Tesla appears to have been a for-real genius.
and IQ's are not necessarily correlated to having common sense...how many geniuses gladly got the clot shot...or still believe the moon landing hoax or the official 9/11 story or the holohoax story...or that vaccines are safe and effective...I'm no "genius" but I am able to use common sense and logical reasoning
Excellent essay, but this sentence would need more elaboration."Over the decades the Soviet Union endured until 1990 with extensive U.S support, an estimated 70 million were killed." Unless you are speaking of the support the Soviets received during WW2.
You are absolutely right. I knew when I wrote it that this needed more elaboration--or justification--since it is so astonishing a claim. Everyone knows the US and the USSR were in a bitter conflict throughout the Cold War, and any claim the US "supported" the USSR during that time seems absurd. Many know now, however, that the US hugely supported the USSR during WWII, especially with the Lend/Lease Act worked by Communist Jew traitors in the US Treasury Department. But too few know the US support to an immense amount continued after the war and throughout the Cold War period.
I refer you to the book Zionist Wall Street by George Washington Armstrong, and two essays in the previous edition of the Barnes Review July/August 2023: "American Support for Stalin Before WWII," and "American Support for Stalin During and After WWII," both by John Wear.
I suspect the nuke plan was theatrical propaganda.
One motive for the US supporting the Soviets after WWII and throughout the "Cold War" is the utility of creating an perceived enemy. The benefit to both would be large, and not just hugely expanded defense budgets. The Jewish Totalitarian Capitalists and the Jewish Totalitarian Communists have always worked together in mutual support to advance the Zionist plan for world domination.
One of the more astonishing history from the Armstrong book was the fact that the US had supplied over 50% of the funding, materials, planning and building of the world's largest manufacturing plant of any kind in the USSR. It covered almost 40 acres, and it main production was in vehicles of all kinds: trucks, cars, motorcycles... At the time this plant was near peak capacity producing trucks, the US and the USSR were supposedly at war in Korea. The USSR was supplying war materials to the N Koreans using these trucks that the plant was manufacturing. Do we comprehend? The US had supported the infrastructure that allowed the Soviets to supply arms and war materials to what was said to be the US' enemy, the N Koreans! I think this was another case of the Jews playing both sides in a manufactured conflict. We may be seeing the same in Ukraine/Russia today.
"I suspect the nuke plan was theatrical propaganda."
Reno: I don't think so. That plan was hidden for many decades, and propaganda that you hide is not propaganda.
"One motive for the US supporting the Soviets after WWII and throughout the "Cold War" is the utility of creating an perceived enemy."
Reno: You don't need to support a gigantic and powerful country on your hit list to make it a perceived enemy. Turning the MSM lose is all that is needed. Here is a quote by Oswald Spengler, around 1920. "Four weeks of media campaign and everyone knows who the enemy is."
"The benefit to both would be large, and not just hugely expanded defense budgets."
Rerno: The huge defense budget is a given once the MSM tells you who the enemy is. Claiming that the enemy is much more powerful than it is will do. That can't be challenged by the masses.
"............................the US had supplied over 50% of the funding, materials, planning and building of the world's largest manufacturing plant of any kind in the USSR. It covered almost 40 acres, and it main production was in vehicles of all kinds: trucks, cars, motorcycles."
Reno: My guess "............the funding, materials, planning and building..." took place during WW2. The plant could very well have been finished after the war. You may have the answer, since I have not read the book.
Yes, propaganda must be publicly shared to be effective. Since in my view nuclear bomb technology was never invented, any threat of nuking Russia at any time must be propaganda. It is more fear appeal. Just like a deadly "novel" invisible coronavirus.
The British and French considered conventional bombing of the Baku oil fields even before WWII or at the latest early in the war before Barbarossa. That would most likely have won Germany and the Axis powers the war. Alas.
The USSR was certainly gigantic, but it was not powerful until the US funded it, transferred technology to it, helped organize its economy and manufacturing sector, including transferring and reassembling entire factories, rail road systems, refineries, mining operations and all the rest. The USSR was extraordinarily backward compared to other industrial nations at the time, and the US helped it catch up to serve as a suitable boogey man nation to drive the Cold War. Which was loaded with nuclear scares, pushed by the mentors of Klaus Schwab, Jews Herman Kahn and Henry Kissinger. But no nuclear bomb ever exploded (because there were none).
The huge defense budget always has to be justified by some perceived enemy, and if none of sufficient size and scariness exists, then it must be created, real or imagined or both. After 1990 it became "radical Islamic terrorists," and now it is "White supremacist terrorists," neither of which exist to any sufficient degree compared to the Zionist power. 911 justified the "war on terror" and C-ville and J6 justifies the war on Whites.
In the Cold War, the concept of the "missile gap" was used to re-inject huge sums of money into the MI complex. Whether the Soviets really had superior missile technology to the US is suspect, since the US supplied the Soviets' missile tech. So I agree with you the justification can be fabricated falsely. In the early 2000s Bush Sr and former CIA Director Baker were lobbyists for the arms industry while Bush Jr was President, all aimed at Israel's perceived enemies in the Middle East.
May I encourage you to buy a copy of Zionist Wall Street by Armstrong? I can't find the passage on the truck plant, and the book has no index. My recollection was that the plant was built after WWII but before the Korean War. Still, US support to the USSR continued long after WWII and even long after Korea.
Thank you for your quick reply. I have read the view before that nuclear technology was never invented. This appeared preposterous to me in the light of well documented nuclear explosion tests by different countries. Since I have not read anything other than that nuclear technology does not exist, I obviously wonder on what evidence this assertion is based. What would be the motive for different countries of playing along, particularly the Soviet Union, who could have called the bluff. Do you remember when Obama took power, he said he would declassify all WW2 documents. There are still tons of documents classified. Needless to say, there was no follow up, and I have not seen this mentioned by anyone since. Are you aware of that?
Karl, as usual, I agree with your thesis (in this case, genocidal elites) but not your conclusion that Jews are pulling the strings. Nobody is more aggravated about the brainwashed leftist Jews than we freedom-loving Jews (I'm quite disappointed to learn that Merrick Garland is Jewish), but to propose that Arab migration is a Jewish plot makes zero sense. Even the most anti-Israel Palestinian-loving communist Jew knows better than to invite high-testosterone Islamists into their city or country! And certainly the very principles of Zionism are antithetical to the strategy of expanding the footprint of Arab influence.
It's been a while since I've commented on one of your posts, but I've been thinking a lot about our prior discussions. Although I do think you demonstrate a confirmation bias against Jews that blinds you to the totality of genocidal elites who are our common enemy, and also blinds you to the important work of the many anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews, I have to concede that there are indeed far too many Jews who are on the wrong side.
A while ago, you suggested that the only way to make it clear that it's "not all Jews" would be for right-thinking Jews to start denouncing our wayward tribesmen. After careful consideration, I believe you are correct. Interestingly enough, the Bible is full of examples when Jewish leaders have done just this. This is a topic that I need to give further thought to.
Hello Lex. I always welcome your astute and informed comments. I highly value your perspective as a Jewish man yourself, and find further insights in our debates.
I acknowledge it seems counter-intuitive and counter-productive for Jews to be promoting Arab mass migration out of the Middle East and into White Western nations. Still, it might be in Israel's interests to enact a form of "brain drain," or in this case a young male militant drain from Israel's enemies in the region, such as Syria, Iran, Lebanon and elsewhere, by dumping them into White Western nations. Also, some Jews have begun to notice that increasing numbers of Arab Muslims in White Western nations where Jews project so much power could create an internal threat to that Jewish power, and have begun to curtail such migration.
As always, this sub-topic is more complex than either of us on our polarized positions portray.
This seemed a good summary: "...many Jews firmly believe that by flooding White Europe with violent Muslims, White Europeans — the Jews’ historical enemy — would become so distracted by these new invaders that they wouldn’t notice that it was the Jews themselves who were the true destroyers..."
Still, these are all a few years old at least. But even in 2018 Jews were considering the wisdom of importing Arab Muslim men "extremists" into White Western nations Jews control.
There is a lot more on this sub-topic and I haven't readily found any on post 2020 concerns of Jews for Arab Muslim presence in their migration waves. I trust you can find some in your sources, especially Jewish sources (and I don't mean main stream media which is certainly Jewish, but such outlets meant for Jewish readers/viewers such as JTA, Haaretz, The Forward, or your choice). Jews have even expressed concern for the "antisemitic" attitudes of African blacks, S Am mestizos, and other racial types that Jews bring into White Western nations, who resent noticing that Jews, far from being a fellow persecuted, discriminated-against minority, are actually much more among the wealthy and powerful.
You say: "I do think you demonstrate a confirmation bias against Jews that blinds you to the totality of genocidal elites who are our common enemy, and also blinds you to the important work of the many anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews..."
I've addressed before this misperception you appear to persist in holding about my views. I've acknowledged that the totality of genocidal elites who are our common enemy are Not All Jews, yet choose to focus on the Jewish representation because it is so under-represented and even obscured otherwise. In fact, naming the culprits as Jesuits, British aristocracy, WASPs, "corporations," "technocrats," "globalists," "chicoms," "neo-cons," and so on mostly serves to redirect proper blame from Jews onto distractions. Not entirely, since some of these factions participate in what you call genocidal elites, but overwhelmingly it serves to obscure the Jewish role, which in my view is predominant today. That is why I have chosen to represent the Jewish component more directly: too few others do, including you.
As for "blinds you to the important work of the many anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews," I address this in the first chapter of my book Covert Covid Culprits, Not All Jews!. I name groups such as Breaking the Silence, and individuals such as Gilad Atzmon, Benjamin Freedman and Paul Eisen among others. Perhaps you mean anti-communist Jews at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution, and if so then that is a sub-topic on which I am not well researched, and welcome your knowledge. I know some Zionist Jews at the time were opposed to Communism, and even proposed to ally with the National Socialist Germans against USSR, on behalf of the dream of Israel. Still, the Zionist Jews were just as authoritarian as the Communists, and just as mass murderous, given the later Nakbah and even other terrorism the Zionist Jews inflicted even on other Jews (SS Patria, King David Hotel and others I document in Chapter 3, Jewish "Anti-semitism.") Churchill wrote about it in 1920 in his newspaper article, "Bolshevism vs. Zionism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." Why? Was Churchill Jewish on his mother's side? If so, another mass murdering authoritarian war monger Jew.
I respect that you can consider the value in something I have proposed. I reveal that I am not "anti-semitic" in the simplistic propaganda sense of hating all Jews just because they are Jews (an absurdity for anyone), because I welcome "good" Jews such as you appear to be in our movement against what you have called the genocidal elite, and I sometimes call the World Controller Class, the Oligarch Overlords, and within them the Jewish Power Elite. Hitler accepted at least half-Jews into the Wehrmacht, known as Mishclings, and I welcome "good" Jews (carefully vetted) into our self-defense efforts against our common enemy of humanity.
I'm interested in seeing what examples in the Bible you will cite. Moses directed the Levite clan to slaughter members of other Israelite clans, and even other Levites, after he caught them worshiping the golden calf idol. This is more an example of the grotesque fratricidal nature of Jews and their obsession with egomaniacal religious jealousy and control than a good example for how Jews today can oppose their kindred among the Jewish Power Elite, but I may be wrong and it could be a good example. The Jewish Power Elite worships the god of Mammon and demonic entities such as Moloch, Baphomet and Lucifer, so perhaps a response to such idolatry is appropriate from "good" Jews.
Please share any examples from the Bible (Torah) you think indicative, and I welcome your further thoughts.
Thanks for those articles, Karl. Apparently, I underestimated just how suicidal and self-loathing the suicidal, self-loathing leftist Jews are. I'm not sure you can imagine how frustrating it is to see a contingent of your own people working with passion and dedication towards goals that are completely contrary to your interests (and, indeed, survival). If they want to sacrifice themselves to their false gods, that's their choice, but I strongly resent them trying to take me with them!
Speaking of false gods, I want to address your mention of "grotesque fratricidal nature of Jews and their obsession with egomaniacal religious jealousy and control." I can see why you might have that impression, but let me share a different perspective.
Within the Jewish religion, monotheism is the prime directive. The first commandment is "You shall have no other gods before Me." Note that this does not contradict the EXISTENCE of other gods, but merely prohibit Jews from worshipping them instead of our God. While this has some interesting supernatural connotations, the main idea is that things like money, sex, authority and government should not be given higher priority than religious observance. Thus, while the gentile world tends to look at Jewish focus on financial success as immoral (or at least superficial), within Jewish culture, the accumulation of wealth is considered a moral good, because money allows you to do things that are in service of God.
That's in theory.
In practice, just as in Mosaic times, there are Jews who will turn from God and worship money, sex, authority, or whatever other Golden Calf is presented to them at the first opportunity. And, just as in the Bible, this is rightly perceived as a threat to the survival of the entire people. "If your right hand offends you, cut it off." What you perceive as fratricidal fanaticism is more accurately considered purging traitors from an army. Either you are for God, or you are for Mammon. There is no in-between.
To bring it full circle, the example of Jews advocating for mass Arab immigration is a perfect example of how those members of the tribe who worship false gods - in this case, the leftist ideology - constitute a threat to the entire tribe. I would argue that Jews like Jeffrey Epstein, who abandon morality in order to curry favor with the genocidal elites, are much the same. People like Rachelle Walensky and Merrick Garland are, in my opinion, probably "useful idiots" that are used as proxies by people with greater influence; I'll give them the benefit of the doubt that they're brainwashed and actually believe they're doing the right thing. Of course, I could be wrong.
To end on a happier note, I'll answer your question about anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews. I'm not talking about Bolshevik history, I'm referring to influential thinkers such as Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman, Murray Rothbard, Ivan Illich, and others who vehemently and persuasively informed the general public about the dangers of collectivism and totalitarianism.
For a bit of forgotten history, look into the American Jewish League Against Communism. This group (which included Senator McCarthy's lawyer Roy Cohn among its founders) not only forcefully condemned Marxist-Leninist philosophy, but denounced by name those Jewish leaders who supported it.
I will have to get back to a reply later, but for now I will make a few notes to remind me: Roy Cohn was a vile wretched evil Jew who organized child raping blackmail rings and was a Jewish organized crime attorney. If he opposed Communism, it was only so he could espouse Jewish organized crime power, which included the Jewish totalitarian capitalists and Zionist banksters. Perhaps this is why Cohn was a mentor to the Jewish organized crime syndicate's future president, Donald Trump.
To you point, I once had a copy of the Charter of the International Jewish Anti-Zionist League, which I can no longer find. The diversity of perspectives among different kinds of Jews can be remarkable, including Jews opposed to Zionism. So I recognize your view.
As we can see in my comment below on Voluntarism vs. National Socialism, for Jews to be advocating for Libertarianism is to be advocating for only one side of the equation while leaving out the other. Was Rand Jewish? Her real name was something else. These Jewish Libertarians certainly warned the public about the dangers of collectivism and totalitarianism, but they not only failed to warn us about the dangers of laissez faire individualist capitalism, they celebrated it. This was a great benefit to the Jewish banksters and their private profiteering operations, including arms dealing, drug dealing, world-wide prostitution, the slave trade (including Whites), and certainly legitimate industry and commerce too, including loaning currency to entire nation-states at interest and taxing the populations to replay the interest on the debt, while controlling their domestic policies and programs to inflict cultural degeneracy and controlling their media/entertainment apparatus for the same objective.
Libertarian Jews warned against totalitarian communism, but advocated for totalitarian capitalism. Only a National Socialist/Fascist government finds the balance and fusion of both. But Libertarian Jews placed National Socialism/Fascism in the same category as totalitarian Communism, thereby demonizing it and ensuring that their individualist-only capitalism would be free to exploit and oppress the nations. Some including NS leaders call this Plutocracy, the rule of money. It is certainly dominant over the US and most of the West today, where government is simply that which Jewish money buys.
Are the crazy extremist leftist Jews any better than the far-right extremist Jews such as US Zionist neo-cons and the Likudniks in Israel?
Jeffrey Epstein WAS (possibly still is) the genocidal elite. Some of them curried favor with him. Except I think their child raping activities were much more than blackmail, but full-on Jewish Ritual Murder which has been a proven legal and historical phenomenon since the 1100s in Europe. This was not done by Epstein/Wexner/Maxwell (Hoch) for blackmail, but as part of the evil rituals along the levels of the pyramid of power, including Cremation of Care (eradication of the capacity for empathy), affirmation of Jewish supremacy, and adrenochrome addiction.
The dichotomy between far-left and far-right is largely an artificial one, as I'm sure you know. From the perspective of human rights, health, and happiness, the question is not really what KIND of government, but what DEGREE of government. Both the left and the right tend quickly and inevitably toward cronyism, corruption, and authoritarianism, which is why the only moral position is the libertarian one.
As far as I can tell, most of the policies you advocate for fall into this category, as you are (to the best of my understanding) essentially proposing that those who are attracted to white nationhood be able to form and live in such a nation. This is more or less a "voluntaryist" philosophy, in that you're not advocating for the genocide or oppression of any other people, you're simply stating that you should be able to live as you see fit, without interference from others.
I recognize some validity to the left-right dichotomy, but less to its divide. That is certainly in degree artificially created. We have news of a fierce left-right divide in Israel at the moment, and I don't imagine either of us would say it is exclusively artificial; it must have some ideological validity.
I fundamentally disagree with you that Degree of government is what matters, not kind. That is a common right-wing perception--"less government, low taxes, free market forces"--but there is a 3rd Position. A National Socialist and Fascist government more generally is a fusion of the best of left and right, while leaving out the worst. It is authoritarian without being cronyist or corrupt. It regulates the economy for the benefit of the people and nation without either owning the economy itself (Communism) or leaving it completely free to become corrupt and destructive (libertarian capitalism). A National Socialist government is the functioning fusion of individualism and collectivism, which if we think about it, it must be to be good government. The choice between individualism or collectivism is a false one. The answer is both.
In my understanding, Voluntarism is anarchism = no leadership. I had troubles with young men in an Voluntarist Freedom Cell when I began to share with them eugenics principles. Did we make a decision whether to allow me to stay in the group on Voluntarist principles? No, they contacted the "leaders" of Voluntarism Derek Broze and John Bush, who issued the decree that I was to be expelled from the group for blasphemous thinking. LOL Some Voluntarists, they went straight up the hierarchy for their decision. In short, leaderless human groups are impossible and counter-natural. Much better to identify the natural leaders and grant them leadership power over the nation and people for the good of all.
"not advocating for the genocide or oppression of any other people, simply stating that you should be able to live as you see fit, without interference from others," is in my view not voluntarism, but racialism (when applied to ethno-states). And it is definitely not White Supremacism, but rather Racialism again, which says each racial type should be allowed to live among their own and work out their own racial destiny, without interference and without pressure to cater to, harbor, rescue, finance, school, uplift or advocate for any other race. Only their own.
One interesting aspect of this history is that the lives of Black Africans, especially the women and children, were far better in terms of quality of life on Southern plantations than they were back in their native African tribes. But that's getting too specific. Generally, Voluntarism/Anarchism believes in no leaders, because leaders are by nature corrupt and exploitative and oppressive, while National Socialism believes in ultimate leadership authority, because leaders can be by nature responsible, accountable, and devoted to the well-being of people and nation both, much more than any others in the population. Voluntarism has the tendency to promote the least capable into decision making power (as does majority voting), while National Socialism has the tendency to promote the most capable.
Why do keep peddling the crap about low IQ of Africans? I worked in Papua New Guinea as a medical student and saw that the people there thought as well as Whites did. There were the dumb and the clever, but as they usually did not know English would score about 20 on an IQ test. By suggesting that IQ differences are genetically-based - the normal unstated presumption in the West - you maintain old prejudices that the Jew-Zios readily feed upon to justify the depopulation agenda by demonizing Whites, e.g. the Southern Poverty Law Centre. As for Israeli IQ - if they keep getting the COVID jabs they will lucky to reach 80. Presumably this is intended in order to make them trigger-happy so as to kill the unjabbed COVID-variant-bearing Palestinians!
I present the data derived from race-adjusted IQ test results. And because the history shows the African blacks on their own never invented the wheel. How can anyone "see" that one race of people "thought as well" as another race? IQ tests measure specific cognitive capacities, not cultural norms, social group think or "common sense." I would think IQ tests would be language-adjusted.
No, the "normal" unstated presumption in the West now is that IQ is entirely environmental and no racial influence exists. Further, it is Whitey's fault that black IQ is low. But the Bell Curve by Murray (and his deceased co-author) shows race certainly contributes a inherited component to IQ. But this is now verboten to say or even think. We think it here at Taboo Truth.
How does maintaining that race contributes a component to IQ justify the Jewish depopulation agenda against Whites? Actually, race IQ reality should justify Black depop, not White.
As always, though we have heard much news out of Israel regarding their almost total vax saturation, Jews lie and we cannot believe any of it. Besides, Israeli Jews are already trigger-happy toward Palestinians and vax damage will only make it harder to perfect their aim in shooting Palestinians promoting their Right of Return in the eyes and legs to cripple them. If Israeli Jews are really fully vaxed with Pfizer genetic poison, and not placebos or hardly at all, they will be lucky to reach 40. Or 2026. Still, Israel continues to desperately try and get Jews to move into Israel, so why would they slaughter off so many already there? Are they planning to abandon Israel and shift their Jewish goyim to Ukraine after Blackrock rebuilds the place as the first example of a Great Reset panopticon digital dictatorship nation?
One doesn't even need to utilize IQ studies on race to draw some of the same conclusions! The greatest, most revolutionary, forward-forming scientific and technological inventions have sprouted from the minds of European men: jet propulsion/airplane, internal combustion engine/automobile, computer, telephone, telegraph, steam engine, printing press, cinema, eyeglasses, wireless communications/internet, electricity/light bulb, train, bicycle, and even civil liberties/government. I could add countless others; not to say that other races haven't provided any great inventions- they have!
The history of the negro, on the other hand, is absent and destitute of any inventions of major impact. Having had most of the whole Sub-Saharan continent of Africa to themselves for numerous generations, yet the negro couldn't find a way to invent even the wheel or develop complex agriculture beyond localized husbandry and the fallow system.
Even Hegel, in his 'Philosophy of History,' explains (see link below) how the negro is the personification of primitiveness and backwards development and that, for centuries in Africa, slavery, whether to himself or the land, was his "absolute condition." It was only in his encounter with Europeans that helped the negro liberate his condition partially, and introduce him to a "consciousness of freedom."
Can we make an educated guess on how many Jews it takes to rule the world? Maybe that could start a joke contest. Funniest answer wins a foreskin restoration.
If there is a fixed number that has to be maintained, I'd say 10. They call it a minyan. But since the Elders are number obsessed, they've got plenty of other candidates. Isn't 20 the number of letters in their holy alphabet? Can't go wrong w/ 6 either.
I'd like to see them deported to Israel. Sucks for the Pals, I know. But should it become a realistic possibility, a renewed alliance w/ the Arab nations would accompany the Final Exodus as a matter of course and that would put a shiver into their shekels.
You make a good point about Jews overdoing things. The 5 Dancing Israelis being an important recent example. They do overplay their hand w/ some regularity. But since they control msm, they just as regularly get away w/ it.
Altho the Tribe's been historically evicted over 100 times (and comes back when memory fades or money is needed) when was the last time a country gave them the boot? 19th century? 18th? Nor can it have been from a democracy. Must have been from monarchy or some type of authoritarian regime. I think that's our only chance. The sheep will not rise up on their own; won't vote them out. It's not in their nature. They're lambs not wolves.
Indeed, what the Chabad Lubavitcher Jewish Zelensky and the Chabad Lubavitcher Jewish Putin really mean when they both say they are fighting 'Nazis' on the other side is that they are both exterminating white Christians, Gentiles in general, including by suiciding the Gentile peoples that they now control themselves by unneccessarily involving them in combat against each other according to the earlier directive of the late chief Chabad Lubavitcher Rabbi Menachem Schneeson that a war must be made to occur in Ukraine with Russia to 'end the line of the Slavs' there in order that millions of Israeli Jews will then be able to move into vacated lands there when the time comes for Israeli Jews to jump ship from present day Israel (14 million Ukrainians have also fled Ukraine while 500,000 others are thought to have been sacrificed in the fighting by Zelensky).
Thus, we are indeed, all 'eternally Nazis' to the Jews, and always have been as far as they are concerned of course, as they mean to plant the lot of us and always have done from the very start.
They thoroughly mean to conquer the entire planet and ultimately to physically exterminate every single last Gentile on the entire planet so as to have it totally to themselves, their scriptures say just that and their rabbis today say exactly that in numerous videos that I show on my site. The Jewish hive mindset is dangerously subnormal and pathologically insane despite their expertise in certain areas, a lethal threat against the entire planet.
Interesting interpretation. I have read that Putin expelled the Jewish Oligarchs, but placated the Chabad Jews in Russia. They said they control 50% of Russia's economy now. But Putin is not himself Chabad, is he? I've heard he was raised by Jews next door when his parents were not home after he came home from school as a boy. Hard to know what's true. It does appear that both Putin and Zelensky/his Jewish handlers are prolonging the war unnecessarily to increase attrition. They are having enough trouble keeping and getting enough Jews into Israel, they might not be able to steal and colonize another region such as Ukraine both. But to shift the Israeli population to Ukraine would be an immense undertaking. They would still want to hold onto Israel because the Belt & Road is aimed to lead there, and it is the center of the McKinder map for world control. Just yesterday I had the insight that the Belt & Road is being established partially to increase the floods of Asians and Arabs and Africans too into Europe to complete the destruction of Amalek. The Road is a migrant road.
Thankyou for your reply. It is the literal fact of the matter. 80% of all rabbis in Russia are Chabad Lubavitchers, they have not been expelled, they control the UN and US with the Noahide Laws having been officially accepted by the UN and US for future physical implementation under UN-intended future Jewish one world government (mass genocidal criminal terrorist dictatorship) they have openly stated in video recorded speeches at mass meetings of their own members that they control 100% of political affairs in both Russia and Ukraine, the videos are still available I think on Renegade Tribune of them saying this, I had them on my old site at WordPress till my entire site was suddenly deleted irretrievably by TPTB. We will see the 'reasonable', 'progressive', 'friendly' Jews show their real colours then when they celebrate the victory of the Jews, you will not see a single Jew of these 'friendly Jew' types stand and fight alongside the Gentiles against the NWO Jewish-controlled forces when they go into full military mode, though various forms of lethal aggression are already being employed against Gentiles by Jewish-controlled agencies that most people cannot even comprehend in all kinds of sneaky ways that most do not even suspect.
Putin has been video-recorded and photographed at a number of different venues at different political events wearing a Chabad Lubavitcher red thread on his wrist, indicating that he himself is a Chabad Lubavitcher member, I have an article showing Putin doing this repeatedly on my present site, yet the Talmud states clearly that all Christians are to be killed by the Jews, so what kind of Christian can Putin be? He is a despicable fake.
He is fanatical at lying that the holocaust really happened, and is a fanatical defender of Judaism and a fanatical supporter of Israel, not a genuine Christian, he has had holocaust denial in Russia made a criminal offence and he is an alumnus of the WEF under the Jew Klaus Schwab just as Zelensky himself is, they are all playing the same WEF game for Israel while pretending to be on opposing sides.
The Jewish game is to get Gentiles controlled by them to kill each other under the impression they are fighting to preserve their nations, but they are all being ritually sacrificed to satisfy the ever-bloodthirsty Jews.
Isaiah 19:2 KJV -
"And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother, and every one against his neighbour; city against city, and kingdom against kingdom."
Obviously, only one Egyptian kingdom could possibly have existed under one single leader at any one time back then, thus 'kingdom against kingdom' here is cryptic for 'Gentile nation against Gentile nation', and 'Egyptian' is cryptic for Gentile.
Will blowback be the Jewish undoing? It doesn't seem so, not so far anyway. Their racial/genetic population has been constantly taking hits from their various destructive agendas thru the ages. But control over gentiles has never been stronger. They have us in a submission lock, the classic sleeper hold, and continue to apply pressure while we sputter and twitch in response.
I don't think weakening demographics will ever reach a critical mass whereby they'll lose control due to diminished numbers. Already they rule w/ only .2%. At this point they could hold us w/ half that number. More importantly right-wing, conservative Jews are not as susceptible to non-procreative lifestyles. The Orthodox desire large families. They are the meek inheriting the earth to put the proper J-C spin on it.
So how do we escape this inevitable defeat? Does anyone have a plan? (Not just a rhetorical question.)
I tend to agree with your assessment. I wonder what tiny percentage of the tiny .2% of Jews really rules the world. Perhaps it's better to put an actual number on it, like 5000, or 300. Or 13.
I confess I struggle to answer your literal question. I attempted a general answer in the last chapter of my book. History has shown that most often Jews go too far, Whites react in a sudden spasm of self defense, and Jews are expelled to start up their power trip elsewhere. Then they come back to the nations where they were expelled with savage vengeance. We may be seeing that very dynamic in Ukraine/Russia today.
So the Last Resolution of the Jewish Issue may need to expel the Jews off the planet in some way. Or perhaps a gestalt of the multiple methods of dealing with destructive Jews in history could be combined in a Last Resolution. I honestly don't know. I agree with you, our prospects appear bleak, when a teacher reading aloud to students from an Anne Frank comic book is fired and forced to debase herself in groveling submission. Or a super-wealthy oligarch himself Kanye is impoverished almost overnight and "disappeared" for mentioning the Jewish dominance over media. I saw some hope in the American National Socialist revival among groups such as National Justice Party, Patriot Front and others if they could grow. But it now appears they are somewhat infiltrated, controlled, redirected and possibly even weaponized by Jewish forces within the FBI, Mossad, Jewish Antifa and other Jewish Power infrastructure.
Perhaps we need another savior savant messiah to uplift the White race against its ancient Semite enemy. Perhaps such a soul power is latent in each of us and can arise under desperate necessity, which we seem to be approaching. Election 2024 may be a flashpoint. Jews may control all flashpoints now too though, so the future is unclear and uncertain. Find certainly within ourselves.
Good reminder. Mr. X said a lot about Jew-Z influence in the U.S. So did Lenon, Jackson, Wexner's tax accountant, James Traficant, George Patton... look what happened to them. One wonders how Farrakhan gets away with it.
A correction on the Jewish IQ. Jews love to inflate their IQ to give them cover for their success. The IQ of nations shows that Israel's IQ is 93.
https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php
Thank you. I saw different scores on IQ from different sources. The IQ of Jews in Israel is very likely to be lower than the IQ of Jews in the US, for interesting reasons.
The IQ of American Jews seem that way because of hyperbole, ie Einstein. The movie Oppenheimer is another hyped up Jew porn production. Neither of the two were 'experimental' scientist as with most Jews. ― Nikola Tesla “Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ”
Agree. Jewish IQ is complicated, since a "brain drain" occurred when Jews sent their more intelligent sons who proved themselves in study of the Talmud to the West, raising the IQ of more Western Jews while lowering the IQ of Eastern Jews. Overall Jews do appear to have a similar IQ as Whites, on a bell curve. One factor to consider is the extent to which any race produces super-high IQ genuises, who can have large impacts on society and history. Trump claims to be one, but I doubt it. Same with Jews claiming genius status for Einstein. I agree with you, that is probably Jewish self-promotion fraud. We could probably add Oppenheimer, Freud, Boaz and many other Jewish "scientists." Tesla appears to have been a for-real genius.
and IQ's are not necessarily correlated to having common sense...how many geniuses gladly got the clot shot...or still believe the moon landing hoax or the official 9/11 story or the holohoax story...or that vaccines are safe and effective...I'm no "genius" but I am able to use common sense and logical reasoning
In a sense the Goebbels diary quote shows that IQ can be inverted from common sense (instinct).
Excellent essay, but this sentence would need more elaboration."Over the decades the Soviet Union endured until 1990 with extensive U.S support, an estimated 70 million were killed." Unless you are speaking of the support the Soviets received during WW2.
You are absolutely right. I knew when I wrote it that this needed more elaboration--or justification--since it is so astonishing a claim. Everyone knows the US and the USSR were in a bitter conflict throughout the Cold War, and any claim the US "supported" the USSR during that time seems absurd. Many know now, however, that the US hugely supported the USSR during WWII, especially with the Lend/Lease Act worked by Communist Jew traitors in the US Treasury Department. But too few know the US support to an immense amount continued after the war and throughout the Cold War period.
I refer you to the book Zionist Wall Street by George Washington Armstrong, and two essays in the previous edition of the Barnes Review July/August 2023: "American Support for Stalin Before WWII," and "American Support for Stalin During and After WWII," both by John Wear.
Very interesting! Supporting the Soviets after WW2 would require a motive. After all, the US planned on nuking the Soviets shortly after WW2.
I suspect the nuke plan was theatrical propaganda.
One motive for the US supporting the Soviets after WWII and throughout the "Cold War" is the utility of creating an perceived enemy. The benefit to both would be large, and not just hugely expanded defense budgets. The Jewish Totalitarian Capitalists and the Jewish Totalitarian Communists have always worked together in mutual support to advance the Zionist plan for world domination.
One of the more astonishing history from the Armstrong book was the fact that the US had supplied over 50% of the funding, materials, planning and building of the world's largest manufacturing plant of any kind in the USSR. It covered almost 40 acres, and it main production was in vehicles of all kinds: trucks, cars, motorcycles... At the time this plant was near peak capacity producing trucks, the US and the USSR were supposedly at war in Korea. The USSR was supplying war materials to the N Koreans using these trucks that the plant was manufacturing. Do we comprehend? The US had supported the infrastructure that allowed the Soviets to supply arms and war materials to what was said to be the US' enemy, the N Koreans! I think this was another case of the Jews playing both sides in a manufactured conflict. We may be seeing the same in Ukraine/Russia today.
"I suspect the nuke plan was theatrical propaganda."
Reno: I don't think so. That plan was hidden for many decades, and propaganda that you hide is not propaganda.
"One motive for the US supporting the Soviets after WWII and throughout the "Cold War" is the utility of creating an perceived enemy."
Reno: You don't need to support a gigantic and powerful country on your hit list to make it a perceived enemy. Turning the MSM lose is all that is needed. Here is a quote by Oswald Spengler, around 1920. "Four weeks of media campaign and everyone knows who the enemy is."
"The benefit to both would be large, and not just hugely expanded defense budgets."
Rerno: The huge defense budget is a given once the MSM tells you who the enemy is. Claiming that the enemy is much more powerful than it is will do. That can't be challenged by the masses.
"............................the US had supplied over 50% of the funding, materials, planning and building of the world's largest manufacturing plant of any kind in the USSR. It covered almost 40 acres, and it main production was in vehicles of all kinds: trucks, cars, motorcycles."
Reno: My guess "............the funding, materials, planning and building..." took place during WW2. The plant could very well have been finished after the war. You may have the answer, since I have not read the book.
Yes, propaganda must be publicly shared to be effective. Since in my view nuclear bomb technology was never invented, any threat of nuking Russia at any time must be propaganda. It is more fear appeal. Just like a deadly "novel" invisible coronavirus.
The British and French considered conventional bombing of the Baku oil fields even before WWII or at the latest early in the war before Barbarossa. That would most likely have won Germany and the Axis powers the war. Alas.
The USSR was certainly gigantic, but it was not powerful until the US funded it, transferred technology to it, helped organize its economy and manufacturing sector, including transferring and reassembling entire factories, rail road systems, refineries, mining operations and all the rest. The USSR was extraordinarily backward compared to other industrial nations at the time, and the US helped it catch up to serve as a suitable boogey man nation to drive the Cold War. Which was loaded with nuclear scares, pushed by the mentors of Klaus Schwab, Jews Herman Kahn and Henry Kissinger. But no nuclear bomb ever exploded (because there were none).
The huge defense budget always has to be justified by some perceived enemy, and if none of sufficient size and scariness exists, then it must be created, real or imagined or both. After 1990 it became "radical Islamic terrorists," and now it is "White supremacist terrorists," neither of which exist to any sufficient degree compared to the Zionist power. 911 justified the "war on terror" and C-ville and J6 justifies the war on Whites.
In the Cold War, the concept of the "missile gap" was used to re-inject huge sums of money into the MI complex. Whether the Soviets really had superior missile technology to the US is suspect, since the US supplied the Soviets' missile tech. So I agree with you the justification can be fabricated falsely. In the early 2000s Bush Sr and former CIA Director Baker were lobbyists for the arms industry while Bush Jr was President, all aimed at Israel's perceived enemies in the Middle East.
May I encourage you to buy a copy of Zionist Wall Street by Armstrong? I can't find the passage on the truck plant, and the book has no index. My recollection was that the plant was built after WWII but before the Korean War. Still, US support to the USSR continued long after WWII and even long after Korea.
Thank you for your quick reply. I have read the view before that nuclear technology was never invented. This appeared preposterous to me in the light of well documented nuclear explosion tests by different countries. Since I have not read anything other than that nuclear technology does not exist, I obviously wonder on what evidence this assertion is based. What would be the motive for different countries of playing along, particularly the Soviet Union, who could have called the bluff. Do you remember when Obama took power, he said he would declassify all WW2 documents. There are still tons of documents classified. Needless to say, there was no follow up, and I have not seen this mentioned by anyone since. Are you aware of that?
Karl, as usual, I agree with your thesis (in this case, genocidal elites) but not your conclusion that Jews are pulling the strings. Nobody is more aggravated about the brainwashed leftist Jews than we freedom-loving Jews (I'm quite disappointed to learn that Merrick Garland is Jewish), but to propose that Arab migration is a Jewish plot makes zero sense. Even the most anti-Israel Palestinian-loving communist Jew knows better than to invite high-testosterone Islamists into their city or country! And certainly the very principles of Zionism are antithetical to the strategy of expanding the footprint of Arab influence.
It's been a while since I've commented on one of your posts, but I've been thinking a lot about our prior discussions. Although I do think you demonstrate a confirmation bias against Jews that blinds you to the totality of genocidal elites who are our common enemy, and also blinds you to the important work of the many anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews, I have to concede that there are indeed far too many Jews who are on the wrong side.
A while ago, you suggested that the only way to make it clear that it's "not all Jews" would be for right-thinking Jews to start denouncing our wayward tribesmen. After careful consideration, I believe you are correct. Interestingly enough, the Bible is full of examples when Jewish leaders have done just this. This is a topic that I need to give further thought to.
Hello Lex. I always welcome your astute and informed comments. I highly value your perspective as a Jewish man yourself, and find further insights in our debates.
I acknowledge it seems counter-intuitive and counter-productive for Jews to be promoting Arab mass migration out of the Middle East and into White Western nations. Still, it might be in Israel's interests to enact a form of "brain drain," or in this case a young male militant drain from Israel's enemies in the region, such as Syria, Iran, Lebanon and elsewhere, by dumping them into White Western nations. Also, some Jews have begun to notice that increasing numbers of Arab Muslims in White Western nations where Jews project so much power could create an internal threat to that Jewish power, and have begun to curtail such migration.
As always, this sub-topic is more complex than either of us on our polarized positions portray.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/muslim-mass-migration-is-it-good-for-the-jews/
Some Jews are proposing measures to mitigate the damage migratory Arab Muslims are having on Jews in the West. Education on "antisemitism!" LOL
https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2018/11/05/german-jews-want-anti-semitism-classes-for-arab-muslim-migrants/
This seemed a good summary: "...many Jews firmly believe that by flooding White Europe with violent Muslims, White Europeans — the Jews’ historical enemy — would become so distracted by these new invaders that they wouldn’t notice that it was the Jews themselves who were the true destroyers..."
https://christiansfortruth.com/abortion-is-an-integral-part-of-jewish-identity-and-a-deeply-held-religious-conviction/
Still, these are all a few years old at least. But even in 2018 Jews were considering the wisdom of importing Arab Muslim men "extremists" into White Western nations Jews control.
https://www.ajc.org/news/a-recent-study-into-rising-antisemitism-in-europe-ignores-the-role-of-muslim-migrants
There is a lot more on this sub-topic and I haven't readily found any on post 2020 concerns of Jews for Arab Muslim presence in their migration waves. I trust you can find some in your sources, especially Jewish sources (and I don't mean main stream media which is certainly Jewish, but such outlets meant for Jewish readers/viewers such as JTA, Haaretz, The Forward, or your choice). Jews have even expressed concern for the "antisemitic" attitudes of African blacks, S Am mestizos, and other racial types that Jews bring into White Western nations, who resent noticing that Jews, far from being a fellow persecuted, discriminated-against minority, are actually much more among the wealthy and powerful.
You say: "I do think you demonstrate a confirmation bias against Jews that blinds you to the totality of genocidal elites who are our common enemy, and also blinds you to the important work of the many anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews..."
I've addressed before this misperception you appear to persist in holding about my views. I've acknowledged that the totality of genocidal elites who are our common enemy are Not All Jews, yet choose to focus on the Jewish representation because it is so under-represented and even obscured otherwise. In fact, naming the culprits as Jesuits, British aristocracy, WASPs, "corporations," "technocrats," "globalists," "chicoms," "neo-cons," and so on mostly serves to redirect proper blame from Jews onto distractions. Not entirely, since some of these factions participate in what you call genocidal elites, but overwhelmingly it serves to obscure the Jewish role, which in my view is predominant today. That is why I have chosen to represent the Jewish component more directly: too few others do, including you.
As for "blinds you to the important work of the many anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews," I address this in the first chapter of my book Covert Covid Culprits, Not All Jews!. I name groups such as Breaking the Silence, and individuals such as Gilad Atzmon, Benjamin Freedman and Paul Eisen among others. Perhaps you mean anti-communist Jews at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution, and if so then that is a sub-topic on which I am not well researched, and welcome your knowledge. I know some Zionist Jews at the time were opposed to Communism, and even proposed to ally with the National Socialist Germans against USSR, on behalf of the dream of Israel. Still, the Zionist Jews were just as authoritarian as the Communists, and just as mass murderous, given the later Nakbah and even other terrorism the Zionist Jews inflicted even on other Jews (SS Patria, King David Hotel and others I document in Chapter 3, Jewish "Anti-semitism.") Churchill wrote about it in 1920 in his newspaper article, "Bolshevism vs. Zionism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." Why? Was Churchill Jewish on his mother's side? If so, another mass murdering authoritarian war monger Jew.
I respect that you can consider the value in something I have proposed. I reveal that I am not "anti-semitic" in the simplistic propaganda sense of hating all Jews just because they are Jews (an absurdity for anyone), because I welcome "good" Jews such as you appear to be in our movement against what you have called the genocidal elite, and I sometimes call the World Controller Class, the Oligarch Overlords, and within them the Jewish Power Elite. Hitler accepted at least half-Jews into the Wehrmacht, known as Mishclings, and I welcome "good" Jews (carefully vetted) into our self-defense efforts against our common enemy of humanity.
I'm interested in seeing what examples in the Bible you will cite. Moses directed the Levite clan to slaughter members of other Israelite clans, and even other Levites, after he caught them worshiping the golden calf idol. This is more an example of the grotesque fratricidal nature of Jews and their obsession with egomaniacal religious jealousy and control than a good example for how Jews today can oppose their kindred among the Jewish Power Elite, but I may be wrong and it could be a good example. The Jewish Power Elite worships the god of Mammon and demonic entities such as Moloch, Baphomet and Lucifer, so perhaps a response to such idolatry is appropriate from "good" Jews.
Please share any examples from the Bible (Torah) you think indicative, and I welcome your further thoughts.
Thanks for those articles, Karl. Apparently, I underestimated just how suicidal and self-loathing the suicidal, self-loathing leftist Jews are. I'm not sure you can imagine how frustrating it is to see a contingent of your own people working with passion and dedication towards goals that are completely contrary to your interests (and, indeed, survival). If they want to sacrifice themselves to their false gods, that's their choice, but I strongly resent them trying to take me with them!
Speaking of false gods, I want to address your mention of "grotesque fratricidal nature of Jews and their obsession with egomaniacal religious jealousy and control." I can see why you might have that impression, but let me share a different perspective.
Within the Jewish religion, monotheism is the prime directive. The first commandment is "You shall have no other gods before Me." Note that this does not contradict the EXISTENCE of other gods, but merely prohibit Jews from worshipping them instead of our God. While this has some interesting supernatural connotations, the main idea is that things like money, sex, authority and government should not be given higher priority than religious observance. Thus, while the gentile world tends to look at Jewish focus on financial success as immoral (or at least superficial), within Jewish culture, the accumulation of wealth is considered a moral good, because money allows you to do things that are in service of God.
That's in theory.
In practice, just as in Mosaic times, there are Jews who will turn from God and worship money, sex, authority, or whatever other Golden Calf is presented to them at the first opportunity. And, just as in the Bible, this is rightly perceived as a threat to the survival of the entire people. "If your right hand offends you, cut it off." What you perceive as fratricidal fanaticism is more accurately considered purging traitors from an army. Either you are for God, or you are for Mammon. There is no in-between.
To bring it full circle, the example of Jews advocating for mass Arab immigration is a perfect example of how those members of the tribe who worship false gods - in this case, the leftist ideology - constitute a threat to the entire tribe. I would argue that Jews like Jeffrey Epstein, who abandon morality in order to curry favor with the genocidal elites, are much the same. People like Rachelle Walensky and Merrick Garland are, in my opinion, probably "useful idiots" that are used as proxies by people with greater influence; I'll give them the benefit of the doubt that they're brainwashed and actually believe they're doing the right thing. Of course, I could be wrong.
To end on a happier note, I'll answer your question about anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Jews. I'm not talking about Bolshevik history, I'm referring to influential thinkers such as Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman, Murray Rothbard, Ivan Illich, and others who vehemently and persuasively informed the general public about the dangers of collectivism and totalitarianism.
I'll have to respond to the Jewish libertarians and anti-collectivists in a short while. Thank you for sharing, you make some good points.
For a bit of forgotten history, look into the American Jewish League Against Communism. This group (which included Senator McCarthy's lawyer Roy Cohn among its founders) not only forcefully condemned Marxist-Leninist philosophy, but denounced by name those Jewish leaders who supported it.
I will have to get back to a reply later, but for now I will make a few notes to remind me: Roy Cohn was a vile wretched evil Jew who organized child raping blackmail rings and was a Jewish organized crime attorney. If he opposed Communism, it was only so he could espouse Jewish organized crime power, which included the Jewish totalitarian capitalists and Zionist banksters. Perhaps this is why Cohn was a mentor to the Jewish organized crime syndicate's future president, Donald Trump.
To you point, I once had a copy of the Charter of the International Jewish Anti-Zionist League, which I can no longer find. The diversity of perspectives among different kinds of Jews can be remarkable, including Jews opposed to Zionism. So I recognize your view.
More later.
LOL ... I was wondering what you would have to say about Roy Cohn. A distasteful fellow by all accounts, but at least he wasn't a pinko.
Yes, and at least he was a Jew, so his horrific evil can be forgiven and even celebrated. LOL
As we can see in my comment below on Voluntarism vs. National Socialism, for Jews to be advocating for Libertarianism is to be advocating for only one side of the equation while leaving out the other. Was Rand Jewish? Her real name was something else. These Jewish Libertarians certainly warned the public about the dangers of collectivism and totalitarianism, but they not only failed to warn us about the dangers of laissez faire individualist capitalism, they celebrated it. This was a great benefit to the Jewish banksters and their private profiteering operations, including arms dealing, drug dealing, world-wide prostitution, the slave trade (including Whites), and certainly legitimate industry and commerce too, including loaning currency to entire nation-states at interest and taxing the populations to replay the interest on the debt, while controlling their domestic policies and programs to inflict cultural degeneracy and controlling their media/entertainment apparatus for the same objective.
Libertarian Jews warned against totalitarian communism, but advocated for totalitarian capitalism. Only a National Socialist/Fascist government finds the balance and fusion of both. But Libertarian Jews placed National Socialism/Fascism in the same category as totalitarian Communism, thereby demonizing it and ensuring that their individualist-only capitalism would be free to exploit and oppress the nations. Some including NS leaders call this Plutocracy, the rule of money. It is certainly dominant over the US and most of the West today, where government is simply that which Jewish money buys.
A couple notes for later:
Are the crazy extremist leftist Jews any better than the far-right extremist Jews such as US Zionist neo-cons and the Likudniks in Israel?
Jeffrey Epstein WAS (possibly still is) the genocidal elite. Some of them curried favor with him. Except I think their child raping activities were much more than blackmail, but full-on Jewish Ritual Murder which has been a proven legal and historical phenomenon since the 1100s in Europe. This was not done by Epstein/Wexner/Maxwell (Hoch) for blackmail, but as part of the evil rituals along the levels of the pyramid of power, including Cremation of Care (eradication of the capacity for empathy), affirmation of Jewish supremacy, and adrenochrome addiction.
The dichotomy between far-left and far-right is largely an artificial one, as I'm sure you know. From the perspective of human rights, health, and happiness, the question is not really what KIND of government, but what DEGREE of government. Both the left and the right tend quickly and inevitably toward cronyism, corruption, and authoritarianism, which is why the only moral position is the libertarian one.
As far as I can tell, most of the policies you advocate for fall into this category, as you are (to the best of my understanding) essentially proposing that those who are attracted to white nationhood be able to form and live in such a nation. This is more or less a "voluntaryist" philosophy, in that you're not advocating for the genocide or oppression of any other people, you're simply stating that you should be able to live as you see fit, without interference from others.
I recognize some validity to the left-right dichotomy, but less to its divide. That is certainly in degree artificially created. We have news of a fierce left-right divide in Israel at the moment, and I don't imagine either of us would say it is exclusively artificial; it must have some ideological validity.
I fundamentally disagree with you that Degree of government is what matters, not kind. That is a common right-wing perception--"less government, low taxes, free market forces"--but there is a 3rd Position. A National Socialist and Fascist government more generally is a fusion of the best of left and right, while leaving out the worst. It is authoritarian without being cronyist or corrupt. It regulates the economy for the benefit of the people and nation without either owning the economy itself (Communism) or leaving it completely free to become corrupt and destructive (libertarian capitalism). A National Socialist government is the functioning fusion of individualism and collectivism, which if we think about it, it must be to be good government. The choice between individualism or collectivism is a false one. The answer is both.
In my understanding, Voluntarism is anarchism = no leadership. I had troubles with young men in an Voluntarist Freedom Cell when I began to share with them eugenics principles. Did we make a decision whether to allow me to stay in the group on Voluntarist principles? No, they contacted the "leaders" of Voluntarism Derek Broze and John Bush, who issued the decree that I was to be expelled from the group for blasphemous thinking. LOL Some Voluntarists, they went straight up the hierarchy for their decision. In short, leaderless human groups are impossible and counter-natural. Much better to identify the natural leaders and grant them leadership power over the nation and people for the good of all.
"not advocating for the genocide or oppression of any other people, simply stating that you should be able to live as you see fit, without interference from others," is in my view not voluntarism, but racialism (when applied to ethno-states). And it is definitely not White Supremacism, but rather Racialism again, which says each racial type should be allowed to live among their own and work out their own racial destiny, without interference and without pressure to cater to, harbor, rescue, finance, school, uplift or advocate for any other race. Only their own.
One interesting aspect of this history is that the lives of Black Africans, especially the women and children, were far better in terms of quality of life on Southern plantations than they were back in their native African tribes. But that's getting too specific. Generally, Voluntarism/Anarchism believes in no leaders, because leaders are by nature corrupt and exploitative and oppressive, while National Socialism believes in ultimate leadership authority, because leaders can be by nature responsible, accountable, and devoted to the well-being of people and nation both, much more than any others in the population. Voluntarism has the tendency to promote the least capable into decision making power (as does majority voting), while National Socialism has the tendency to promote the most capable.
That picture of Pincus... wow. Definitely a trustworthy face.
Every single time!
It was his Wikipedia picture. There may be some truth in physiognomy.
Kakistocracy-(noun) government that is run by the least competent or worst members of society
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u05ePzDqp2c/
https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2022/02/23/chrystia-freelands-nazi-history/
Good word.
Why do keep peddling the crap about low IQ of Africans? I worked in Papua New Guinea as a medical student and saw that the people there thought as well as Whites did. There were the dumb and the clever, but as they usually did not know English would score about 20 on an IQ test. By suggesting that IQ differences are genetically-based - the normal unstated presumption in the West - you maintain old prejudices that the Jew-Zios readily feed upon to justify the depopulation agenda by demonizing Whites, e.g. the Southern Poverty Law Centre. As for Israeli IQ - if they keep getting the COVID jabs they will lucky to reach 80. Presumably this is intended in order to make them trigger-happy so as to kill the unjabbed COVID-variant-bearing Palestinians!
I present the data derived from race-adjusted IQ test results. And because the history shows the African blacks on their own never invented the wheel. How can anyone "see" that one race of people "thought as well" as another race? IQ tests measure specific cognitive capacities, not cultural norms, social group think or "common sense." I would think IQ tests would be language-adjusted.
No, the "normal" unstated presumption in the West now is that IQ is entirely environmental and no racial influence exists. Further, it is Whitey's fault that black IQ is low. But the Bell Curve by Murray (and his deceased co-author) shows race certainly contributes a inherited component to IQ. But this is now verboten to say or even think. We think it here at Taboo Truth.
How does maintaining that race contributes a component to IQ justify the Jewish depopulation agenda against Whites? Actually, race IQ reality should justify Black depop, not White.
As always, though we have heard much news out of Israel regarding their almost total vax saturation, Jews lie and we cannot believe any of it. Besides, Israeli Jews are already trigger-happy toward Palestinians and vax damage will only make it harder to perfect their aim in shooting Palestinians promoting their Right of Return in the eyes and legs to cripple them. If Israeli Jews are really fully vaxed with Pfizer genetic poison, and not placebos or hardly at all, they will be lucky to reach 40. Or 2026. Still, Israel continues to desperately try and get Jews to move into Israel, so why would they slaughter off so many already there? Are they planning to abandon Israel and shift their Jewish goyim to Ukraine after Blackrock rebuilds the place as the first example of a Great Reset panopticon digital dictatorship nation?
One doesn't even need to utilize IQ studies on race to draw some of the same conclusions! The greatest, most revolutionary, forward-forming scientific and technological inventions have sprouted from the minds of European men: jet propulsion/airplane, internal combustion engine/automobile, computer, telephone, telegraph, steam engine, printing press, cinema, eyeglasses, wireless communications/internet, electricity/light bulb, train, bicycle, and even civil liberties/government. I could add countless others; not to say that other races haven't provided any great inventions- they have!
The history of the negro, on the other hand, is absent and destitute of any inventions of major impact. Having had most of the whole Sub-Saharan continent of Africa to themselves for numerous generations, yet the negro couldn't find a way to invent even the wheel or develop complex agriculture beyond localized husbandry and the fallow system.
Even Hegel, in his 'Philosophy of History,' explains (see link below) how the negro is the personification of primitiveness and backwards development and that, for centuries in Africa, slavery, whether to himself or the land, was his "absolute condition." It was only in his encounter with Europeans that helped the negro liberate his condition partially, and introduce him to a "consciousness of freedom."
https://metadave.wordpress.com/2007/11/10/hegel-on-africans-1873/
Since I'm never on top of topical news, I had need to look into the Anne Frank fiasco for details. It seems the msm, in pursuit of freedom to spread the Jewish agenda, is opposed by local parents and Texas book-banners. The Texans don't want the nudity and normalizing of lesbian relations this version of the book provides. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-teacher-fired-for-teaching-about-anne-frank-s-diary-and-sexuality/ar-AA1h0Jgv
Can we make an educated guess on how many Jews it takes to rule the world? Maybe that could start a joke contest. Funniest answer wins a foreskin restoration.
If there is a fixed number that has to be maintained, I'd say 10. They call it a minyan. But since the Elders are number obsessed, they've got plenty of other candidates. Isn't 20 the number of letters in their holy alphabet? Can't go wrong w/ 6 either.
I'd like to see them deported to Israel. Sucks for the Pals, I know. But should it become a realistic possibility, a renewed alliance w/ the Arab nations would accompany the Final Exodus as a matter of course and that would put a shiver into their shekels.
You make a good point about Jews overdoing things. The 5 Dancing Israelis being an important recent example. They do overplay their hand w/ some regularity. But since they control msm, they just as regularly get away w/ it.
Altho the Tribe's been historically evicted over 100 times (and comes back when memory fades or money is needed) when was the last time a country gave them the boot? 19th century? 18th? Nor can it have been from a democracy. Must have been from monarchy or some type of authoritarian regime. I think that's our only chance. The sheep will not rise up on their own; won't vote them out. It's not in their nature. They're lambs not wolves.
Indeed, what the Chabad Lubavitcher Jewish Zelensky and the Chabad Lubavitcher Jewish Putin really mean when they both say they are fighting 'Nazis' on the other side is that they are both exterminating white Christians, Gentiles in general, including by suiciding the Gentile peoples that they now control themselves by unneccessarily involving them in combat against each other according to the earlier directive of the late chief Chabad Lubavitcher Rabbi Menachem Schneeson that a war must be made to occur in Ukraine with Russia to 'end the line of the Slavs' there in order that millions of Israeli Jews will then be able to move into vacated lands there when the time comes for Israeli Jews to jump ship from present day Israel (14 million Ukrainians have also fled Ukraine while 500,000 others are thought to have been sacrificed in the fighting by Zelensky).
Thus, we are indeed, all 'eternally Nazis' to the Jews, and always have been as far as they are concerned of course, as they mean to plant the lot of us and always have done from the very start.
They thoroughly mean to conquer the entire planet and ultimately to physically exterminate every single last Gentile on the entire planet so as to have it totally to themselves, their scriptures say just that and their rabbis today say exactly that in numerous videos that I show on my site. The Jewish hive mindset is dangerously subnormal and pathologically insane despite their expertise in certain areas, a lethal threat against the entire planet.
Interesting interpretation. I have read that Putin expelled the Jewish Oligarchs, but placated the Chabad Jews in Russia. They said they control 50% of Russia's economy now. But Putin is not himself Chabad, is he? I've heard he was raised by Jews next door when his parents were not home after he came home from school as a boy. Hard to know what's true. It does appear that both Putin and Zelensky/his Jewish handlers are prolonging the war unnecessarily to increase attrition. They are having enough trouble keeping and getting enough Jews into Israel, they might not be able to steal and colonize another region such as Ukraine both. But to shift the Israeli population to Ukraine would be an immense undertaking. They would still want to hold onto Israel because the Belt & Road is aimed to lead there, and it is the center of the McKinder map for world control. Just yesterday I had the insight that the Belt & Road is being established partially to increase the floods of Asians and Arabs and Africans too into Europe to complete the destruction of Amalek. The Road is a migrant road.
Thankyou for your reply. It is the literal fact of the matter. 80% of all rabbis in Russia are Chabad Lubavitchers, they have not been expelled, they control the UN and US with the Noahide Laws having been officially accepted by the UN and US for future physical implementation under UN-intended future Jewish one world government (mass genocidal criminal terrorist dictatorship) they have openly stated in video recorded speeches at mass meetings of their own members that they control 100% of political affairs in both Russia and Ukraine, the videos are still available I think on Renegade Tribune of them saying this, I had them on my old site at WordPress till my entire site was suddenly deleted irretrievably by TPTB. We will see the 'reasonable', 'progressive', 'friendly' Jews show their real colours then when they celebrate the victory of the Jews, you will not see a single Jew of these 'friendly Jew' types stand and fight alongside the Gentiles against the NWO Jewish-controlled forces when they go into full military mode, though various forms of lethal aggression are already being employed against Gentiles by Jewish-controlled agencies that most people cannot even comprehend in all kinds of sneaky ways that most do not even suspect.
Putin has been video-recorded and photographed at a number of different venues at different political events wearing a Chabad Lubavitcher red thread on his wrist, indicating that he himself is a Chabad Lubavitcher member, I have an article showing Putin doing this repeatedly on my present site, yet the Talmud states clearly that all Christians are to be killed by the Jews, so what kind of Christian can Putin be? He is a despicable fake.
He is fanatical at lying that the holocaust really happened, and is a fanatical defender of Judaism and a fanatical supporter of Israel, not a genuine Christian, he has had holocaust denial in Russia made a criminal offence and he is an alumnus of the WEF under the Jew Klaus Schwab just as Zelensky himself is, they are all playing the same WEF game for Israel while pretending to be on opposing sides.
The Jewish game is to get Gentiles controlled by them to kill each other under the impression they are fighting to preserve their nations, but they are all being ritually sacrificed to satisfy the ever-bloodthirsty Jews.
Isaiah 19:2 KJV -
"And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother, and every one against his neighbour; city against city, and kingdom against kingdom."
Obviously, only one Egyptian kingdom could possibly have existed under one single leader at any one time back then, thus 'kingdom against kingdom' here is cryptic for 'Gentile nation against Gentile nation', and 'Egyptian' is cryptic for Gentile.
Will blowback be the Jewish undoing? It doesn't seem so, not so far anyway. Their racial/genetic population has been constantly taking hits from their various destructive agendas thru the ages. But control over gentiles has never been stronger. They have us in a submission lock, the classic sleeper hold, and continue to apply pressure while we sputter and twitch in response.
I don't think weakening demographics will ever reach a critical mass whereby they'll lose control due to diminished numbers. Already they rule w/ only .2%. At this point they could hold us w/ half that number. More importantly right-wing, conservative Jews are not as susceptible to non-procreative lifestyles. The Orthodox desire large families. They are the meek inheriting the earth to put the proper J-C spin on it.
So how do we escape this inevitable defeat? Does anyone have a plan? (Not just a rhetorical question.)
I tend to agree with your assessment. I wonder what tiny percentage of the tiny .2% of Jews really rules the world. Perhaps it's better to put an actual number on it, like 5000, or 300. Or 13.
I confess I struggle to answer your literal question. I attempted a general answer in the last chapter of my book. History has shown that most often Jews go too far, Whites react in a sudden spasm of self defense, and Jews are expelled to start up their power trip elsewhere. Then they come back to the nations where they were expelled with savage vengeance. We may be seeing that very dynamic in Ukraine/Russia today.
So the Last Resolution of the Jewish Issue may need to expel the Jews off the planet in some way. Or perhaps a gestalt of the multiple methods of dealing with destructive Jews in history could be combined in a Last Resolution. I honestly don't know. I agree with you, our prospects appear bleak, when a teacher reading aloud to students from an Anne Frank comic book is fired and forced to debase herself in groveling submission. Or a super-wealthy oligarch himself Kanye is impoverished almost overnight and "disappeared" for mentioning the Jewish dominance over media. I saw some hope in the American National Socialist revival among groups such as National Justice Party, Patriot Front and others if they could grow. But it now appears they are somewhat infiltrated, controlled, redirected and possibly even weaponized by Jewish forces within the FBI, Mossad, Jewish Antifa and other Jewish Power infrastructure.
Perhaps we need another savior savant messiah to uplift the White race against its ancient Semite enemy. Perhaps such a soul power is latent in each of us and can arise under desperate necessity, which we seem to be approaching. Election 2024 may be a flashpoint. Jews may control all flashpoints now too though, so the future is unclear and uncertain. Find certainly within ourselves.
Remember too what Malcolm X said about Jew-Zionist influence in the USA - he was shot dead a week later!
Good reminder. Mr. X said a lot about Jew-Z influence in the U.S. So did Lenon, Jackson, Wexner's tax accountant, James Traficant, George Patton... look what happened to them. One wonders how Farrakhan gets away with it.