It has come to my attention that it is now time to address something that many still believe is the ultimate Taboo Truth: the holocaust (I choose not to capitalize it except in a title because in that way I convey its diminished importance).
To everyone reading and commenting and liking and sharing here:
I really should have remembered to include another key source of holocaust revision I have found in my journey of awakening. Since it came very late, after I had fully broken from the spell, I did not consider it as part of my earlier awakening process. But it is still highly persuasive on its own, and I have made print copies and hand them out when possible. One persuasive aspect of this source is that the author is Jewish, though not the most persuasive aspect. That is found in the review of revisionist history the author covers. I have covered most of that myself, and more, but this essay does a great service of summarizing revisionist material to the point of a clear conclusion.
Thankyou for some excellent reading material there. Stalin executed around 5.5 million Russian POW's returned from German camps as 'traitors' for not having fought to the death, perhaps Stalin's sudden need to accuse the Germans of killing 6 million Jews was an attempt to deflect attention away from himself and his own actions? Stalin did just the same with the Katyn Forest Massacre and the purported massacre of 100,000 Jews at Babi Yar, where in reality, Bolsheviks had slaughtered scores of thousands of Christians 20 years earlier, but the WWII Russians had the deaths faked as being recent during the recent German occupation of the land, a typical Jewish ploy.
The Russians even had 40,000 dishonest sworn affidavits collected from Russian soldiers testifying to what they 'knew' the Germans had done. But thousands of Allied air reconnaissance photos proved that the Germans never buried any bodies there at the time they were there, the bodies were in an advanced state of decomposition from 20 years earlier, and the Russians refused to allow any Western forensic investigators to analyze the bodies. Such is 'Russian' Jewish 'evidence' under Jewish criminal terrorist dictatorship.
Covering for Stalin's mass executions of POWs was one function of the holocaust I never considered. I know about a half dozen others. The holocaust narrative was not pushed heavily in the U.S. until `1967, after Israel's success in the Six Day War. Stalin died in 1954.
I must add that one function of the holohoax is to cover and redirect attention away from the real war crimes committed by the Allies. That could include the Soviet execution of POWs.
Summer, 1945, by Thomas Goodrich reveals much of the true horror of the terrorist tactics used by the Jews who controlled the 'Allies'. Prolonging The Agony by Jim MacGregor and Gerry Docherty demonstrates how the Natty Rothschild-funded 'Elite' group started WWI and the Bolshevik Revolution, and ultimately WWII with Jewish Churchill of course having been a major instigator in both conflicts.
The Jews throughout, even from the time of Cromwell, have been playing their usual dirty game of land clearance by hypnotizing and tricking Gentiles to split into hostle rival factions and then slaughter each other.
I am cautious of Goodrich. His writing is too often sensationalist without citation. He claimed firebombing melted steel girders and molten steel poured down on cowering victims below. That smacks of jet fuel melting steel girders to collapse tall buildings. Goodrich also wrote that the U.S. military drilled holes through the ground through the ceiling of underground caves where Japanese people on Okinawa were hiding. Those evil Americans then poured gasoline in the hole and threw a lit match into the cave to burn the innocent Japanese civilians to death. LOL. Sounds like cutting holes in the roof of the gas chamber to throw Zyklon B crystals down. Goodrich is the only author at the Barnes Review who can submit articles without footnotes. The editors at TBR often scrutinize my footnotes and sometimes ask for different or additional citations. Not so Goodrich. ?
Thomas Dalton wrote and published The Jewish Hand in the World Wars to explain that component of war-mongering. I'll look into Prolonging the Agony.
Churchill's ancestry looks as if it includes at least one Jew among his grandparents if I remember. Do you have a reference?
Prolonging the Agony was the second of two books on how WWI was instigated, Hidden History of The First World War by Macgregor and Docherty was the first book, it also makes excellent reading.
I have read that Churchill's mother was a New York Jewess called Jerome. Churchill sent the bombs down on Dresden on the anniversary of the burning to death of many Jewish doctors in Dresden centuries ago for their typical Jewish crimes, which had also occurred and also been discovered in Vienna for instance, with similar consequences to the Viennese Jewish doctors, many Jews were burned alive there too centuries ago, the rabbinical instruction was for Jewish 'doctors' (terrorist military operatives) working in Gentile communities to poison to death every 10th Christian patient, and of course, the 9 properly cured Gentiles would act as unwitting shills and protest the genuineness of the Jewish doctor when any deaths occurred to protect and vouch for him, but of course, when those same patients returned again and again over the years it would be like playing Russian roulette and become more obvious what was really happening.
Churchill is reported to have said "How shall we light up 600,000?", and "We shall baste them in their own fat" before the terrorist Dresden fire bombings with high incendiary devices and high explosives occurred, when the town would be packed with anywhere up to 1.25 million refugees. That would tend to support that Churchill was a Jew, he was acting exactly as a Jew would, who of course, wanted vengeance on the Germans for having discovered that Jews had been steadily murdering them all along and then punishing them, the Jews don't like that, as they consider it is their 'divine' right to do exactly as they please, and the Jewish doctors of today are engaged in precisely the same military campaign of terrorism, stopping people getting real treatment for cancer, causing more cancer with X-Rays, chemo, with antibiotics that permanently damage the immune system (6 antibiotic courses in any young woman under the age of 18 make her 3 times more likely to get breast cancer in later life, the original clinically demonstrated, proven and officially acknowledged Rife technology of the 1930's provenly cured all pathogen-related diseases and all cancers in a completely non-harmful and non-invasive way, which was suppressed by the Jewish AMA head Morris Fishbein acting under the Jewish POTUS Roosevelt), other deliberately inflicted causes of cancer are chlorine and toxic fluoride compounds in drinking and bathing water, arsenic added to cigarette paper and 600 chemicals including addicting chemicals deliberately placed in cigarette tobacco etc. etc., the Eustace Mullins book 'Murder By Injection' discusses much of this.
You have got me looking back into this issue of Churchill's mother now, some writers will obfuscate and ridicule, then some Jew will say anyone who thinks Churchill's mother was a Jewess is necessarily a 'Loonie' (a typical sign that whoever is being accused of being a loonie by the Jew is actually perfectly correct), and then you have the view which conforms with the idea of Churchill being a Jew. One link I provide reference to here, Jew World Order seems to oppose Jewish world hegemony, whilst also seeming to be highly critical of some links alleged to have existed with Hitler and the NSDAP, but also provides some good information, though I think Sefton Delmer has heavily altered 'history' so much that he has thoroughly muddied the waters in a most evilly expert way. And then another report, by a lady wearing a Star of David, says Churchill's mother really was a Jewess, and what she says is extremely cogent.
We will all have to do a bit of filtering through it all there, but Churchill was thoroughly immersed in Jewish company, his close personal friend of 30 years and principal wartime advisor Lindemann was a homosexual Jew.
Jews utterly despise Gentiles ("Even the best of Gentiles should all be killed" says the Talmud) so if Churchill had been a Gentile soul I think the Jews would have vomited him out. I do not think it is possible for a Gentile to be so daft as to be so involved with Jews without being one.
One does have to ask, if he was not actually a Jew, why on earth did he enact the Jewish agenda with such furious hatred and absolute devotion? He wanted to gas bomb all of Germany, the RAF declined his plans, likewise his desire to anthrax bomb all of Germany, which would have left much of Europe still uninhabitable today, but that action and its results would still have very totally fitted in with ultimate Jewish agenda directives, to exterminate all whites, then all Gentiles in fact.
Churchill said what had been most difficult was not how to stop the war, but how to get it started had been the most difficult thing, and once it had started, not how to stop it as soon as possible, but how to keep it going as long as possible, Rothschild-controlled 'Britain' pursued the exact same mercilessly vindictive policy in WWI, same with the Ukraine war today, the heavily Zionist 'Indian' blackface UK PM Rishi Sunak and his 80% Friends of Israel fanatically loyal Zionist mob of today have stated that they intend for the Ukraine war to be made to go on as long as possible, of course to fulfil the Jewish agenda to wipe out as many people as possible in the area, to force as many people off the area as possible in order for the Bigger Israel to be created there in line with the instructions of the late chief Chabad Lubavitcher Rabbi Menachem Schneerson years ago, and then of course, all whites are intended by the Jews to be exterminated anyway, and then, all Gentiles in the entire world, as their own rabbis in video recordings openly state to their own congregations in leaked films which are published on my site, I have possibly provided links to them before when commenting here on other occasions.
One author who claims to have done a thorough review of the evidence says Churchill's mother was definitely not a Jewess obviously does not like 'Nazis' as he calls the National Socialists, in other words, he is another criminally insane Jew-lover, who savagely criticizes David Irving for no good reason in an actually very hateful Jewish manner by stating that even if Irving told him the time, he would have to check with 5 different clocks. Any genuinely objective 'historian', if he were actually genuine, would most certainly be on the side of the Axis powers and National Socialism, and most certainly not on the side of the Jews who caused WWI and WWII and the Bolshevik Red Revolution in Russia and the communist revolution in China, remembering again, "Even the best of Gentiles should all be killed".
HCN victims should show red skin discoloration. All the dead bodies in camp liberation films do not show this. Now granted all such original films are in b&w, so particular colors aren't discernible (red v blue). But no discoloration can be seen at all. Telling.
I didn't know about the lighter than air and corrosive qualities which render Z-B not shower friendly. Knowing some pertinent facts become weapons of counter-mythology. Learn them. Use them. I will. We must spread this kind of telling info as best we can. But w/ a caveat, we should do it, tell it w/o leaving others more wary and confused about ourselves than about the subject. Well said, Karl. Maintain dignity. Avoid excessive emotionality. Strong soldier.
Also telling that no eye-witness to mass gassings ever said they saw red bodies. Wouldn't they have, since it would be such a striking stunning sight? A couple of eye-witnesses in the Zundel trial were cross examined by defense attorney Doug Christie, and when first asked what color were the bodies they saw, they said blue and green and gray. Then Christie presented the expert knowledge of Dr. Fred Leuchter, which proved that bodies dead from HCN inhalation turned bright red. When asked again, the eye-witnesses admitted they really had not actually seen any bodies killed by HCN. Case closed!
A delicate act conveying information without condemning ourselves. It can be done. Emotional detachment is key. Dispassionate presentation of facts few have heard before. Like HCN gas floats. Talk like a scientist. No attachment either way. Ever heard of the Zundel trial? Who is David Irving? The Germans did have delousing chambers. Doubts, doubts...
Archive is awesome if it has all these books. I have them all in print copy which I find easier to read, but I can also read on Archive if I put it on night mode with a black background and white font. Easier on the eyes. I am going to add another link in the comment section which I should have put in the essay. Look for that too.
I did not know this one. Someone needs to chronicle the persecution of revisionists. Jews always claiming victim status, here are innocent people victimized by Jews.
Everyone should at least read one of the main and general books from the Institue of Historical Review. And then let it rest. Being informed is one thing. Quite another to look for your house being burned down and having your family assassinated by the Anglo-Khazarian Entendre.
To everyone reading and commenting and liking and sharing here:
I really should have remembered to include another key source of holocaust revision I have found in my journey of awakening. Since it came very late, after I had fully broken from the spell, I did not consider it as part of my earlier awakening process. But it is still highly persuasive on its own, and I have made print copies and hand them out when possible. One persuasive aspect of this source is that the author is Jewish, though not the most persuasive aspect. That is found in the review of revisionist history the author covers. I have covered most of that myself, and more, but this essay does a great service of summarizing revisionist material to the point of a clear conclusion.
Holocaust Denial by Ron Unz
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
Thankyou for some excellent reading material there. Stalin executed around 5.5 million Russian POW's returned from German camps as 'traitors' for not having fought to the death, perhaps Stalin's sudden need to accuse the Germans of killing 6 million Jews was an attempt to deflect attention away from himself and his own actions? Stalin did just the same with the Katyn Forest Massacre and the purported massacre of 100,000 Jews at Babi Yar, where in reality, Bolsheviks had slaughtered scores of thousands of Christians 20 years earlier, but the WWII Russians had the deaths faked as being recent during the recent German occupation of the land, a typical Jewish ploy.
The Russians even had 40,000 dishonest sworn affidavits collected from Russian soldiers testifying to what they 'knew' the Germans had done. But thousands of Allied air reconnaissance photos proved that the Germans never buried any bodies there at the time they were there, the bodies were in an advanced state of decomposition from 20 years earlier, and the Russians refused to allow any Western forensic investigators to analyze the bodies. Such is 'Russian' Jewish 'evidence' under Jewish criminal terrorist dictatorship.
Covering for Stalin's mass executions of POWs was one function of the holocaust I never considered. I know about a half dozen others. The holocaust narrative was not pushed heavily in the U.S. until `1967, after Israel's success in the Six Day War. Stalin died in 1954.
I must add that one function of the holohoax is to cover and redirect attention away from the real war crimes committed by the Allies. That could include the Soviet execution of POWs.
Summer, 1945, by Thomas Goodrich reveals much of the true horror of the terrorist tactics used by the Jews who controlled the 'Allies'. Prolonging The Agony by Jim MacGregor and Gerry Docherty demonstrates how the Natty Rothschild-funded 'Elite' group started WWI and the Bolshevik Revolution, and ultimately WWII with Jewish Churchill of course having been a major instigator in both conflicts.
The Jews throughout, even from the time of Cromwell, have been playing their usual dirty game of land clearance by hypnotizing and tricking Gentiles to split into hostle rival factions and then slaughter each other.
I am cautious of Goodrich. His writing is too often sensationalist without citation. He claimed firebombing melted steel girders and molten steel poured down on cowering victims below. That smacks of jet fuel melting steel girders to collapse tall buildings. Goodrich also wrote that the U.S. military drilled holes through the ground through the ceiling of underground caves where Japanese people on Okinawa were hiding. Those evil Americans then poured gasoline in the hole and threw a lit match into the cave to burn the innocent Japanese civilians to death. LOL. Sounds like cutting holes in the roof of the gas chamber to throw Zyklon B crystals down. Goodrich is the only author at the Barnes Review who can submit articles without footnotes. The editors at TBR often scrutinize my footnotes and sometimes ask for different or additional citations. Not so Goodrich. ?
Thomas Dalton wrote and published The Jewish Hand in the World Wars to explain that component of war-mongering. I'll look into Prolonging the Agony.
Churchill's ancestry looks as if it includes at least one Jew among his grandparents if I remember. Do you have a reference?
Prolonging the Agony was the second of two books on how WWI was instigated, Hidden History of The First World War by Macgregor and Docherty was the first book, it also makes excellent reading.
I have read that Churchill's mother was a New York Jewess called Jerome. Churchill sent the bombs down on Dresden on the anniversary of the burning to death of many Jewish doctors in Dresden centuries ago for their typical Jewish crimes, which had also occurred and also been discovered in Vienna for instance, with similar consequences to the Viennese Jewish doctors, many Jews were burned alive there too centuries ago, the rabbinical instruction was for Jewish 'doctors' (terrorist military operatives) working in Gentile communities to poison to death every 10th Christian patient, and of course, the 9 properly cured Gentiles would act as unwitting shills and protest the genuineness of the Jewish doctor when any deaths occurred to protect and vouch for him, but of course, when those same patients returned again and again over the years it would be like playing Russian roulette and become more obvious what was really happening.
Churchill is reported to have said "How shall we light up 600,000?", and "We shall baste them in their own fat" before the terrorist Dresden fire bombings with high incendiary devices and high explosives occurred, when the town would be packed with anywhere up to 1.25 million refugees. That would tend to support that Churchill was a Jew, he was acting exactly as a Jew would, who of course, wanted vengeance on the Germans for having discovered that Jews had been steadily murdering them all along and then punishing them, the Jews don't like that, as they consider it is their 'divine' right to do exactly as they please, and the Jewish doctors of today are engaged in precisely the same military campaign of terrorism, stopping people getting real treatment for cancer, causing more cancer with X-Rays, chemo, with antibiotics that permanently damage the immune system (6 antibiotic courses in any young woman under the age of 18 make her 3 times more likely to get breast cancer in later life, the original clinically demonstrated, proven and officially acknowledged Rife technology of the 1930's provenly cured all pathogen-related diseases and all cancers in a completely non-harmful and non-invasive way, which was suppressed by the Jewish AMA head Morris Fishbein acting under the Jewish POTUS Roosevelt), other deliberately inflicted causes of cancer are chlorine and toxic fluoride compounds in drinking and bathing water, arsenic added to cigarette paper and 600 chemicals including addicting chemicals deliberately placed in cigarette tobacco etc. etc., the Eustace Mullins book 'Murder By Injection' discusses much of this.
You have got me looking back into this issue of Churchill's mother now, some writers will obfuscate and ridicule, then some Jew will say anyone who thinks Churchill's mother was a Jewess is necessarily a 'Loonie' (a typical sign that whoever is being accused of being a loonie by the Jew is actually perfectly correct), and then you have the view which conforms with the idea of Churchill being a Jew. One link I provide reference to here, Jew World Order seems to oppose Jewish world hegemony, whilst also seeming to be highly critical of some links alleged to have existed with Hitler and the NSDAP, but also provides some good information, though I think Sefton Delmer has heavily altered 'history' so much that he has thoroughly muddied the waters in a most evilly expert way. And then another report, by a lady wearing a Star of David, says Churchill's mother really was a Jewess, and what she says is extremely cogent.
We will all have to do a bit of filtering through it all there, but Churchill was thoroughly immersed in Jewish company, his close personal friend of 30 years and principal wartime advisor Lindemann was a homosexual Jew.
Jews utterly despise Gentiles ("Even the best of Gentiles should all be killed" says the Talmud) so if Churchill had been a Gentile soul I think the Jews would have vomited him out. I do not think it is possible for a Gentile to be so daft as to be so involved with Jews without being one.
One does have to ask, if he was not actually a Jew, why on earth did he enact the Jewish agenda with such furious hatred and absolute devotion? He wanted to gas bomb all of Germany, the RAF declined his plans, likewise his desire to anthrax bomb all of Germany, which would have left much of Europe still uninhabitable today, but that action and its results would still have very totally fitted in with ultimate Jewish agenda directives, to exterminate all whites, then all Gentiles in fact.
Churchill said what had been most difficult was not how to stop the war, but how to get it started had been the most difficult thing, and once it had started, not how to stop it as soon as possible, but how to keep it going as long as possible, Rothschild-controlled 'Britain' pursued the exact same mercilessly vindictive policy in WWI, same with the Ukraine war today, the heavily Zionist 'Indian' blackface UK PM Rishi Sunak and his 80% Friends of Israel fanatically loyal Zionist mob of today have stated that they intend for the Ukraine war to be made to go on as long as possible, of course to fulfil the Jewish agenda to wipe out as many people as possible in the area, to force as many people off the area as possible in order for the Bigger Israel to be created there in line with the instructions of the late chief Chabad Lubavitcher Rabbi Menachem Schneerson years ago, and then of course, all whites are intended by the Jews to be exterminated anyway, and then, all Gentiles in the entire world, as their own rabbis in video recordings openly state to their own congregations in leaked films which are published on my site, I have possibly provided links to them before when commenting here on other occasions.
One author who claims to have done a thorough review of the evidence says Churchill's mother was definitely not a Jewess obviously does not like 'Nazis' as he calls the National Socialists, in other words, he is another criminally insane Jew-lover, who savagely criticizes David Irving for no good reason in an actually very hateful Jewish manner by stating that even if Irving told him the time, he would have to check with 5 different clocks. Any genuinely objective 'historian', if he were actually genuine, would most certainly be on the side of the Axis powers and National Socialism, and most certainly not on the side of the Jews who caused WWI and WWII and the Bolshevik Red Revolution in Russia and the communist revolution in China, remembering again, "Even the best of Gentiles should all be killed".
https://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/churchills-jewish-ancestry-not_08.php
http://myprivateselfmeandyou.blogspot.com/2012/05/jewish-churchills-mother.html
https://www.jewworldorder.org/churchill-the-cabal/
I'd like to know of some texts talking about these historical references you are making. Just to dig in. It sounds quite interesting.
HCN victims should show red skin discoloration. All the dead bodies in camp liberation films do not show this. Now granted all such original films are in b&w, so particular colors aren't discernible (red v blue). But no discoloration can be seen at all. Telling.
I didn't know about the lighter than air and corrosive qualities which render Z-B not shower friendly. Knowing some pertinent facts become weapons of counter-mythology. Learn them. Use them. I will. We must spread this kind of telling info as best we can. But w/ a caveat, we should do it, tell it w/o leaving others more wary and confused about ourselves than about the subject. Well said, Karl. Maintain dignity. Avoid excessive emotionality. Strong soldier.
Also telling that no eye-witness to mass gassings ever said they saw red bodies. Wouldn't they have, since it would be such a striking stunning sight? A couple of eye-witnesses in the Zundel trial were cross examined by defense attorney Doug Christie, and when first asked what color were the bodies they saw, they said blue and green and gray. Then Christie presented the expert knowledge of Dr. Fred Leuchter, which proved that bodies dead from HCN inhalation turned bright red. When asked again, the eye-witnesses admitted they really had not actually seen any bodies killed by HCN. Case closed!
A delicate act conveying information without condemning ourselves. It can be done. Emotional detachment is key. Dispassionate presentation of facts few have heard before. Like HCN gas floats. Talk like a scientist. No attachment either way. Ever heard of the Zundel trial? Who is David Irving? The Germans did have delousing chambers. Doubts, doubts...
Well presented
Thank you! I was able to download all of the books at archive onto adobe digital so I can read them over time when I have time.
Archive is awesome if it has all these books. I have them all in print copy which I find easier to read, but I can also read on Archive if I put it on night mode with a black background and white font. Easier on the eyes. I am going to add another link in the comment section which I should have put in the essay. Look for that too.
Great testimony - similar path and experience - I am just several books behind you.
From Ava Wolfe ...
The Grand Taboo - The International Persecution of Holocaust Revisionists
https://odysee.com/@AvaWolfe:d/The-Grand-Taboo---The-International-Persecution-of-Holocaust-Revisionists:d
I did not know this one. Someone needs to chronicle the persecution of revisionists. Jews always claiming victim status, here are innocent people victimized by Jews.
Everyone should at least read one of the main and general books from the Institue of Historical Review. And then let it rest. Being informed is one thing. Quite another to look for your house being burned down and having your family assassinated by the Anglo-Khazarian Entendre.