Unused Wonder-Weapons Lost the War and the World
The Germans' new nerve gas could have turned the tide of WWII, but it was never used. The cost to us all is still immense.
Please listen closely to this account by the world’s greatest living historian, the British David Irving. He recounts the astonishing fact that the Germans had a stockpile of 30,000 tons of a new nerve gas wonder weapon that could have won Germany the war as late as 1944—and the Allies did not know it! Winston Churchill almost ordered the bombing of German cities with the old mustard gas from WWI, which would have freed Hitler from the restrictions of the Geneva Gas Protocol (GGP) to retaliate—and swiftly win the theater in the West at Normandy France, then turn all his forces to “wipe the floor” with the Soviet Red Army advancing from the East.
Is Irving suggesting that Hitler was a more responsible, moral person because he would not break the Geneva Gas Protocol, even if it meant losing the war?
Here I will attempt some likely speculations about the implications from Chancellor Hitler withholding the order to deploy the new wonder weapon, to which the Allies had no defense.
This knowledge from irving might help restore the Fuhrer's legacy with some, but not me. My mentor and I debated this a few years ago. What was the moral transgression of breaking the GGP compared to the mass horrors and despair the loss of the war has brought us today, and perhaps for many more decades to come? The Germans could have used the gas to win at Normandy, then transfer the top 9 Panzer divisions to the East and wiped the floor with the Soviets. And gas bombing of the City of London to wipe out the Jewish banksters, or at least their base of operations.
Then—
A world Fascist/National Socialist paradise with Jews in their proper place. The Golden Age! All thrown away because Hitler was too moral to break the GGP (if that was indeed his reason). He left us with this shit hole clown world Jew world we suffer in today. If only the drunkard Jew puppet Churchill had used gas on the Germans...
Alas! This hurts my heart. Alas for our NS Golden Age! It must await a much greater prolonged misery and another cataclysmic battle before it comes again. The chance of it was only a short written order away from fulfillment. So what if 100s of 1000s of American and British soldiers were snuffed out in an instant on the French beaches? Many were going to die anyway of conventional means. And many more millions of Germans and other Europeans were going to die as they advanced off the beachheads into the interior of Europe. Billions more were to die and live in misery and despair into the future, up to today and beyond.
Imagine the terror among the Soviet Red Army as the rumors and reports of the astonishing victory of Germany using a powerful new wonder weapon in France spread to the East. Imagine the spike in morale among the German troops and their allies in the East as They learned the news. Most likely the Germans would have had plenty of gas left over from the swift victory in Normandy to deploy some against the Red Army. Even dispersed use on select enemy units would be enough to terrify the Soviet army into panicked retreat, overrunning the rearguard KGB units to contain them. Even the KGB units would run in terror at the first rumor of the new nerve gas deployed by the Germans. Stalin would have another nervous breakdown and try to hide in a bunker.
The German units in the East, supported now by the best men and equipment from the West, would begin their counter-offensive, this time wiser in enlisting the support among the liberated Ukrainian, Russian and other peoples. Plenty of the Soviet Red Army troops would most likely defect and even join the German coalition, and march on Moscow themselves.
All this would give Germany more time and resources to continue to deploy another new wonder weapon, the jet fighter plane. Renewed access to resources in the East, especially gasoline, would allow more jet fuel to run the new fighters. Even a small squadron of these super-fighters might be enough to once again defend the skies above Germany from the ruinous ongoing RAF bombing, allowing still more development of wonder weapons, including more gas and more missiles to deliver them, and more jet fighters and even bombers to strike the British air fields, depots and other infrastructure, stopping the bombing campaign at its source.
Any prolonging of the war by the use of nerve gas at Normandy could only have helped the German cause immensely. Much of the German military command's subversion and traitorous defiance of Hitler at the time was due to low morale, a feeling of certainty that Germany was going to lose the war and ongoing fighting was futile. A swift decisive victory by use of the astonishing new wonder weapon nerve gas at Normandy would have reversed much of this treason and restored loyalty to Hitler among the Wehrmacht commanders, including Erwin Rommel himself. Morale would surge to the highest levels once again while morale among Germany's enemies would plunge. Defections, surrender, even joining the enemy would sweep their ranks.
Germany was on the verge of deploying many more of its V2 rockets, and jet aircraft too. The appearance of more of these wonder weapons, given time by the victory at Normandy by use of the nerve gas, would further astonish and dismay Germany's enemies. What could Churchill do? How would Stalin react? It might have killed FDR sooner. Their astonishment and dismay would have been total. None of the Allied leaders would have known how to react, having nothing like these game-changing super-weapons and no means of defense.
Spain at the time, remaining neutral and in some ways even opposed to National Socialist Germany, may well have joined in eager alliance with Germany when Franco saw the effects of Hitler's new wonder weapons. Spain might have mobilized to secure the Straits of Gibraltar from British naval movements, as Hitler had always implored Franco to do. That itself might have turned the tide of the war at the time.
The effects of uninhibited use of the new, never-before-seen, even completely unknown nerve gas at the Normandy beaches in 1944 had every possibility of reversing the outcome of WWII, given the cascade of effects, only some of which we have considered here. And that would have rescued the entire world for the future from this Jewish dominated degenerate perverse hell scape we endure today. The 1000 Year Reich would have flourished, sharing its influence throughout Europe and the world, with the Jewish bankers and Jewish cultural marxists put into the marginal, defamed place of "Nazis" today. Imagine the world today if Germany had won!
All it would have taken was a short written order from Hitler. They had the 30,000 tons. They had the means and ability to deploy it. The Allies had no way to defend against it. War over. Germany wins. The world wins.
Alas.
FOR THOSE SEEKING A MORE CLEAR MINDED VIEW OF MACHIAVELLI'S WRITINGS BELOW IS MY REVIEW OF ANGELO BELLIOTTI'S BOOK "MACHIAVELLI'S SECRET".
REVIEW OF ANGELO BELLIOTTI’S – MACHIAVELLI’S SECRET (2015)
5.0 out of 5 stars Nearly Everything You Have Read about Machiavelli is Wrong
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on December 17, 2015
Verified Purchase
Of the many the books I have read on Machiavelli, Raymond Angelo Belliotti’s “Machiavelli’s Secret: The Soul of a Statesman” (2015) is by far the most faithful and dependable reading of what he actually wrote.
Belliotti’s book is not revisionist in the sense of re-interpreting Machiavelli. Rather, his book is a corrective look at the meaning and intent of Machiavelli’s work in contrast to all the flawed popular and academic notions of his writings. For example, Belliotti unassailably shows that: 1) Machiavelli never wrote “the ends justifies the means”; 2) never favored politics over morality except in infrequent, necessary situations; 3) advocated for absolutist ethics over consequentialist ethics, and disparaged those who judge deeds only by their results instead of their principles; and 4) never argued that pagan morality should be exclusively used in politics while Christian conventional morality should be relegated only to private life. What Machiavelli actually wrote was that one “cannot, under cover of good, do evil” (Discourses, I-page 46).
However, Belliotti does not try and gloss over Machiavelli’s political philosophy.
Belliotti sets the record straight that Machiavelli wrote something worse than “the ends justify the means” when he wrote that the end makes the means honorable and that moral men believe this. But he wrote that this is so only because the masses judge actions based on their favorable outcomes based merely on external appearances. And Belliotti points out that Machiavelli still advocated harsh, cruel measures to achieve the most highly desirable goals.
Belliotti blames not only all the pop books on evil “Machiavellianism” but on the academic works of such scholars as Leo Strauss, Harvey Mansfield, Isaiah Berlin, John McCormick and others. Which raises a question that Belliotti did not raise: were these scholars Machiavellian in their twisting of Machiavelli’s writings? Belliotti even refutes Erica Benner’s notion that Machiavelli was a serial trickster who wrote esoterically and satirically. Instead, he lays out for everyone to see what has always been in plain sight.
1. Statesmen must embrace conventional morality (Christianity) as their default position and therefore accept the absoluteness of numerous imperatives.
2. They must learn both how not to be good and how to use evil well, but only on those occasions when there is necessity to do so or an emergency that threatens the existence of the state or conventional morality. Evil well-used is reserved for founding a nation or religions, expelling foreigners to protect the state, reforming corruption, and removing obstreperous elements or immigrants as a last resort. Evil well-used is typically proportionate, quick, and furthers the common good. Conversely evil ill-used is disproportionate, recurrent, politicized, and pretends to further the common good.
Power obtained through inhumanity and evil ill-used cannot reap glory (The Prince, p. 8; The Discourses, I-p. 10). The entire theme of The Prince is to reject tyranny in favor of a republic of representative government where power of elites is shared with the Popolo (the people).
3. In such difficult situations, politicians and military leaders must get their hands dirty, but that does not excuse or justify evil. Evil ill-used is gratuitous cruelty. And no matter whether evil is well-used or ill-used, its use unavoidably results in leaders losing their souls.
“Machiavelli’s secret” is that even leaders who must use evil for greater ends have a secret inner life that can never be revealed as it would disclose leaders as weak, effeminate, and unable to use the threat of power in lieu of actual violent measures to further the common good.
Belliotti's book bogs down in his chapter on "The Problem of Dirty Hands" when he uses obscure academic language like "deontological ethics" (rule based ethics as opposed to consequentialist ethics). But the rest of the book is written very clearly and is copiously documented.
I cannot recommend this book high enough. Run to Amazon and buy it.
Read less
Another reason Hitler eschewed the use of nerve gas was that he had suffered the effects of gassing at the close of WW!. He was hospitalized w/ temporary blindness from a mustard gas attack.