I had the following correspondence with a friend and colleague, who is not yet fully Awakened to some of the truths of history (though he is keen on many of them, and is sure to arrive shortly). He is asking the right questions, and hopefully I provide sufficient answers.
I am writing to suggest it may be time to write your own book. You have your library. Hitler and Fascism is universally portrayed as the most evil in all history. Like 99.999% of all Americans I do not know the truth of the matter. My only difference from most people is that I know I don't know. I have personally witnessed the non-stop massive lying of our government as a young man to today, and also that "history" is written by the victors which looking back, I certainly experienced in government schools. I can only imagine your frustration of attempting to break open/through the minds of a totally bamboozled (from your perception) regarding Hitler society.
My leaning, prejudice if you will, is largely Libertarian and skeptical of ALL governments, particularly powerful ones such as ours and Hitler's – along the lines of "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely." It would take a lot more information than just an essay or video or two of adoring Hitler crowds for me to have a strong opinion in favor of Hitler. Again, I just know I do not know.
If I could summarize and simplify my understanding of your understanding of that era it is: Hitler saw and understood the profound evilness of the Crony-capitalism/Communist bankster NWO and tried his very best to abolish it and establish a healthy, holistic, happy society/world. I read your article in the Barnes Review but even just this last week I saw/glanced at an article claiming that Hitler rise to power was funded by our Federal Reserve Syndicate (I have to use that word for the criminal enterprise that it is). True or not? I DON'T REALLY KNOW!
Questions remain: What was Hitler's intentions? Why did he open two fronts during WWII, or were other factors involved? Was he correct in trying to stop the bankster NWO militarily rather than, say educationally? Many more questions.... He lost, but barely it appears and look at the cost! Hitler may have had the best of intentions but as the saying goes about the road to hell.....
I remain wary of concentrated power which at this point includes Hitler among the long list of other historical persons including and up to the current reprobates in Washington D.C. and Salem. The world lacks a model of what a healthy government would be like. It is no wonder that so many Libertarians lean toward anarchy which is a whole 'nother topic of what healthy "anarchism" would look like.
Does such a book already exist? Still, does it include your wide-spread topics and perceptions? How could it be written to reach the most people for the most good? Perhaps with the evil chaos the NWO has created, is creating, and intends to create it is a topic whose time has arrived. It could be dedicated to your friend and mentor. You would need a few ignorant but open people like myself to test read your book to find out what we couldn't understand or need further clarification. Yes it might take five years to write and do we have five years? You have the resources, the skills and (perhaps?) the motivation that few have.
Thank you for this.
I trust the percentage of Americans who just don't know is much less than 99% in these times. It might be 75%. Or 60%. A silent majority may at least suspect. Of those, how many know the truth? Maybe 10%? 20%? It is large and growing exponentially. We may be past critical mass.
It has been frustrating at times to help others awaken, yet also fulfilling. Many are open. Some on the email list messaged me back and asked for further resources, having begun studying Europa: The Last Battle documentary, which is widely recommended. I think it is better to start with a 1 hour lecture that lacks the dark dismal ethos of Europa.
Hitler's Place in History
Frank Herbert said power attracts the corruptible. That is why it is wisest for those who do not seek power to assume it on behalf of the nation and people. The main reason Hitler sought full power for his party the NSDAP was because both the parliamentary system and the Communist system were threatening Germany with further ruin. So the NSDAP called the Law of Plenary Powers which gave it full leadership of the nation The Law to Rescue the German People From Poverty and Misery. That is an excellent summary of Hitler's motivation for power, and something he proved during the 12 years in power. This is an excellent account. “How Hitler Consolidated Power in Germany and Launched a Social Revolution”
Likewise Franco and Mussolini. They aggressively seized power so as to protect their nation and people from the horrors of Communist rule. We need more genuine ethno-nationalist statesmen to aggressively pursue power, to displace the Neo-Communists who ruin our nations, not fewer.
I understand the adherence to Libertarianism, and its far left equivalent Anarchism (today known as Voluntarism). Such adherents cannot conceive of a national leader and party that is truly devoted to nation and people, thoroughly resistant to corruption, and competent to the level of brilliance in serving the people. Yet that is exactly what the National Socialists and Fascist governments were, and that is why perception of them has to be distorted: so that Libertarians and Anarchists/Voluntarists cannot conceive of any government being responsible and un-corrupted. Yet the best examples in history are before their eyes the whole time, only distorted into their opposite.
You provide a reasonable summary: "Hitler saw and understood the profound evilness of the Crony-capitalism/Communist bankster NWO and tried his very best to abolish it and establish a healthy, holistic, happy society/world." The only addition this needs to achieve optimum accuracy is "Jews."
Much has been presented on the funding sources for the NSDAP and Hitler generally. The Federal Reserve is a new one to me, but not surprising. Of course the Fed is Jewish from beginning to end. In fact WWII could be considered a war between National Fascists and International Jews, with nations such as the US, USSR and Britain fighting on the Jewish side, and Hungary, Rumania, Finland, Japan and others fighting on the National Fascist side. Henry Ashby Turner, no fan of Hitler, provides the best historical accounting of NSDAP funding, and concludes that no international capital reached the party, and only select German industrial sector money, for strategic reasons. His book is titled German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler. Everything else I must say is more defamation propaganda.
Also remember that unlike Stalin, FDR, Churchill and French leaders, Hitler did not use his position to enrich himself. In fact he restricted his and his party members' access to wealth, gave away some of his modest Chancellor salary at times, and only allowed himself income from a stipend on a postage stamp with his image, and sales of his book Mein Kampf. So no, the Fed did NOT finance Hitler.
You ask:
What was Hitler's intentions? Revive a healthy German society, economy and people; project it out for 1000 years with a positive eugenics program to enhance the natural positive attributes of the German people; build a defense against the horrors of Communism/International Jewry, and ultimately remove it from the world stage; encourage all of Europe to develop similar nation-states, cooperating together in a Utopian vision of a revived and thriving Europa; design and build magnificent national infrastructure and architecture, resplendant of the highest civilization. More could be said, but that's a good summary.
Why did he open two fronts? This is complex, but basically it is theorized that he held off neutralizing his British enemy in the West because he hoped to appeal to the large Peace Movement in Britain and could swing Britain into alliance with Germany. Hitler always greatly wanted peace and alliance with Britain, but the International Jews who dominated Britain insisted on War with Germany. Churchill was their war-monger agent, and Hitler knew it. Still, he held hope the peace and alliance factions in Britain (called "Hitler appeasers" by the war-mongers), including among the Royalty, could prevail. This could explain the otherwise puzzling way in which the the Germans allowed the British/French escape at Dunkirk, though that was by no means a fatal "mistake" of Hitler since those 300k soldiers did not become any future threat to Germany, and since the battle at Paris needed all resources and von Runstedt's Panzers were dispatched from Dunkirk to Paris even before the final evacuation was over. The Luftwaffe ran a few uninspired bombing and strafing runs to hurry the British/French soldiers along in their escape.
In the East however, Hitler was forced to initiate Operation Barbarossa on June 22 1941, because Stalin had brought almost the full force of his huge armies up to the border with Germany running straight through occupied (from both sides) Poland. Stalin had been encouraging the War in the West to weaken both sides while building up the world's largest armed force, oriented completely offensively, and staging it on the border with Germany. Hitler knew this, and had he waited, Stalin would have struck first and the immense Red Army offensive would have been unstoppable. By hitting them first with another pre-emptive strike, Hitler caught the Red Army not just by surprise, but on an offensive footing. The Soviets were unable to defend themselves well against the German blitzkreig, and fell back, surrendering 100s of 1000s of troops, huge stockpiles of war supplies, arms and ammunition, and vast tracts of territory. Jews at the US Treasury Department passed the Lend/Lease Act and resupplied the Soviets.
The plans of Stalin to invade Germany and all of Europe with the world's largest offensive army are well documented in Viktor Suvorov's book Icebreaker: Who Started the Second World War? In short, Hitler had to open the Eastern front or lose all. His command to launch Barbarossa delayed the conquering of Europe by 3 years, and limited it to only Eastern Europe. Jewish banksters got the rest of Europe.Was he correct in trying to stop the bankster NWO militarily rather than, say educationally? I think correct is the incorrect word. And I think this question needs more complexity. It became necessary to resist the Jew World Order militarily, something Hitler tried mightily to avoid. But Germany was forced into the war, and then it became necessary to fight it to win, or die. Some say Hitler did not fight hard enough, for instance not deploying the new nerve gas on either the Eastern or Western front, which might have been a decisive wonder weapon the Germans alone had invented. Or not launching Operation Sea Lion to seize and occupy Britain as Germany had had to do with France. Savitri Devi explores whether Hitler was a sufficient balance of Lightning and Sun in her book The Lightning and the Sun. Her conclusion: Hitler's lightning qualities fell short of the balance needed, but he was not meant to be the Final Avatar. That man, the Man Against Time, is still to come. Hitler was the penultimate.
Also, Hitler deployed other methods along with the military, including educationally. That effort was in the hands of his Minister of Information (also the Mayor of Berlin) Dr. Joseph Goebbels. In 1937 as the Jewish media and government was pouring anti-German propaganda on the British people, the German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop ordered the other Ministers of the 3rd Reich to produce reports on what exactly their ministries were doing in the areas of food and agriculture, education, economy, media, women's issues and other areas. These reports were compiled in a book in English and sent to the British for their enlightenment, to counter-act the propaganda. This book is known to us today as Germany Speaks. It is astounding to read what was going on in Germany at the government ministry level, and how positively it was affecting German society. Unfortunately it was not enough to affect enough of the British people, most likely because Jews blocked it.
Also, the Germans provided an English translation of Mein Kampf to British POWs and sent some into Britain, since Britain's Jews had distributed dis-translated copies that contained phrases against Jews Hitler never wrote in the book. This is known today as the Stalag Edition, almost the only translation I recommend (Thomas Dalton's 2 volume translation is also good with its interpretations and German language accompaniment, and the Ford Translation is acceptable).
Hitler of course also deployed diplomacy to reach his and Germany's goals, as an alternative to military. From 1933 to September 1, 1939, Hitler's diplomacy in reclaiming parts of Germany torn away by the Treaty of Versailles while avoiding any military activity was astonishing and superb. The only military activity during this time was the Wehrmacht marching into Austria with brass bands playing and people throwing flowers and waving little swastika flags to welcome them, as the overwhelmingly popular Anschluss re-unification began. Hitler also sent some units into Czechoslovakia as a peace-keeping force, invited by the President Hacha, as the unnatural construct peacefully dissolved back into its appropriate ethno-nations.
It is true that in 1936 Hitler decided to send military units into the Rhineland to occupy it after threats the French were considering invading when Hitler withdrew Germany from the League of Nations because it refused to revise the Treaty of Versailles. No conflict ensued and no military action was undertaken, other than the actual occupation. The Rhineland was of course German, but had long been an avenue of attack from France historically. Hitler had given an interview with a French radio station and newspaper the year before, expressing his desires for peace and alliance with France, but the media, influenced by Jews, withheld the interview from the public and government until after the French Parliament decided to threaten Germany.
The whole story of negotiations between Germany and Poland, with the UK and US meddling, it too long to recount here. I recommend two books to explain exactly how that conflict was orchestrated by the British--especially Foreign Secretary Halifax--the US and FDR, Poland especially Foreign Minister Joseph Beck, and even Stalin. Not Hitler. The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed by Harvard PhD David L Hoggan, and Truth for Germany: the Guilt Question of the Second World War by German historian Udo Walendy. The truth will astound you.Much more could be said about Hitler's and the NSDAP's efforts to win any conflicts educationally, without resort to military, but these examples show the general character.
I've acknowledged the rationale for distrusting concentrated power. Yet consider the Yinon Plan which the Israelis implement to break up larger nations in the Middle East into smaller ethno-states, which are more easily controlled. This is also called Balkanization, a similar process to make smaller nations in the Balkans which are less concentrated in power and easier to conquer and control. Germany required more concentrated power, not less, to prevail and usher in the Grand Europa vision. Power must be concentrated enough to prevail over the Jew World Order, and what matters is the integrity and intentions of those who are granted such power, not how much. This is why the JWO is always trying to divide and separate us, atomize people even within families and parishes, and keep power scattered. Fascists and National Socialists tried and succeeded at harmonizing all elements and sectors of society, to strengthen it against the assaults of divisive Communism. That is why the primary fascist symbol is the bundle of sticks held together with a spiraling band. In a sense it concentrates the power of individual sticks into an unbreakable bundle.
You say "The world lacks a model of what a healthy government would be like." Well, yes and no. Fascism and National Socialism is that model, and the world lacks it only because people's perception of it has been distorted to present a negative model. Obviously, if people saw it in its true light, they would want it--and that is something the Jew World Order cannot allow. Again the main difficulty people have in trusting concentrated power is that they have never seen it done responsibly. Fascists and National Socialists did it, but that is obscured and hidden. We are making it known.
A number of books such as the one you suggest I write exist in some form. I don't know if any collect the entire history and ideology in one book, but some come close. First to mind is The Myth of German Villainy by US retired (deceased) military man Benton Bradberry, an excellent summary of World War II revisionism.
For internal affairs of Germany pre-war and during, see Hitler's Revolution by Richard Tedor. Also on this sub-topic Hitler Democrat by Leon DeGrelle, who was there at the time, is excellent.
I think the book which comes closest to the one you are suggesting, a comprehensive presentation of the National Socialist ideology, history and application, is National Socialism: Our Struggle by Daniel Zakal.
It has many brief entries on many sub-topics, making it a kind of primer or beginning overview, but it is comprehensive and if not detailed enough, unbiased and accurate.
I have a growing list of books I need to write, but please know that my first book is already available. It is called Covert Covid Culprits: An Inquest Chronicle, and while it is currently on Amazon, I am recommending people get it from the Barnes Review.
https://barnesreview.org/product/covert-covid-culprits-an-inquest-chronicle/
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I am going to put this exchange on my Substack site Taboo Truth. I post there often and would be glad if you subscribe.
May I suggest a title for your book? “He Nearly Beat Us. How World Jewery Regrouped And Reorganized After WW2”
I was in the same state of incredulity as your friend and colleague barely three or four years ago and only got to the topic of WWII and Hitler via my interest in Russia (today and historically) because of the events in Syria.
You have answered all the key questions as succinctly as can be done. I will just add a few thoughts and suggestions for your friend (and mine):
• On the question as to whether “Hitler’s rise to power was funded by our ‘Federal Reserve Syndicate’” (start video at around 6:45)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2hncNoG6tiV9/
• On the point “What was Hitler's intentions?”
The best I can suggest is to read all of Hitler’s speeches (1922 to 1945) and answer this question as part of one’s own journey. To summarise, I would suggest simply, peace with equality for the German people (not superiority) which inherently involved the negation of the abominable construct known as the Diktat of Versailles (a form of Balkanisation).
• Adolf Hitler - Collection of Speeches - 1922-1945
https://archive.org/details/AdolfHitlerCollectionOfSpeeches19221945
Putting aside what we have been told may or may not have happened under Hitler, let’s look at what he said prior to and during WWII and maybe we will get an insight into what actually happened and why.
This is not a short task but should either provide all the smoking guns one is after, or drag them into question.
An audio reading might help. These can be found at Bitchute channel Jewbergstein loaded on November 23, 2021:
Part 1 of 31: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ULQX9IJ3TPJZ/
(It appears they no longer play but can be downloaded as MP3 audios and listened through your favourite audio player.)
A couple of other things Hitler is rightly accused of are the abolition of jewish-controlled usury mechanisms and society-destroying depravity including pornography.
• Rabbi Yaron Reuven - Hitler’s first two laws
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oX5OEQ2qAiYo/
Another book I would advocate is John Wear’s ‘Germany’s War’ which provides summaries of various other books chapter by chapter, including Hoggan, Suvorov and Bacque.
https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/