As coincidence wants i tripped over a book today, it is from 1938 and about the court case in Bern/switzerland on the "protocols of the elders of zion" in 1934/35....
It lists proof of evidence on both sides, but msot important is the verdict on the last page.
The judge was owned by the jews, surprise... he heared 16 of the jewish witnesses but none of the 40 aryan "pro protocol" witnesses, and jsut came to the verdict the protocols are a forgery.
Reading this i guess the protocols are no forgery, with a good chance on being authentic.
Here the link, sorry it is so long but the uploader thought its amazing to name them like that.
if you remove the pdf (from the url) you come to an amazing folder full of amazing books about the third reich and jew topic.
If you go one folder up, you can also chose german "up to 1945" (with alot books now banned in germany) and a folder "after 1945" again its all around the topic third reich and jews but in german.
Dalton's new book on the Protocols from Clemens & Blair explains the Berne trial shows the protocols are a "forgery" but that does not discredit them as a fraud. Many legitimate documents can be judged to be forgeries, yet remain legitimate and not frauds.
the Berne trial was a strategy to try and discredit the validity of the Protocols, and the verdict was presented as such--but it was not.
My point is i dont need to read a book on that subject, for me it is enough to know how rigged the court case was and that resolves it for me, i did not even read the 1938 book, the last page with the verdict was enough to know i can not trust that judge and his decision. And that was new to me, i always trusted the protocols were a forgery because it got parroted in my ears for the last 20 years i listen alternative media creator like Daryl Bradford-Smith who also always said they were a forgery.
Well, the author, whoever it was, drew much of the Protocols from Maurice Joly's book of 1864 Geneva Dialogues. It is an imaginary conversation between Montesque and Machiavelli in the underworld. It is a whole story itself how this became known, involving Alan Dulles in Turkey, a journalist named Graves, a payoff, etc.
But this does not make the Protocols a fraud. It makes it a partial forgery, yes, but many legitimate documents can be considered forgeries and still not frauds. It does suggest that the Protocols are not the notes of a meeting of the Sanhedrin or Herzl's cabal or anything.
Joly was writing about the Napoleonic regime in France, and its security state, police and control apparatus. He left the nation and was later found dead elsewhere. This is rarely mentioned. Who killed him I don't know, but the Napoleon III folks are suspected. Maybe another warning to anyone wanting to satirize or criticize the regime. Like Jews today.
Fantastic to know you are appearing with Tim Kelly on Our Interesting Times. I listen regularly to OIT. Thanks for the heads up and reading material. Looking forward to listening to this in my time zone in catch up mode.
Great presentation Karl. I will just emphasise the mention of Lesley Fry's book (around 1:15:00) by citing my own mention with these few key quotes:
France Debarred
The financial Jewish power had been transferred from Amsterdam to London under William III (of Orange).
Role of Disraeli
Under Disraeli, and inspired by him as revealed in his works, there begins loud agitation for the return of Palestine to the Jews. That gateway between the East and West must be secured and the Mediterranean become a British possession to ensure the security of Jewish trade. Gradually, Zionism becomes the pivot of British rule.
A Zionist Empire
At home, meanwhile, Jewish power gets steadily stronger, but drunk with the notion of the mighty British Empire, Britons see only the surface; they still believe that they are ruled by their own Monarch and elected men, and they fail to grasp the ghastly truth ... The Great World War even fails to open their eyes. On the battlefields of France, and afterwards in Ireland the best and most virile elements of Britain perish in order that for their British Empire which they die to defend there should be substituted the Zionist Empire. Henceforth, the history of Great Britain becomes that of Zionism.
A couple of good insights during the show! First, Ashby Turner's 'German Big Business & The Rise Of Hitler' is one of the more important works dealing with NS Germany. Unfortunately, it is not discussed enough, even amongst those supposedly "in the know."
So many, even today, try to portray Hitler and the rise of NS as: 1) a manifestation of the early stages of "monopolistic stage" of capitalism, 2) Hitler as being just another lackey of capitalism, or "big business," as were guys like Bruning, Papen, and Schleicher, 3) Hitler being a "Jewish/Rothschild's agent."
Most get lost in the abundance of false, agenda-driven diagnoses, trivialities, and the myriad of "economic causation" models. Many don't want to see the German "economic miracle" as possible being related, even partially, to what you brought-up in the interview, and was your second excellent insight I'm addressing here- a "benevolent government!"
All those libertarian arguments against the "evils of government" are, predominately, or in part, the consequences of never having understood what a "benign government" would or could look like, if properly implemented.
When I watch the old videos of the September rallies at Zeppelin Field, what I saw was national health, unity, vigor, and a promising future, not the tiresome accusations of "racism," "hate," or "white supremacism."🙄
Hitler succinctly captured this unity when he stated:
"The integration of the working class into the national community does not mean a renunciation of the advocacy of legitimate class interests. Diverging class or occupational interests are not synonymous with class division, but are the natural results of our economic life...The integration of an estate which has become a class into the national community, or even only into the state, does not take place by way of the descent of the higher classes, but by the uplifting of the lower one" - Hitler
Exactly. Almost no one can mention the economic miracle, which was no miracle at all, but the inevitable outcome of sound, practical, effective policies and programs. Simple, easy, and deliberately misunderstood.
The third great insight was when I said Hitler was a good guy. : )
I chuckled at your response - quite understandable. I do not share Sheikh Hosein's
'eschatology' in the slightest but he has a good grasp on key historical and geopolitical events. I can't recall when I first encountered Hosein but it might have been in discussion with Alexander Dugin. Try this:
• Sheikh Imran explains the situation in Ukraine to those who do not understand very clearly
• Шейх Имран объясняет непонимающим ситуацию на Украине очень доходчиво
Hi, Karl. Just listened to you on P&P. Your framework is spot on. This may sound like koo-koo cray-cray conspiracy ppl stuff, but my brother and I (who are both historians by training--and I am college prof) started piecing something together along these lines in the wake of Hillary's loss of the 2016 election after Hillary and Bill showed up in purple at their press conference. We knew it had to be a color signal. At the time, as a pro-life advocate, I was reading a lot about Carthage and baby sacrifice. And I was doing some stuff about current late-term abortion bills as just a public offering to Moloch. Then if you may remember there was that infamous email Hillary supposedly sent about a backyard sacrifice to Moloch. As an Art Historian, I was also very aware that the color purple was associated with the Phoenicians--as they made a brilliant purple dye from snails (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple). This eventually became the color of the Roman emperors, and then royalty ever after--hence the term "donned the purple." We see this in Byzantine--and then in many royal lines all over Europe--Queen Elizabeth I even forbade non-royals from wearing it. So, we hypothesized that these same people have been moving from powerful empire to powerful empire since before Christ. We had as thus: Phoenecia, Greece, Rome, Byzantium, Spain and Italy/Venice at more or less the same time--lots of evidence that the Medici were financed by them and that some popes were conversos, then Holland, then Britain, then us, and now China. Anyway, not as scholarly of a route, so it was nice to hear your research back up this hypothesis.
Amazing interview, thanks Karl!
As coincidence wants i tripped over a book today, it is from 1938 and about the court case in Bern/switzerland on the "protocols of the elders of zion" in 1934/35....
It lists proof of evidence on both sides, but msot important is the verdict on the last page.
The judge was owned by the jews, surprise... he heared 16 of the jewish witnesses but none of the 40 aryan "pro protocol" witnesses, and jsut came to the verdict the protocols are a forgery.
Reading this i guess the protocols are no forgery, with a good chance on being authentic.
Here the link, sorry it is so long but the uploader thought its amazing to name them like that.
https://archive.org/download/nslarchiv_201910/B%C3%BCcher/B%C3%BCcher_Fremde%20Sprachen/Bergmeister%2C%20Karl%20-%20The%20Jewish%20World%20Conspiracy%20-%20The%20Protocols%20of%20the%20Elders%20of%20Zion%20before%20the%20Court%20in%20Berne%20%28EN%2C%201938%2C%2021%20S.%2C%20Scan%29.pdf
if you remove the pdf (from the url) you come to an amazing folder full of amazing books about the third reich and jew topic.
If you go one folder up, you can also chose german "up to 1945" (with alot books now banned in germany) and a folder "after 1945" again its all around the topic third reich and jews but in german.
Dalton's new book on the Protocols from Clemens & Blair explains the Berne trial shows the protocols are a "forgery" but that does not discredit them as a fraud. Many legitimate documents can be judged to be forgeries, yet remain legitimate and not frauds.
the Berne trial was a strategy to try and discredit the validity of the Protocols, and the verdict was presented as such--but it was not.
My point is i dont need to read a book on that subject, for me it is enough to know how rigged the court case was and that resolves it for me, i did not even read the 1938 book, the last page with the verdict was enough to know i can not trust that judge and his decision. And that was new to me, i always trusted the protocols were a forgery because it got parroted in my ears for the last 20 years i listen alternative media creator like Daryl Bradford-Smith who also always said they were a forgery.
Well, the author, whoever it was, drew much of the Protocols from Maurice Joly's book of 1864 Geneva Dialogues. It is an imaginary conversation between Montesque and Machiavelli in the underworld. It is a whole story itself how this became known, involving Alan Dulles in Turkey, a journalist named Graves, a payoff, etc.
But this does not make the Protocols a fraud. It makes it a partial forgery, yes, but many legitimate documents can be considered forgeries and still not frauds. It does suggest that the Protocols are not the notes of a meeting of the Sanhedrin or Herzl's cabal or anything.
Joly was writing about the Napoleonic regime in France, and its security state, police and control apparatus. He left the nation and was later found dead elsewhere. This is rarely mentioned. Who killed him I don't know, but the Napoleon III folks are suspected. Maybe another warning to anyone wanting to satirize or criticize the regime. Like Jews today.
Fantastic to know you are appearing with Tim Kelly on Our Interesting Times. I listen regularly to OIT. Thanks for the heads up and reading material. Looking forward to listening to this in my time zone in catch up mode.
All the best with it Mr Haemers.
Great presentation Karl. I will just emphasise the mention of Lesley Fry's book (around 1:15:00) by citing my own mention with these few key quotes:
France Debarred
The financial Jewish power had been transferred from Amsterdam to London under William III (of Orange).
Role of Disraeli
Under Disraeli, and inspired by him as revealed in his works, there begins loud agitation for the return of Palestine to the Jews. That gateway between the East and West must be secured and the Mediterranean become a British possession to ensure the security of Jewish trade. Gradually, Zionism becomes the pivot of British rule.
A Zionist Empire
At home, meanwhile, Jewish power gets steadily stronger, but drunk with the notion of the mighty British Empire, Britons see only the surface; they still believe that they are ruled by their own Monarch and elected men, and they fail to grasp the ghastly truth ... The Great World War even fails to open their eyes. On the battlefields of France, and afterwards in Ireland the best and most virile elements of Britain perish in order that for their British Empire which they die to defend there should be substituted the Zionist Empire. Henceforth, the history of Great Britain becomes that of Zionism.
“The Jews and the British Empire” by Lesley Fry
https://juliusskoolafish.substack.com/p/the-jews-and-the-british-empire-by
I had some of these quotes in my notes but did not get the chance to share them.
Right on, Fry's booklet is loaded with such powerful succinct summaries.
A couple of good insights during the show! First, Ashby Turner's 'German Big Business & The Rise Of Hitler' is one of the more important works dealing with NS Germany. Unfortunately, it is not discussed enough, even amongst those supposedly "in the know."
So many, even today, try to portray Hitler and the rise of NS as: 1) a manifestation of the early stages of "monopolistic stage" of capitalism, 2) Hitler as being just another lackey of capitalism, or "big business," as were guys like Bruning, Papen, and Schleicher, 3) Hitler being a "Jewish/Rothschild's agent."
Most get lost in the abundance of false, agenda-driven diagnoses, trivialities, and the myriad of "economic causation" models. Many don't want to see the German "economic miracle" as possible being related, even partially, to what you brought-up in the interview, and was your second excellent insight I'm addressing here- a "benevolent government!"
All those libertarian arguments against the "evils of government" are, predominately, or in part, the consequences of never having understood what a "benign government" would or could look like, if properly implemented.
When I watch the old videos of the September rallies at Zeppelin Field, what I saw was national health, unity, vigor, and a promising future, not the tiresome accusations of "racism," "hate," or "white supremacism."🙄
Hitler succinctly captured this unity when he stated:
"The integration of the working class into the national community does not mean a renunciation of the advocacy of legitimate class interests. Diverging class or occupational interests are not synonymous with class division, but are the natural results of our economic life...The integration of an estate which has become a class into the national community, or even only into the state, does not take place by way of the descent of the higher classes, but by the uplifting of the lower one" - Hitler
Exactly. Almost no one can mention the economic miracle, which was no miracle at all, but the inevitable outcome of sound, practical, effective policies and programs. Simple, easy, and deliberately misunderstood.
The third great insight was when I said Hitler was a good guy. : )
It's up now. Looking forward to listening it.
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/tkelly6785757/episodes/2024-01-25T05_58_15-08_00
• Has Pax Judaica arrived? - Sheikh Imran Hosein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRSFq1ek1lc
I couldn't tolerate another moment of this droning gesturing sicko "wise man." Looked and sounded degenerate.
I chuckled at your response - quite understandable. I do not share Sheikh Hosein's
'eschatology' in the slightest but he has a good grasp on key historical and geopolitical events. I can't recall when I first encountered Hosein but it might have been in discussion with Alexander Dugin. Try this:
• Sheikh Imran explains the situation in Ukraine to those who do not understand very clearly
• Шейх Имран объясняет непонимающим ситуацию на Украине очень доходчиво
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM7Sya3nZMQ
Hi, Karl. Just listened to you on P&P. Your framework is spot on. This may sound like koo-koo cray-cray conspiracy ppl stuff, but my brother and I (who are both historians by training--and I am college prof) started piecing something together along these lines in the wake of Hillary's loss of the 2016 election after Hillary and Bill showed up in purple at their press conference. We knew it had to be a color signal. At the time, as a pro-life advocate, I was reading a lot about Carthage and baby sacrifice. And I was doing some stuff about current late-term abortion bills as just a public offering to Moloch. Then if you may remember there was that infamous email Hillary supposedly sent about a backyard sacrifice to Moloch. As an Art Historian, I was also very aware that the color purple was associated with the Phoenicians--as they made a brilliant purple dye from snails (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple). This eventually became the color of the Roman emperors, and then royalty ever after--hence the term "donned the purple." We see this in Byzantine--and then in many royal lines all over Europe--Queen Elizabeth I even forbade non-royals from wearing it. So, we hypothesized that these same people have been moving from powerful empire to powerful empire since before Christ. We had as thus: Phoenecia, Greece, Rome, Byzantium, Spain and Italy/Venice at more or less the same time--lots of evidence that the Medici were financed by them and that some popes were conversos, then Holland, then Britain, then us, and now China. Anyway, not as scholarly of a route, so it was nice to hear your research back up this hypothesis.