Insights continue to emerge as I respectfully debate the editors at The Occidental Observer over whether Tucker Carlson was obscuring the Jewish Issue, and is being set up to continue with even greater influence.
TOO: I totally get the idea that it was a business decision to attract larger companies and quite possibly influenced by Blackrock--which is exactly what they often do. But the idea that the plan was to make Carlson rich on some other platform in which he would be somehow controlled by Jews just doesn't work for me. Fox, the ADL, and Blackrock wanted to get rid of him because of what he was saying. Today's NYTimes has an article on their horror at a text that seemed to imply to them that he was a White supremacist ("White men don't fight like that") and they were worried it could be brought up at trial along with his other texts. And again, I think Tucker probably realizes that it's premature at best to start blaming Jews. How is that going to become a majority political movement? “
Provides link to this NYTimes article: “Carlson’s Text That Alarmed Fox Leaders: ‘It’s Not How White Men Fight’”
The discovery of the text message contributed to a chain of events that ultimately led to Tucker Carlson’s firing. For years, Tucker Carlson espoused views on his show that amplified the ideology of white nationalism.
The alleged alarming Text message:
Tucker Carlson January 7, 2021
“A couple of weeks ago, I was watching video of people fighting on the street in Washington. A group of Trump guys surrounded an Antifa kid and started pounding the living shit out of him. It was three against one, at least. Jumping a guy like that is dishonorable obviously. It’s not how white men fight. Yet suddenly I found myself rooting for the mob against the man, hoping they’d hit him harder, kill him. I really wanted them to hurt the kid. I could taste it. Then somewhere deep in my brain, an alarm went off: this isn’t good for me. I’m becoming something I don’t want to be. The Antifa creep is a human being. Much as I despise what he says and does, much as I’m sure I’d hate him personally if I knew him, I shouldn’t gloat over his suffering. I should be bothered by it. I should remember that somewhere somebody probably loves this kid, and would be crushed if he was killed. If I don’t care about those things, if I reduce people to their politics, how am I better than he is?”
(Note: The NYTimes is mostly owned and operated by Jews, the Sulzberger family. TOO knows this. TOO also knows that White nationalism, however weak and marginal, is the greatest threat to Jewish Power in America.)
KH: "It" being the agreement to part ways? If so, how explain that Fox's stock price Plunged after the ways-parting? And its ad revenue plunged as well?
I think we both have some good points here. Your view certainly has merits I find it difficult to refute. I know you said no one can become rich in media on any platform except through approval by Jews (paraphrase), so wouldn't that apply to Tucker's upcoming new platform? In my view, Fox, the ADL and Blackrock were supporting and even in some sense dictating what Carlson was saying (his father being CIA media director an unavoidable fact), then made a theater of parting ways with him. From there they recreate him in even bigger better influence--a kind of "sheepdipping" and rebranding.
Tucker may have assessed strategically it was too soon to start blaming Jews--but they blame him. The Grossberg lawsuit and the accusations that Tucker's acknowledgement of white replacement migration (even if only vote replacement) was "antisemitic" prove that Jews are blaming Carlson. But I believe that is theater. They never would have allowed Tucker to present the issues in the way he has without their prior approval.
I learned this myself when I announced I was going to devote a one hour radio show to a discussion of Zionism. Someone got to the studio before me and stole the microphones so we could not hold the show. Afterward I was evaluated by the board and my show was cancelled permanently. This was on a local community radio station. It would certainly occur on a huge main-stream platform such as Fox News Cable. Carlson would never have been able to present the topics he did in the way he did unless Murdoch and other Jews approved. Not one show. They must have approved, using it as partisan divide incitement, limited hangout (some shallow truths but not deeper ones), and controlled opposition (to the liberal left news, which Jews also control).
And then, knowing much of the public would view Carlson's reporting as dissident against official narratives, and thus hugely popular, they had to make a show of cancelling him, only to boost him to bigger fame afterward.
Alex Jones used to denounce Jews and Israel. Strongly. Suddenly that changed at one point and he focused on "ChiComms." No more criticism of Jews or Israel. Clearly the Jews got to him and forced him to obscure the Jewish Issue. The same with Carlson, only they add in a little antisemitism accusations against Carlson publicly, to keep us guessing. As E Michael Jones said, if you are not addressing the Jewish Issue, you are not relevant (paraphrase). Yes, they know this, too many people know this, and so they address it with Carlson in order to control and limit it. Grossberg complained about Christmas decorations at Fox being antisemitic? What a joke! Rubert Murdoch with a Jewish mother controlling a huge media empire on behalf of Jewish Power and Israel--that's the real antisemitic accusation Carlson will never make.
KH: Joe Atwill on with Tim Kelly, posted Friday last:
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/tkelly6785757
1:08:24
"What I'm predicting is that Tucker will become a huge part of the independent media... Tucker is very smart, and if he continues to transition, he could just do a world of good for the defense of the first amendment, and into moving the American public into identifying who the "small group of people who run the world", and what their motivation is, OR he could turn us into the cul-de-sac. So we'll see, it's going to be one or the other."
I agree, and I am firmly convinced Tucker will continue to bury narratives in the cul-de-sac, refusing to identity the small group who runs the world, obscuring the Jewish Issue. That is his role, and he is going to get better at it in his next outlet.
1:21:18
"You'll know that Tucker is legit when the first guest he has on is Tim Kelly... Well, how about E Michael Jones."
Or how about TOO editors? Not on your life, Tucker will never have on any real antisemites. He is posing as one himself, but he is not real. His apparent advocacy for White Nationalists through acknowledging replacement theory is similar to Trump saying "very fine people on both sides" at Charlottesville. They have to acknowledge such obvious issues and pander to huge voting blocks and consumer bases, while limiting the narrative away from any substantive mention of Jews. It's all there.
KH: Epoch Times (exiled Chinese nationalists) speculate on the Real reason Tucker was "fired" (after they note that the L.A. Times article said "agreed to part ways."):
Fox News BLEEDING: $500M Drop in Market Cap, $77M Advertising Revenue in Jeopardy.
If Fox "fired" Tucker to protect its ad revenue, and because Blackrock just invested up to 15% in Fox and needed to keep its profits, since Tucker was jeopardizing them with his off-topic reporting, then why is Fox's stock price tanking and its ad revenue as well? Surely Murdoch and the other Jews who decided to part ways with Tucker knew this would happen. They have their MBAs who study it all.
I disagree strongly with Epoch Times' view that Tucker was offending both the left and the right. Clearly Tucker almost always blamed, demonized, criticized and pointed out the danger of the Democratic Party, inciting hate and rage against the left. This was his main function. But this report on the dropping stock price and ad revenue of Fox since Tucker's ways-parting is telling.
It even says Tucker already has a $25M (per year?) offer from One America Network, and Epoch Times website has another story that Tucker has been offered $100M.
I'm sure Murdoch and the Fox News Jews knew this would happen. The outcome was the plan. Tucker will be greater than ever, and he will continue to obscure the Jewish Issue, as Murdoch et. al have planned.
TOO: Okay, I have a prediction--assuming he doesn't have a contract problem with Fox which I have heard. He will get a big audience and will do what he has been doing--condemning Ukraine war, calling out vaccines, dissenting on the J6 narrative, condemning censorship and the outrageous Garland DOJ, FBI, etc., going off on transgenderism and wokeness generally, talking about big media bias in the 2020 election, including Google searches, making White nationalist talking points (great replacement, immigration diluting White votes, it's all about permanent government of the left), talking about George Soros despite the ADL, and pissing off the ADL. He won't name Jews and he will continue to invite Jews on, such as Shellenberger, Beaty of Revolver News, or Berenson, but it's not hard to get the picture and if and when the ADL calls him out, he will respond as he has previously. Not ideal, but I think he has woke up a lot of people and will continue to do so. Probably not a good strategy to win political power anyway at this point.
My default position is that the easiest explanation is often the best. It doesn't require thinking he is controlled by Jews until there is better evidence. Sometimes Jews make mistakes. They are not omniscient.
And this: https://uproxx.com/viral/tucker-carlson-fox-news-contract-2024/
(It claims Tucker’s current contract with Fox could stop him from doing any other shows until after the election)
KH: Maybe yours is the best prediction. We will see. I suspect the Breitbart claim that Fox is trying to silence Tucker until after the election is agit-prop. Tucker fans will be outraged, and that is what Jewish Breitbart wants. I think the taboo topics Tucker reports on, and the way he reports on them, is driven by knowledge of these topics already circulating in the public. Tucker acts like a steam relief valve, acknowledging what the public (half of it) already knows or suspects. They need someone to acknowledge these issues, since really they are so blatant, and Tucker does it in a controlled and limited way, keeping the partisan divide inflamed in the process. Blame Democrats, not Jews. So in my view it is not so much that Tucker woke up people, but that people woke up Jewish media to the need to present and control these issues.
Maybe the simpler explanation is better. But hasn't the obvious explanation been presented as a decoy and a distraction while the real explanation goes on behind its cover? They give us the simple to hide the truth. Whenever we are being told a simple story, it is most often the lie. The truth is more complex. If Jews were omniscient they would not need to manipulate and obscure and lie to cover their mistakes. It was a mistake for Garland to prosecute the 1/6 protestors, and now Jews know it, for instance. So they are doing damage control with Carlson. That's my view. Time will tell.
TOO: I have written an article for TOO on this. Will post tomorrow. (today)
KH: Ok good. TOO surely needs to weigh in, and from the white identity/Jewish perspective.
KH: I put my essay on Tucker on my Substack site, and got this comment:
"The Jewish regime is happy with people saying anything but the full truth. Tucker serves as the right wing bookend of their permitted discourse, keeping as many Whites on the range and as Jew-naïve as possible. It's China, it's the Saudis, it's the Dems and AOC, the Woke Left, but it is never Jewish Money Power running media, finance, and government. Tucker was Kosher White Male Camouflage, and will continue being so in his next role, with his Kabbalah red string bracelet intact."
(Thank you Von West)
I fully agree.
TOO: Yeah, never the Jews.
KH: Except in a limited way they control. The grossberg lawsuit fills their need for antisemitism.
TOO: If you want, you could send me a link to your substack and I will include it.
I did. Let’s look for the TOO post today. Then we can comment.
I’m disappointed TOO would not post my own essay, since so few essays elsewhere present its views, even National Vanguard. Top NatVan editor said on his “American Dissident Voices” podcast: “As proof that the ADL gets what it wants, and what it wants is to silence anyone who inhibits the Jewish agenda of a brown America, look at what happened to populist Tucker Carlson just this week… Carlson was fired this week by mega-Zionist and possibly crypto- or part-Jew Rupert Murdoch without reason being given. Jonathan Greenblatt has been pushing for Carlson to be fired for at least two years.” Even NatVan buys it!
But as we’ve seen plenty of Taboo Truth comments agree with my view (NatVan doesn’t provide comments), and I’m sure many elsewhere do as well. We will have to get our views some attention in the TOO comment section.
Carlson's background:
http://mileswmathis.com/tucker2.pdf
Also, Mathis' Phoenician Navy theory of who really runs the world:
http://mileswmathis.com/tartar.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html