The Occidental Observer has declined to post my essay on the Tucker Carlson ways-parting with Fox News (essentially the previous essay on Taboo Truth). The editor at TOO could not credit the possibility that Tucker was obscuring the Jewish Issue, Rupert Murdoch, Jewish, knew it and is now managing Tucker’s career, and that now Tucker’s obscurantism will be bigger and bolder than ever.
Here is some of our exchange:
TOO: I liked the first part, but I just can't get into the idea that Fox is part of some big conspiracy to make Tucker even more popular than he is. It's like saying I and others got canned from Twitter so we could become more popular but continue to do what his Jewish masters tell him. O'Reilly and Megan Kelly have survived but one rarely hears about them. Was the judgment against Jones part of plot to make him more popular? If anything, Fox wanted to get more mainstream advertisers by going for a bland conservatism image--I don't recall any big pharma companies advertising with him. Mostly Mike Lindell, vitamins, and direct marketers. And I firmly believe that hatred that the ADL has for him was real. Do you really think the ADL wants what they consider white nationalist rhetoric to have any platform at all? Sorry,
(provides this link) ADL cheers Tucker Carlson’s ouster at Fox News, where he had long embraced white nationalist rhetoric
“... To the Anti-Defamation League, the firing was long overdue. The group’s leader called for Fox to fire Carlson in 2021, after the host first promoted the white-supremacist Great Replacement theory on air.
“It’s about time,” tweeted the group’s CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt, on Monday. “For far too long, Tucker Carlson has used his primetime show to spew antisemitic, racist, xenophobic & anti-LGBTQ hate to millions.”
At the time, Fox rebuffed the ADL’s petition weeks later. The network said that Carlson had actually been talking about voting rights when he outlined the Great Replacement theory, a far-right belief that attributes a diversifying electorate to a shadowy conspiracy, typically engineered by Jews, to replace white voters with immigrants and minority groups.
“A full review of the guest interview indicates that Mr. Carlson decried and rejected replacement theory,” Lachlan Murdoch, CEO of the Fox Corporation, said at the time.
The ADL’s public stance on Carlson’s employment led to criticism from the right, with Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz calling the group “racist.” Carlson also went after them on his program by parroting other white supremacist-adjacent beliefs about Israel. Last year, he gave an extended interview to Kanye West after the rapper donned a “White Lives Matter” shirt at Paris Fashion Week, but before West’s many public antisemitic rants; producers reportedly edited out antisemitic comments West had made during the interview.
KH: I understand your reluctance to post my views on Tucker. I respect the questions you raise, and have done something to answer them, though not convincingly for you. Mostly I feel TOO must post Something on the Carlson ways-parting news, since it dominates the news cycle still, and all outlets from Jewish main stream to "independent" media are speculating on the real reasons. TOO needs to contribute an analysis as well, mostly from its understanding of the Jewish Issue, especially as relates to media. Could you not say "TOO does not necessarily agree with all the views expressed by their authors, and have a partially different understanding of the complexities of the Tucker Carlson affair than Karl Haemers."?
Let me reply point-by-point here, not in any further attempt to convince you, since I accept this essay is rejected, but for a better understanding:
I just can't get into the idea that Fox is part of some big conspiracy to make Tucker even more popular than he is.
I referred to The Hill article that explains Tucker is sure to become even more popular in his next endeavor, already offered more money than he made at Fox, and will become "master of the media universe." Whether Fox at a level beyond its usual management (Scott), but at the level of Jewish oligarch Murdoch is part of a big conspiracy should not be so hard to consider, given the vast conspiracies we know nepotistic Jewish oligarchs conduct all the time. Murdoch joined with Rothschild in the Genie Energy venture, and could very well in the Tucker grooming venture.
It's like saying I and others got canned from Twitter so we could become more popular but continue to do what his Jewish masters tell him. O'Reilly and Megan Kelly have survived but one rarely hears about them.
You make a good point. This is certainly part of the debate. I would argue that Tucker was far more popular and influential than these others (including you and the many others who "got canned"). Should we really believe Fox/Murdoch would release Tucker with such popularity, without controlling his next outlet? Murdoch must know Tucker's popularity could not be curtailed as easily as O'Reilly and Kelly, but might only grow. Therefore Fox/Murdoch and the other media Jews would "can" Tucker only to maintain control of his next manifestation. They could not let him go rogue/independent. As you said, no one can be influential in media without Jewish approval. That includes Carlson's next venture.
Was the judgment against Jones part of plot to make him more popular?
Basically, yes, I would say so. I know that's hard to believe, but consider how the same attempts at judgment against Trump only made him more popular. I think they know this (certain accusations making a living martyr out of a political figure), and use it to deliberately increase the popularity of a figure they control. The YouGov graph I provide on Jones only shows his popularity steadily increasing, no matter the deplatforming, lawsuits or judgments.
If anything, Fox wanted to get more mainstream advertisers by going for a bland conservatism image--I don't recall any big pharma companies advertising with him. Mostly Mike Lindell, vitamins, and direct marketers.
I confess I did not research the advertisers at Fox. You may be right about this and I wrong. Many were saying Carlson got canned because he let RFKJ speak ill of vaccines, alienating advertising money from Big Pharma. I didn't confirm that, and neither did they from what I saw. It was just asserted that Big Pharma provides 70% of all ad revenue to media, but not necessarily to Fox.
And I firmly believe that hatred that the ADL has for him was real.
I wonder what is real and what theater in all Jewish media. I suspected the ADL's hatred for Carlson was phony back when it issued the letter to Scott demanding Carlson's firing for reporting on Republican-vote replacement migration (remember, Carlson did not say it was White demographic replacement, only vote replacement).
Do you really think the ADL wants what they consider white nationalist rhetoric to have any platform at all?
I believe that grassroots and independent media, plus mass public perception, forces main stream Jewish media to address certain issue else lose all credibility. Then they address the issues in a carefully controlled way, amounting to limited hangout and controlled opposition. They know mass non-white immigration is a huge concern for much of the American public, especially Whites. They monitor social media and know we are aware and concerned about it--so they need someone like Tucker to address it. The ADL knows white nationalist rhetoric is already widespread outside its platforms, and so has to feature it or appear too obviously obscurantist. Then they try to take control of the narrative. Tim Kelly and Joe Atwill on their latest Powers and Principalities spoke of Carlson's statement "the small number of people who run the world." Atwill said to watch Carlson in his new outlet, to see if he will go beyond his Fox rhetoric and expose Who they are and why they are running the world in this way, or steer us back into the cul-de-sac as he did at Fox. The cul-de-sac is pointing out the problem (mass non-white replacement immigration) without identifying who is doing it (Jews) and why (White genocide). This is how and why the ADL gives a controlled platform to white nationalist rhetoric through Carlson.
So yes, I believe the ADL must find some way to address the huge groundswell of awareness on essential issues among the American public. In a sense, public perception drives what topics are featured on Jewish main media, including Tucker, not always the other way around. Jews such as Greenblatt and Murdoch know this, and so seize control of the narrative, presenting such otherwise taboo topics in the way that they conceive will most likely deceive, pacify, incite and direct, deflect and neutralize public sentiment. Tucker most often blamed Democrats for the problems he reported on, not Jews. Jones began blaming Jews somewhat, but then focused on "Chi-Coms" and even said Hollywood was controlled by Saudis. This is the key, in my view: report on controversial topics such as white replacement immigration, but obscure the Jewish Issue. That above all.
The Jewish regime is happy with people saying anything but the full truth.
Tucker serves as the right wing bookend of their permitted discourse, keeping as many Whites on the range and as Jew-naïve as possible. It's China, it's the Saudis, it's the Dems and AOC, the Woke Left, but it is never Jewish Money Power running media, finance, and government.
Tucker was Kosher White Male Camouflage, and will continue being so in his next role, with his Kabbalah red string bracelet intact.
Mishna
-Lasse Karagiannis said in the name of Amalek:
"A Jew, whom you do not know anything about, may not be lowered into a pit but it is forbidden to raise him out of a pit, because we assume he might be at war with us, but we don't know for sure"
Lasse Karagiannis said in the name of Haman: "Even the best of Jews should be killed in time of war, as with the the best of snakes -dash out its brains"
https://odysee.com/@Lasse_Karagiannis:f/Criminality-of-Judaism-Forbidden-to-save-the-Non-Jew-from-death-2:f
https://www.sefaria.org/Avodah_Zarah.26a.16?lang=bi
https://www.sefaria.org/Avodah_Zarah.26b.6?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en
https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.57a.17?lang=bi