The Real Roots of "Racism"

I am in an ongoing dialogue with someone on Signal who is obviously high IQ, well educated beyond the conventional, with good recall and clear-minded. Our topic is Race. Here is some of the exchange:

KH: Another unwanted quality of dis-integrated shadow is projection. One of the major projections throughout our society, perhaps especially liberals, is racism.

WW: I read an article on liberals and racism recently that seemed to have had a similar point to yours on projection. That is liberals feel bad about other races that are not doing as well, so they call conservatives racist as a show of hollow alliance.

KH: A strange article. I didn't expect that. Other races are not doing as well because they are racially unsuited to doing well in advanced White societies. This is of course not the fault of Whites, liberal or conservative, and it not the fault of other races either. It simply is. Behind this liberal/conservative dispute over racism is Communism, which uses racial conflict to disrupt society and replace it with the totalitarian rule of a small power elite of sociopathic megalomaniacs.

WW: I don't understand. Which races are "racially unsuited to doing well in advanced White societies"?

KH: In my understanding, not only is everyone racist by nature and practicality, everyone is tribalist. The overwhelming relationship among human groups, especially conflict, has been tribal. Intervention at a racial level, especially by Whites, reduced tribal conflict in many instances. Whites had their own tribal conflicts of course, and were the only race to develop "civilized warfare," which was a significant improvement.

Abraham Lincoln had a well-defined and funded plan to repatriate blacks back to an area of Africa after the Civil War. He expressed that blacks and whites could not live well together in the same society, to the detriment of both. So he offered to move blacks to an area of what is now Liberia, which the US owned at the time, and support them in establishing their own nation. Many blacks approved and agreed. Jewish bankers and proto-Communists disagreed, because they wanted to use blacks as a disruption and weapon against the WASP establishment in the US. Later this erupted in the civil rights movement, led largely by Jews. This is one reason Lincoln was assassinated, that and his practice of issuing government currency without interest in defiance of the Rothschild Jewish bankers. Later Marcus Garvey, a black organizer, collected over 5 million signatures for a policy to repatriate American blacks back to Africa and their own nation. Many blacks approved, but Garvey was undermined and marginalized and his proposal went neglected. Blacks were too useful as a disruptive force and race conflict measure to the Communists. As early as 1928 US intelligence learned that the Soviet Communists were planning on using race conflict in America to destroy the society and seize Communist control. It appears today that they have succeeded. MLK was not an overt Communist himself, but he was trained in a Communist school and was an asset of the Communist Party in the US. His main handler, speech writer, campaign manager, fund raiser and organizer was Stanley Levison, Jewish, with direct connections to the KGB in the USSR.

Another example is Haiti. After the slave uprising was allowed to succeed, the black administration ended up destroyng the infrastructure of the nation which colonial Whites had built. The physical, moral, legal, financial, social and political infrastructure was destroyed by black infighting and tribalism. Multiple times Whites, especially the US, stepped in, rebuilt Haiti toward a modern standard, returned control to the Haitian blacks--who only destroyed it again.

This is close to the pattern of the history of civilization. Two great books, The Myth of the 20th Century and White America, both from the 1930s, explain that world wide historically, advanced civilizations are built by Whites of various tribes, at various places around the world, and eventually are destroyed by the incursion of non-white races into that civilization, including into the very family fabric of the leader class in the form of inbreeding, but also in overwhelming demographic numbers throughout the civilization. This happened to the longest-standing civilization of the near ancient world, Egypt, after 3,000 years.

The Indo-Aryans known as Hindus attempted to establish a society based on a caste system which applied legal and spiritual principles to keep the different races within the same civilization separate, but their caste system became distorted and failed eventually. Thus the end of the Hindu civilization and also the Persian empire which sprang from it.

It seems according to these historians and others, civilizations endure when they are relatively homogeneous racially, and collapse when they mix. Have you heard of the Great Replacement theory today in the US? It appears someone is deliberately trying to bring about racial conditions to collapse the current civilization and replace it with the Great Reset. Divide, conflict and conquer is an old strategy, and they are agitating it through forced race contact. I think I know who, too.

That's the short explanation of my current understanding. Much more to say of course, but a summary to your terse question. Much of this is easily misunderstood in today's "woke" world, hysterically so, but for most of human history it was common knowledge. The WEF is claiming it is trying to create a world without "racism" (or nationalism for that matter), but that is a pretext for a world without freedom.

Heather MacDonald speaks of the "Mismatch Factor," where POC students struggle academically in institutions of higher learning where they have been admitted unqualified, in order to satisfy diversity quotas. It is not good for POC students, nor for those students who are admitted qualified, to be subject to the same standards. This is a good example of the harm that ensues to both, from people racially unsuited to doing well in advanced societies.

I do not believe race is a social construct, but that social constructs are a product of race. This is much more useful to know. I'm still learning about race in history though, so this could change. But it seems an obvious truism at this point.

I'm concerned you will think I am a "racist." I hope you can have that open mind and kindness you spoke of.

WW: Obviously you have dug deep into history. I have not, but am open to learning.

KH: Yes, in the last 7 years I have been studying history intensively and extensively.
What was your understanding when you asked: "Which races are "racially unsuited to doing well in advanced White societies"?"

I think some races and sub-races can do well enough in advanced White societies, but they can't build them or maintain them. My Sicilian ancestors are some examples.

WW: My understanding was that race did not make a person unsuited for advanced White Societies. But now with the new information you provided this appears to have been the case in the time of Lincoln. Blacks themselves wanted to leave.

In more recent history, I can only draw on personal experiences or thought experiments. For example, there are poor whites in England and the American South who are not very educated who could be thought of as unsuited for doing well in advanced White societies. It is true that immigrants are often not welcome in their new countries. Pakistanis moving to poor English neighborhoods were not welcome as explained by the articulate journalist Maajid Nawaz. Although Maajid became a popular radio personality in the UK before covid.

I'd guess both of us have talked to American Blacks who are intelligent and productive members of society. I worked as a teaching assistant in an environmental science lab alongside another TA who was a Black American man married to a female chemistry professor. She did not get tenure and I was sad to see them go. There are many intelligent American Blacks like Michelle Obama who went to Princeton and got a law degree and worked as an attorney. She did well in school because her parents made her do her homework and she was given a leg up by being able to go to an elite high school near Chicago that was a long bus ride from her house. She worked hard to excel in high school so did not end up like the POC students you mention who were put in a university that they were unqualified for. It could be that poverty and parents not promoting childhood education lead more to not doing well in America than race at least after WWII. Also, current day blacks talk about the harms of Planned Parenthood and the welfare state (welfare mamas) hurting black families especially due to the loss of fathers from households.

In Haiti the Black population made up of various tribes brought there by the traumatic slave trade perhaps could not get past their violent history.

The influence of Communists in race conflict is an awful tactic. Reading the Epoch Times has convinced me of the need to rid ourselves of the CCP now, meaning this year. They have infiltrated so many institutions and bought too much US land and cannot be trusted. DeSantis' people are looking into a suspect CCP land purchase in Florida.

I do not think of you as a racist but as a seeker of the truth in the controversial topic of Jewish criminality over time.

You used the word nigger when you were talking about Black criminals near your home in Texas which gave me pause. The criminality you mentioned right next to your home was pretty awful though and not too long ago so I can understand the rawness of such an experience. I went to an inner city high school in 11th grade in Waterbury CT and know the fear of narrow escapes when living in a poor neighborhood where Whites are the minority.

KH: All this is on a bell curve. Most, not all, align racially with the type.

Some whites may seem unsuited for advanced white societies, but that is due to a lack of education, not racial qualities. With blacks on a bell curve, no amount of education will make them suited. One reason immigrants are being forced into white countries is precisely because they are not wanted. The migrant invasion of Europe and the other white nations is among the worst developments in history. It is a deliberate plan to subvert and eventually extinguish the white race. Mostly by Jews and those they collude with. They are succeeding it seems.

Something like 25% of US blacks have significant white admixture. Any black with a beard is most likely part white. My father's close friend here in AZ was formerly the Police Commander of the Chicago Police Dept at the time of Mayor Daley and the race riots. He was very critical of blacks, and when I asked him if he thought crime had anything to do with education, he said "These people don't want to learn anything!" When I asked if poverty had anything to do with crime, he said "These people don't want to work and earn money!" He had stories. Current day blacks are not the only ones talking about PP and welfare hurrting families, and not just black families. Catholics have been saying this for decades. It is a well-known Communist agenda to destroy the family as the social unit of society. They have done well in the US, for all races. The FBI used to keep crime statistics by race. No longer. American Renaissance puts out a racial crime statistics every year called The Color of Crime. It is overwhelmingly black on white crime, but our media/govt/academia complex features only white on black crime. It's crazy.

Blacks back in Africa in their natural state were just as violent and incapable of civilization as the Haitian blacks, which makes the theory of mixed traumatized tribes in Haiti unlikely. Also, traumatized whites such as the Irish were still capable of civilization, so trauma is less a factor than race.

I hear about Chinese owning land and wealth in the US. I am not sure the current Chinese are Communist, since the Gang of 4 after Mao's death in 78 was it? were themselves deposed by Deng Ming Dao, who was a nationalist. The Chinese don't allow homosexual depictions in media, take a firm hand with terrorist Uiguirs, and promote their own ethno-nationalist interests instead of globalism. This seems more Fascist and even National Socialist than Communist. But I don't really know, since the Epoch Times is produced by Chinese nationalists, right? Perhaps a rival faction?

Thank you for holding judgement. Yes, a seeker after truth, wherever it may lead. It definitely leads away from the racail nonsense the 'woke' culture is trying to feed us. CRT and defining American history by the slave trade is pure foolishness and mind rot.

Thank you for trying to understand, but my use of the n-word was not due to an over emotional reaction to an unpleasant experience. I was aware that the n-word is an almost ultimate taboo. I no longer see it that way. Blacks themselves use it all the time. My father used it at times, and it was not evil, it was not heinous, it was a common term used to distinguish and maintain ethnic identity and acknolwedge racial differences. Italians were called WOPs, dagos and guinneas, and my father used those terms too. There's coons, jiggaboos, spooks, krauts, kikes, spiks, wetbacks, poleskis, chinks, gooks, slants, sand niggers, towelheads, dotheads... Each one is consider a racial slur to refer to one specific racial type. The Jews have the most racist slur term of them all, because it refers to all peoples of all races who are not Jews: Goyim. But now the worst name anyone can be called is only partly racist but more political: "Nazi". This is inversion projection. The National Socialist Germans were among the best folks in human history, believe it or not. This can be proven.

Narrow escapes sounds scary. Blacks are more violent, which correlates with IQ. Poverty and education is not the reason. Racial nature dominates. Michelle Obama, who may actually be a man named Michael, is most likely part white. Parental forcing of homework might not explain Michelle's success, since when some black parents try to force their kids to do homework, it backfires and they do less. There is the factor in intrinsic ability and motivation. I've never lived in a place where whites are a minority. I don't envy you the experience. My Texas 'hood was bad enough, I suppose whites were a minority there. I am pretty tan myself when I get sun, so even though I identify as white (half Irish) my skin is quite brown. Definitely got my word acumen from the Irish heritage. See? It's racial! In not too many years I suppose I will be among the white minority of America, and with Jews inflaming an atmosphere of hostility and resentment toward whites, the current anti-white hatred so many blacks and other BIPOCs are expressing already can only escalate. Some Whites are already forming self-defensive enclaves such as they have to have in S Africa. Jews don't allow it and break them up. The Attorney General is Merrick Garland, Jewish, and he has weaponized the FBI against whites. Strange times.

WW: I believe migrants such as from the Ukraine to Europe and from many countries coming into the US are caused by elites who are working to install a global government.

People used derogatory names for various races pre-90s a lot more than now. I'm glad in most circles it has gone out of fashion. Calling people these old names is inflammatory and unnecessary in my mind. Even if blacks have lower IQ on average than other races and were born into poverty and a culture of gun violence, what good could come from calling them names? It's like when the globalist backers call covid medical heroes conspiracy theorists. The name calling is used to subvert instead of debate openly.

KH: It appears we have the same view of the migrant crisis. Would you agree it is a weapon to destabilize and destroy civilization as it stands and replace it with a global government? It is certainly Not about providing a safe haven for suffering displaced non-white peoples oppressed by US imperialism.
Real Ukrainians would stay and fight. Most of those fleeing Ukraine as 'asylum seekers' into W Europe are Jews, blacks, arabs and the like. Some ethnic Ukrainians too I'm sure. Plenty of Jews went to Israel and the US.

WW: Yes, I agree the migrant crisis is a weapon as you describe.

On Epoch Times NTD news the migrants from Ukraine looked mainly white women with children. I haven't been watching NTD much in the last months though so maybe that has changed.

KH: Yes I feel you are right. A campaign was initiated in the Word War to demonize "racial slurs" and guilt-trip Whites from using them, while blacks are free to use "cracker", "whitey", "honkey" and such all they like.
All peoples have used derogatory names for various races for all of time. It is part of maintaining cultural and racial separation, especially urgent for Whites. The real objective in suppressing use of this language, the expression of thought, is to break down inter-racial barriers and force race-mixing to the dissolution of the White race. This was codified in the Kalergi Plan, if you have not heard of it.
I think use of "racial slurs" actually prevents race violence. It is a kind of outlet for innate natural race competition, paradoxically a way of accepting other races without joining them. Eradicating their use only increases race tensions--which is what the Neo-Communists want. Strange isn't it that the more they try to stop racism and prevent "systemic racism," "micro-aggressions," "institutionalized racism," "white supremacy," etc., the more "racism" we have. Not strange at all.

I am wary of depictions of migrants as women and children. Fall of the Cabal did good debunking of this. I have seen depictions of Ukrainian refugees as blacks, arabs and Jews. I'm sure there are some white women and children, but why would certain media magnify this? Are they hiding the other demographics? I don't know (for sure in this case, I would add, but I have my suspicions).

That’s as far as we’ve gone so far on this complex topic of race. I appreciated her views and cogent presentation in an arena so fraught with emotion and reactionism. We are both learning. I hope you learned something too and welcome your comments and contributions here.