A colleague sent me this video, another interview with Johnny Vedmore, who did extensive research on the origins of Klaus Schwab.
Why are they hiding this about Klaus Schwab and the WEF?
In the interview, Vedmore explains that Klaus’ father Eugen worked for the National Socialist Model company Escher-Wyss, which went on to manufacture parts for the German war effort during WWII—as so many German companies with such capacity did of necessity. As did the industrial companies of all the major combatants in WWII, not least the USA with its “Lend Lease Act” supplying arms and war materials to the Communist Soviet Union. Lend Lease was drafted and pushed through Congress by Jewish Communists in the Roosevelt Administration, notably Henry Morgenthau Jr. and Harry Dexter White (Weiss) atop the Treasury Department. Leading the War Finance Board that assigned the lucrative contracts was another Jew, Bernard Baruch.
But this is about Schwab’s past and his father Eugen working at Escher-Wyss during the war. First, I posted my analysis of Schwab:
See my response to Vedmore’s analysis here:
Also, see the exchange I had with Lex Weiser of Dystopian Living, where some doubt was raised about whether Schwab’s mother was Jewish or not. I am willing to consider that the immigration records show that she was not, though the possibility that she was traveling as a crypto-Jew remains.
Now we see Redacted with Clayton Morris perpetuating the Vedmore claim that Schwab has “Nazi” connections. This video has had 631k views in 10 days, with 5235 comments, almost all positive from the ones I have reviewed.
This is in no way the only independent media spreading the view that Schwab is linked to evil “Nazis”. It is now widespread and becoming the prevailing view among the multitudes who reject main stream (Jewish) media and seek knowledge in the alternative media. Once again, stories of evil “Nazis”—operating today!—are prevailing as cover for the operations of evil Jews. Yes, this is more Obscuring the Jewish Issue in Alt Media, as I have written about in a 3 part series.
I will share my response to my colleague who sent me the Redacted video here. But first, is it not telling that Vedmore expounds at length later in the interview on the activities of Henry Kissinger installing the New World Order, or Great Reset as it is called now? Yes it is, because Kissinger is one of history’s most evil Jews—not “Nazi”. And Kissinger groomed and placed Schwab to be his Jewish Power representative over the world, whether Schwab is himself Jewish or not.
Response to a colleague, who titled his message “WEF and Klaus Schwab Exposed”:
Oh, I thought you were going to expose Schwab's Jewish connections. But no, not that!
Some analysis indicates Schwab himself is Jewish through his mother, Emma Gisela Tekelius Schwab. But that might be a misunderstanding of the immigration records.
Certainly Schwab's original mentors who set him up for the WEF were Kissinger and Hermann Kahn, both major Jews.
Forget the "Nazi" thing with Schwab. It comes from a profound disunderstanding of the Third Reich and WWII. Of course Schwab's father Eugen worked for Escher-Wyss. Why wouldn't he, Escher-Wyss was thriving along with the entire German economy at a time when most of the world, certainly most of Europe and the US, was still suffering under the Great Depression. And no, at that time Germany was not ramping up arms production, it was thriving based on peace-time economy, primarily because it had rejected loans from Jewish bankers and issued its own currency with no interest, and ejected most of its Jews from position of power in the economy, such as the Boards of the stock exchange and Reichsbank. Escher-Wyss's main industry pre-war was producing turbines for hydro-electric installations, hardly something "evil." Saying Escher-Wyss used "slave labor" because it used prisoners to support the war effort is like saying the state of Oregon uses "slave labor" to make license plates. Whether Escher-Wyss supported the German effort to develop "super weapons" to assist its defense against numerically superior enemies with superior weapons at that time, it did not succeed with "heavy water" experiments.
No one else did either. Not with "heavy water" nor with plutonium, nor uranium, nor any other fantastic substance or process. Nuclear bombs are as much a frightening phantom as evil "Nazis". Schwab's Jewish groomers and handlers Kissinger and Hermann Kahn were heavy promoters of the nuclear scare, and they rode that fear right through the 90s and on to today, profiting from the "Cold War" arms race while keeping the populations terrified of "nuclear winter", cities blown into ash by a single bomb traveling half way around the world, and a world-wide Armageddon of biblical proportions. LOL, the things we will believe when Jews and their puppets scream "Be afraid!"
So no, Schwab as evil "Nazi" is false, and not only because the National Socialist government of Germany was fighting on the side of Good against truly evil Jewish Communism in coalition with evil Jewish Capitalism. Moreso, it is a useful cover for the age-old fact that people such as Schwab, if not Jewish himself, is beholden to Jewish Power.
He could easily be both. It's established that the Wehrmacht had a not-insignificant number of Jews fighting for Germany, including Jewish *generals*. Unfortunately, while everything revisionists claim about Germany and the NSADP might very well be true, it's been propagandized to the point where trying to convince the public of anything different is IMO a mostly futile effort.
It's even been muddled and confused to the extent that Jews are fighting for Ukraine wearing Nazi iconography. There's even Azov battalion Jews with swastika tattoos praying at the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem https://twitter.com/BeardedBrownMa1/status/1517992051899514883
When the truth finally comes out (whatever that actually is), and the real history is revealed, people will be studying and discussing it for generations. I expect to be long in the dirt before that happens, however.
All that said, preparing the ground for actual history to be discussed honestly and openly is important, otherwise it can never be discussed that way.
Anyone that refuses to name the jew but eagerly pushes the 'natzee natzee' trope should never be given any credence unless they can provide airtight evidence.
The current crop of 'independent' alt media writers all fancy themselves as renegades but their willful ignorance of the kosher elephants in every room betrays their supposed sincerity.
It matters not whether Schwab is a bona fide jew. He has carried enough water for them to be considered an honorary kike a hundred times over - which automatically places him in the Morbark line!