I was on an interview once again with John Friend, editor of The Barnes Review revisionist history magazine. We discussed a few of the articles in the current edition of TBR, then spent the last half exploring my essay History of National Socialism in America Part 3. This covered a period from the early 1980s to 2002, when a significant loss occurred to the movement.
TBR HISTORY HOUR - Karl Haemers on National Socialism in America, 1980s-2000s
Everyone please share on all your networks and platforms. Likes and comments as always welcome. I have an important announcement to make tomorrow, so set notifications. See you again soon.
At least two comments I meant to make but curtailed to save time for discussion of the NS America article:
-I recently finished reading The Zionist Factor by Ivor Benson. I didn't expect to learn much new to me on the topic, but I did. It detailed the lavish supply, funding, infrastructure development, tech transfer and engineering support the US provided to the USSR throughout its existence. This included the US supplying 50% of the materials, funding, etc for the world's largest manufacturing factory of any kind, which covered 56 acres. This factory built trucks, cars, planes, motorcycles... Vehicles of all kinds.
At the time of this factory's operations, the US appeared to be in a proxy war with the USSR in Korea. The Soviets were using trucks built at the plant which the US helped to build--which would not have existed without US support--to transport troops and war supplies to the North Koreans in their war with South Korea, which appeared to be supported by the US.
The Korean war was not fought as an ideological battle between capitalism and communism. It was fought to be prolonged, each side operating both not to lose and not to win, in order to decimate the region and reap immense profits and debt to the bankers who operated above the war level as architects of the war. In the end North Korea was allowed to become a communist dictatorship to the horror and misery of its people. The US fully and openly participated in this atrocity, because at a level well above its people and above its elected officials, it was ruled by global banksters. Most of them were Jews.
The Freemasonic network was not infiltrated by the Illuminati until July 1782 at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad. This was 6 years after both the founding of the Illuminati and the US Declaration of Independence. Any prior war agitation against Britain by colonial Freemasons such as Sam Adams and John Henry must not have included Illuminati influence. It is possible some Freemasons were committed to an evil plan for world destruction and rebuilding under un-Christian principles even before the Illuminati influence. The term Judeo-Masonic may apply.
Thanks for the overview of the French 1934 Insurrection and the discussion of the Founding Fathers. I disagree that the founders were Christian. The symbol of the Roman Fasces in the US Senate chambers lead me to believe they wanted to found a Second Roman Republic - hardly a Christian republic.
Jews have successfully distorted Machiavelli as a teacher of evil instead of a defender of the Florentine Republic and an influence on Jefferson in the structuring of the founding documents (see How Florence Invented America: Vespucci, Verrazzano and Mazzei and Their Conception of the New World, by Giancarlo Masini, 1999).
Given the Jewish co-optation of American heritage and Machiavelli, this piqued my curiosity about the "evil" Karl Marx. So, I have been reading Marx's The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (the Coup De Etat of 1852 in France by Napoleon's nephew). Marx's depiction of that takeover of France could be a doppelganger of the current insurrection if only the names and places were changed to that of current circumstances in the US.
In Marx's essay he advances no ideology or propaganda for Communism, but merely explains how social class dynamics was the driver of history. He writes that France was stolen by 3 swindlers, describes election fraud, blames the bourgeoisie Aristocracy of Finance, explains how the Proletariat were framed in the courts, how cooperative banking failed, how the slogan of Property, Family and Religion was replaced with Liberty, Equality and Fraternity, how the new order was "branded as socialism", and how a new French constitution containing its own antitheses was put into place. Certainly, Marx was a hired propagandist for the oligarchs in some of this other writings, but the 18th Brumaire reveals that Marx was not a complete shill for the banking class.
Marx description of the takeover of France sound much like what happened in 2020 in the US: "It is not enough, as the Frenchmen do, to say that their nation was taken by surprise. A nation, no more than a woman, is excused for the unguarded hour when the first adventurer that comes along can do violence to her".