A Common Misconception
Yesterday I saw a comment by one smaragdus (#252) on our post on Unz Review “The Protocols Revisited.” To summarize, he said he was too intelligent than many of the other White people he knew, and this idea that Whites were of high intelligence was false. He says:
“Now people are stupider than ever, more ignorant than ever and they would believe everything the Jews (TV) tells them. Why is that? Because they are spiritually, morally and intellectually bankrupt, because they have lost the most vital knowledge, the knowledge about their mortal enemy, the Jews.”
Here smaragdus refutes his own claim that Whites are not intelligent, by giving other explanations for why Whites are subject to destruction by Jews. While intelligent, he is ignorant of the difference between stupidity (lack of capacity to understand) and ignorance (lack of accurate knowledge to understand). He closes:
“It is not worth at all to talk to people who have not read The Protocols or who at least possess some basic knowledge of The Jewish Question. Because I do not know such people I have no choice but to keep silent.”
Sharing the Taboo Truth—Wisely
I fundamentally disagree. Stupidity is different from ignorance, and Whites have the capacity to understand if knowledge is offered to them in ways they can accept. Here is how to offer knowledge to Whites so they can understand even the most controversial and taboo topics (the controversy and division has been created by the Jewish GAME Complex—government/academia/media/entertainment). It takes the form of my reply to smaragdus:
Strategy for Enlightening Whites Through Discussion
Your theory of White nature is certainly worth considering. I refer back to Goebbels’ diary quote, which rather says that Whites’ intelligence has been used against them, and our instincts have been subverted by our very intelligence twisted by the Jews.
I have a different understanding to “no choice but to keep silent.” Rather, we have no choice but to assert truth. This must be done in a particular skillful and thoughtful way. You say you are the only intelligent person you know; how would you apply your intelligence to talking to people about the Jewish issue? Keep silent? Or the Vax Issue. Or anything. Keep silent? As an intelligent person, would you agree that your conclusion does not lack intelligence, but it lacks knowledge? Wouldn’t it be counter-productive and supportive of the Jews’ plot against us to remain silent? Please consider the following approach to overcoming our hopelessness in opening discussion with other Whites, and engaging in hopeful discussion leading to their enlightenment:
10 Tactics for Conversion
1 – Always assume the other is a potential convert.
This overcomes our despair and conveys confidence to the other. Approach and enter conversation with others in the firm belief that they can learn from the knowledge we have gained. Remember always that our knowledge is a blessing to them, and we offer it in a spirit of love and care for them.
2 – Maintain respect and dignity.
They are expecting insults, threats, conflict, polarization. Deny them this and
confuse them at first with a demeanor and vocal tone of respect and mutual dignity. Most people, especially Whites, prefer to get along and cooperate and be amicable, so provide them the opportunity with our consistent manner of address. Find reasons to genuinely respect them and honor their dignity as fellow Whites.
3 – Listen as much as talk.
This is a way to convey respect. It also allows us to gather knowledge of their
views that will allow us to help them change them later. They are expecting a competition of each taking over the other. Listening diffuses this and calms them. They feel as if they are being respected—something many people have never felt, because no one has ever really listened to them. We have power in listening.
4 – Display that life in our cult is better than life in their cult.
Everyone is under the spell of Cult Programming. This includes concepts, ideas and perceptions imposed by social rewards and punishments. Cult leaders reward inductees with social benefits such as inclusion, recognition, attention, and appreciation, so long as they adopt and express the cult ideology. If they depart, they are subject to social punishments, such as disapproval, criticism, shaming, blaming, and ultimately shunning and ostracism (death at a primal level). But cults prefer to keep their members through social punishments that force them to re-adopt the cult ideology, rather than expel them. Cults are easy to get into, and hard to get out of.
Many of our original families operated in a cult-like manner. Believe the family ideology and morality, or be pressured through social punishments to return to the safe confines of the family cult. If we persist in defying the family cult, we are ostracized, disinherited, and ignored as if we don’t exist. Most of those who join cults later in life come from cult-like families. They are seeking a surrogate family in a new cult. They are hoping to resolve the issues they never could in their original families (but rarely do in new cults).
Jews know this. They have created a covid cult, a vax cult, even a Jew cult, all with narrow beliefs beyond which it is heresy to conceive. Social rewards and punishments—and even financial and physical rewards and punishments—apply to the cult members. If any persist in believing and conceiving anything outside the narrow boundaries of the cult thinking, they are expelled and ostracized.
Then those who are expelled form cults of their own. They are us. We are Taboo Truthers. We live and think and believe in a cult too. Our cult, we believe, is more enlightened, more honest, more positive, more healthy, and more hopeful of resolving urgent issues.
Extricating people we love from bad cults back into our good cults has a set of tactics all its own, but basically: Show them that life in our cult is better than life in their cult. Allow them to come to the conclusion that getting in with us will offer them more social rewards and fewer social punishments than staying in their current cult. Show them by conveying calm, care, concern, and willingness to help—because we love them. Show moments of humor. Show confidence, contentment, ease, along with genuine care for their well-being and happiness. This is irresistible to socially desperate lonely people. It may be challenging for us, because we may have a degree of social desperation and loneliness too, but we can do it and it will work. We will be less lonely when we bring those who seem lost to us back into the warm embrace of our cult-family.
5 – Always provide facts, and allow them to draw their own conclusions.
Most of those we are in discussion with have never encountered the facts we now take as obvious. They are subject to Jewish media control and content narrative limits, censorship and shadow banishment, advertising brain washing, even controlled opposition and limited hangout (COLH), and all the elaborate mass mind control the Jews inflict on our people. This is not a reason for contempt, but a reason for compassion. And motivation.
When we open the opportunity for discussion, we create an opening for new information to come to them they never have heard before. We must have this information ready and memorized, able to provide the source, clearly discuss the details. Facts are objective, and we present them in clear objective form, allowing others to respond as they will. Facts in the form of names, dates, places and numbers have a hypnotic focusing effect in conversation, and convey that our knowledge and more importantly ourselves can be trusted. We gain the influence of authority. The more detailed our facts, the better. This will be best displayed in an example dialogue at the end of this list of tactics. As always, our objective facts must be paired with the respectful, caring, agreeing, loving delivery we have already established.
6 – Understand that conversion is a process, not an event.
We must not expect to convert anyone to our cult right away, in one exchange. Plant seeds the first time, follow up later. Even introducing our facts and views to another person at all, who seems to end up more adhered to their contrary views than before, is considered a success. Resistance is a sign of weakening, a compensation against realizations struggling to get through to them. Treat resistance as a step toward success. Always leave the conversation open at the end and maintain cordial, respectful, caring demeanor. People most remember their feelings at the end of conversations, and if they are positive, they are more likely to re-engage at another time. There is wisdom in the tactic: “Always leave them laughing.” And also: Always leave them thinking, and always leave them with a warm feeling toward us.
7 – Find reasons to validate what they say.
From the beginning of the discussion, look for areas to validate their position. When we hear and see one, no matter how general or vague or distant, validate it and them by acknowledging their point. Say that we respect their passion, devotion to study and learning (yes, many of them are studying the CDC, FDA, Fox, etc.) They are trying, so honor that. Their same devotion to learning can be turned to our material as well. Say “I can understand how you arrived at that conclusion.” Validate that some of what they say is understandably currently thought to be true for them, even when it is not true for us. Later we will disagree skillfully. This will become more clear in our example dialogue.
8 – Assume and develop agreement
Enter into the discussion with an assumption that we have areas where we both agree. Stay out of polarization. Never react to insults, threats, denunciations, dismissals. Always respond with respect and concern and positive affirmation. Again, no matter how general or vague or distant, find things we both can agree on, and affirm them. It is disarming and confusing for them. They anticipate polarized conflict; don’t provide it. Provide the opposite. Assert and affirm agreement. Persist in it. Later we can introduce our differences, respectfully (without trying to make them seem stupid or even ignorant).
9 – Disagree only on facts, never on the person
Our discussions are mainly about facts, reality, truth. If we can convey them, the other can come to their own conclusions, the same ones we arrived at when we found these facts. If someone has a different “fact” than we do, that fact is no threat to us, and especially that person is no threat to us merely because they have a different factual understanding. We are confident in our facts and know their “facts” are false. They don’t know that, and our facts are threats not just to their “facts",” but to them personally. They then think—and more importantly feel—that we personally are threats to them personally.
So always convey that we personally are not just no threat to them personally, but are actually supporting and enhancing their safety through our care for them. The phrase “I have developed a different understanding” is useful. We can add when given an opening: “Can I share with you how I learned this fact? You might be interested.” More examples to follow.
10 - Any discussion is success
If they are conversing at all, it is on. When they start asking “But what about…?” questions, it’s really on. Have the answers in the form of objective facts ready. People who passionately argue their position are actually at least slightly unsure and are compensating for doubt. They are really looking for clarity from authorities better informed than themselves. Show them that we are one.
Calmly and respectfully introduce one fact counter to their position, then listen to their response. Address each point thoroughly before adding more. Sometimes it is best to stick with just one fact. Repetition throughout the course of a conversation imprints in long term memory. If we can convey even one new fact to them, it can start the process of their entire belief system on a particular issue to crumble. Prepare to rebuild with them. Express compassion for their cognitive dissonance. Remember our own struggles toward truth, and offer empathy.
Sample Discussion
We should form groups and practice these discussion in mock settings. I’ll play myself and someone else in our group can pretend to be my sister/friend/father/co-worker/etc. Practice helps a great deal during real encounters when emotions can be high, since training imprints our tactics and makes them readily available in the moment.
“Well, we both want health for everybody, right?”
“Yes, and you go around without a mask making everyone sick!”
“I can understand why you would think that. I still want you to be healthy. I have a different understanding from something I have studied. Prolonged mask wearing reduces blood oxygen levels, raises blood CO2 levels, and can have detrimental effects on cognition, stamina, organ function and immune health.”
Wait. Show we are listening.
“But what about the CDC saying we have to wear masks?”
“2 weeks ago they said we didn’t.”
“It’s different now!”
“Is it? Why should we think so?”
“Because there’s a new variant!”
“So we heard. I’m impressed you followed that news. I know you are trying to understand, and I honor that.”
“Well, I want to stay alive. I want my grandma to stay alive. You don’t.”
“I love my grandma too you know!”
(Ok at times to show self-respect and assert boundaries. They don’t want to be seen as cruel or disrespectful to someone showing them respect. Quickly move to more facts)
“Some scientists say that giving vaccines during a pandemic only creates more variants as the virus mutates in response to the vaccine selection pressure.”
(Good to use scientistic terms at times, it can be hypnotic and confers us authority status. Address shallower layers of the virus theory even if we believe something deeper, such as the no-virus theory. One step at a time.)
“Yeah, I heard that. So what about new vaccines for new variants? Mask up though, it stops the droplets.”
“Viruses are far smaller than the mesh of any mask and they say they can still get through. Do we believe they can make vaccines quick enough to keep pace with new variants? We (always use “We” “Us” “Our” when possible) just agreed that vaccinating during a pandemic creates new variants. So wouldn’t new vaccines for new variants just create more variants?”
“I don’t know. I’m wearing my mask anyway. It’s the right thing to do. You’re selfish not to wear one. You’re spreading germs.”
“We learned a new word during this pandemic: fomite. It’s an object or item that concentrates and spreads disease. Masks, especially when worn a long time and repeatedly handled with hands and fingers, are fomites.”
“This one is pretty dirty. I need a new one.”
“I’m glad you said that. We don’t need any masks though, in our understanding. We’re fine. It’s good to breathe fresh air. Good for our health. Good for immune health. I hope you at least take it down off your nose and breathe that way at times.”
“Oh yeah, all the time.”
“Glad to hear it. If you want to talk more later, contact me. I just watched a documentary about pandemics that was interesting. I’ll send you the link.”
“Polio was real, so I won’t look at anything else on that.”
“This is about pandemics in general. But did you know that only .1% of polio cases became paralysis? All those pictures of iron lungs and kids in braces, was a kind of fear propaganda. .1%.”
“Really? I never heard that. C’mon, that can’t be true!”
“I was surprised too. .1%” (Repetition to imprint on long-term memory)
“Well, stay away from people if you’re not wearing a mask.” Turns to walk away.
“We hug and kiss our people. It’s better for our immune health and keeps us safe. Stay safe!” Smile.
Truth and Tactics Will Out
Apply these strategies and talk to anyone about anything. People are desperate for genuine connection, respect and care. Give them some, and invite them out of their desperation cult into our freedom and health cult. I expect you will have a difficult time with this approach–I do–but if you apply your intelligence and your good heart, you can do it. The goal is conversion, and everyone is a potential convert. Life is so much better in our cult. Show it to others and welcome them in.
trying to talk to my daughter about vaccines is so difficult because she's been indoctrinated in college I just send her books...Dissolving Illusions and Turtles all the way down and hope she reads them...the university's are indoctrinating these kids with big pharma propaganda...and race propaganda...and homosexuality propaganda...and of course holohoax propaganda
Excellent post, Karl.
I have spent a lifetime discussing and debating the Jewish question. Most of the people I've engaged were highly educated. However, what always gave me the advantage in discussions was that I knew both sides of the argument. Before refuting them, I could often improve their own arguments with facts they were unaware of. After all, I, too, received my formal education at a university and am capable of following the mainstream narrative. Knowing the other side of an argument is imperative in such discussions. That removes the mistaken impression that you've wrapped your brain around a particular belief system and that you're the one who needs to be informed and educated. Most importantly, you won't be blindsided when confronted with verifiable information that, on the surface, refutes your own argument.
Don't waste your time with academics who are still employed. Their livelihood depends on disagreeing with you. Intelligence is no defense since the conclusions of the indoctrinated may be totally logical based on the information they have. Our greatest asset against indoctrination is not intelligence, but instinct, which is innate intelligence passed on through generations. And, like intelligence, instinct is not distributed equally among people. From my experience, how persuasive your arguments are on something like the Jewish question depends more on speaking to the good instincts of people rather than to their intelligence. Our education system works overtime to drown peoples' good instincts in out-of-context information and, at other times, by pretending that their information is scientific and objective and that no intelligent alternative explanation exists. How well they succeed in this effort depends on how strong the individual's instincts are. The sad truth is that the average person performs better in the intelligence category than the instinctual one.
Since I was a teenager, my understanding of the Jewish problem has not changed. I did not need the truth explained to me because I discovered it myself, by an instinctive understanding of what was happening. The only thing that did change was the multitude of facts and information I've since discovered in my research that supported what my instincts initially gravitated toward. After spending much time listening to and reading what the advocates of the other side's perspective had to offer, it became easy to refute their best arguments with verifiable information they were unfamiliar with, which negated their argument.