I am up to Chapter 5 of the docu-series Cult of the Medics by Whitehead.
Black Magic and Transhumanism
Allow me to remark on this. At 40:06 of Chapter 5, big letters on the screen with dire music declares:
"Fascism = The Merger of State and Corporate Power"
No. This is wrong, and it is such a common mistake that is has to be thought of as an implanted conception.
Next we see this quote: "It (fascism) is totalitarian in that it views everything as political, and holds that any action by the state is justified to achieve "the common good". The author is Johan Goldberg, in a book called Liberal Fascism.
Goldberg is no doubt Jewish.
Aside from the second quote contradicting the first, both statements are not just wrong depictions of fascism, they are knowingly wrong, making them lies. Whitehead probably did not know this, but whoever fabricated this view of fascism originally certainly did, in order to defame it.
Fascism is the use of the central state to regulate corporate power to ensure that it is beneficial to the nation and its people. British Fascist William Joyce said it best: "It is the function of government to ensure that the freedom of the few does not become the enslavement of the many." Joyce knew about Jewish bankers operating out of the City of London, and most likely he referred to them as “the freedom of the few.” This is why the Germans applied the Nuremberg Laws to give predatory Jews less “freedom” to do harm.
Yet is a sense Goldberg is right. Fascism does embrace strong actions by the state to ensure the common good of the people and nation. What is wrong with that? Nothing, but it relies on the leaders of the state being genuinely devoted to people and nation, and uncorruptible. Which the Fascist leaders of Germany, Spain, Italy and contingents in other nations largely were. They were truly Of, By and For the People, and so they used the power of the state to serve the People. Corporate power largely cooperated and participated, knowning that its own interests would be served too, as a rising tide lifts all boats. It was a cooperation between government and corporate power, the essence of Fascism throughout the many institutions and structures in which it operated. That is why the main Fascist symbol is the bundle of sticks held together with a spiraling band. Unity and cooperation of all elements, rather than division and conflict, as in the Communist model.
I often feel compelled to correct this false conception of Fascism whenever I see it--which is far too often. All of this is only the political and economic/financial aspects of Fascism. It also embraced cultural, social, and even spiritual dimensions as well. Fascism achieved the necessary fusion of the individual and collective to the benefit of both.
Thanks for the lead - I decided to watch the Cult of the Medics series - episode 5 first. Incidentally, re from 40:51 featuring Dr Carrie Madej ... https://www.bitchute.com/video/SirfPCkGJG3Y/. Her body language is very odd when asked about 'the meeting' from 44:20
Excellent points and explanation, Karl. My journey is much more recent but is a similar one. I am way behind you in terms of scope and depth and have just started to read some of your articles.
I too, went looking for an answer to the question “what is fascism?” and sought out as many articles and books as I could.
Having very much appreciated his work on the Moon Landing Hoax (Wagging the Moondoggie
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/), I procured Dave McGowan’s “Understanding the F-Word” only to be very disappointed. McGowan relies on the Webster New World Dictionary definition and interprets people and events to suit this (equally faux) definition which stresses ‘militarism’. Essentially, McGown makes a table (literally) and puts everything he considers ‘yuckie’ under the ’Fascism’ column and everything ’nice’ under the ‘Communism’ column. But to his credit, he does provide a damning exposure of and gives the dirt on each and every US President since Theodore Roosevelt – he just attributes all the ‘yuckie’ qualities to their ‘fascist’ streak.
So I then discovered Sir Oswald Mosely and read not only his autobiography “My Life” but more importantly, “Fascism – 100 Questions Asked and Answered”.
In the latter, Mosley uses the term ‘Corporation’ more in the sense of a ‘cooperative’ of like-minded or vocationally similar groups of people. He makes a distinction between these ‘social corporations’ and international capitalism/private oligarchs which he says the state must curtail, not so much work in lockstep with or be allowed to override or control the government.
Quoting from “Fascism – 100 Questions … “:
“In the autumn of 1932 the British Union of Fascists took form, with Oswald Mosley as Leader.
It was a challenge to all the most powerful forces of the established order in Britain. Mosley challenged the system of financial capitalism, by which the great banks and insurance companies had fastened their grip upon the whole economic life of Great Britain.
He challenged the expert dogma-accepted by all the "Old Gang" parties whereby the fabric of international capitalism was considered of more importance than the individual and collective well-being of the workers of Britain.
He challenged the corrupt working of the so-called democratic system, whereby party machines with colossal monetary resources were enabled to establish "caucus-regimes" utterly unrepresentative of any of the integral social elements in the country.
He challenged the so-called "free press" dominated by millionaire company-promoters who were themselves subordinate to the great financial and advertising interests on whom their revenue depended. He even dared to challenge the covert but all pervading influence of the Jews on the life of the community.”