Centinal Promise #6: Modern Eugenics 2
Continuing our look at various sub-chapters in Future Human Evolution :Eugenics in the Twenty-First Century.
Germany: “This was not what originally concerned Adolf Hitler. In 1920 he put forward a list of 25 points, none of which dealt with Eugenics. The word never even appears in Mein Kampf.”
Here author John Glad tries to show that eugenics did not concern NatSoc Germany as much as people say it did, but citing 100 books about the period, selected rather randomly. Only a few have a few references to eugenics. I scanned through the 100 books, looking at titles and publishers—and wondered if most of the publishers were Jewish owned and operated. Prentice-Hall, HarperCollins, Houghton Mifflin, Knopf and others are most likely either Jewish owned themselves or fully philo-semitic and anti-NatSoc, as are all the university presses. With such titles as: Eichman in Jerusalem a report on the banality of evil by Jewish Communist Hannah Arendt, Hitler: A study in Tyranny, The Myth of the Master Race, The Guilt of the German Army, and similar hit pieces and war propaganda, we should not be surprised author Glad is biased against NatSoc Germany.
Here is my short list of books that provide a fair and honest account beyond this list of 100 demonizing propaganda sources:
The Forced War by David L. Hoggan
Hitler’s Revolution by Richard Tedor
Hitler Democrat by Leon DeGrelle
Truth for Germany by Udo Walendy
How Hitler Consolidated Power in Germany and Launched a Social Revolution by Leon Degrelle
Mein Kampf, Stalag Edition by Adolf Hitler
What the World Rejected: Hitler Peace Offers 1933-1940 by Dr. Friedrich Stieve
German Foreign Policy by Adolf Hitler
Germany Speaks by Joachim von Ribbentrop
Hitler on the Jews by Thomas Dalton
Many more could be named, along with documentaries such as The Greatest Story Never Told, Europa: the Last Battle, Hitler’s Place in History by Mark Weber, and numerous articles by Carolyn Yeager, Thomas Dalton, Karl Haemers, and others.
While the concept of a “master race” was never officially promoted by the NatSoc government, it did investigate ancient archeology and identified ancient Aryans as builders of ancient civilizations. The NatSocs believed in Racialism, which said that each race should strive its best to bring forth its best gifts and pursue its unique destiny free from interference by other races, though mutually beneficial influence and contact was welcome. Jews and their sycophants twisted this during and after the war to portray NatSocs as “racist.” Racialism is different, even somewhat opposite, and Adolf Hitler’s acknowledgement of the accomplishments of black U.S. athlete Jesse Owens at the 1936 Berlin Olympics was an expression of his racialism (lying propaganda says Hitler snubbed Owens by leaving the stadium without a gesture, but Owens himself said Adolf Hitler waved and nodded to him, a moment of great pride for Owens).
The Jews: “Jews played a modest but active role (as they do in many movements-KH) in the early eugenics movement. In 1916 rabbi Max Reichler published… “Jewish Eugenics”… to demonstrate that Jewish religious customs were eugenic in nature. …later Ellsworth Huntington in his book Tomorrow’s Children… praised Jews as being of uniquely superior stock and explaining their achievements by a systematic adherence to the basic principles of Jewish religious law, which he also viewed as being fundamentally eugenic in nature.”
“In the Weimer Republic, many Jewish socialists actively campaigned for eugenics… Max Levein, head of the first Munich Soviet… believed strongly in eugenics.”
The Munich Soviet was a brief period in 1919 at the end of WWI when Jewish Communists took over Munich and Bavaria more broadly, and subject it to a Communist dictatorship. They were defeated in an actual war by the Friekorps (citizen militia) supported by the German government.
“…prominent German-Jewish eugenecists included… Magnus Hirschfeld… and Max Marcuse…”
Hirschfeld operated the Institute for Sex Research in Germany, which was raided by students who hauled its filthy pornographic literature into the public square and burned it, the only example of “Nazi book burning” in history. Hirschfeld went about dressed in drag under the name Aunt Magnesia. At one point Hitler declared Hirschfeld the most dangerous man in Germany, for his sexual perversion and promotion.
Max Marcuse was a member of the Frankfurt School of Social Research, which was subverting German culture through similar perverse ideologies. Marcuse and others of the Frankfurt School were forced to leave Germany, and set up similar cultural subversion in the US at Columbia University.
“In America, when the revolutionary anarchist editor of the American Journal of Eugenics Moses Harman died in 1910, Emma Goldman’s magazine Mother Earth (!) took over distribution.”
I thought Mother Earth was about gardening and environmentally friendly living. It was an outlet for communist eugenic propaganda by Jews!
“One of the most prominent eugeneticists was the American Herman Muller, whose mother was aJewish and who received the Nobel Prize in medicine in 1946… A communist, Muller spent 1933-7… at Moscow University, when he wrote a letter to Stalin proposing that the Soviet Union adopt eugenics as an official policy… In 1932 Muller had spent a year in Germany and he was outraged by Nazi concepts and policies concerning race.”
Small surprise, that. The NatSocs were no doubt outraged by Jewish Communist concepts and policies concerning race, most outrageous being Jewish Supremacy.
“Dr. Joseph Meir… wrote in 1934: ‘… for us (Jews), eugenics in general and mainly the careful prevention of hereditary illnesses, has a much higher value than in other nations.”
Why? Because Jews are more important as a race than any other. Jewish Eugenics was far worse than any NatSoc concepts.
“Dr. Max Nordau, the son of an Orthodox Rabbi, was converted to Zionism… Nordau’s ideas, which included vigorously propagandizing eugenics, became so popular in the Jewish community that Nordau Clubs were created even in the U. S.”
Evil Jews promoting race eugenics far outdid the NatSocs in their racial supremacy madness. NatSocs were in fact Racialist, but Jews were racist.
“Dr. Arthur Ruppin, the head of the World Zionist Organization office in Palestine, wrote in his book the Socialogy of the Jews that “in order to preserve the purity of our race. such Jews (showing signs of genetic defects) must refrain from having children.”
Horrors! Jewish racial purity? Such supremacist, arrogant racist evil.
“In Israel today many eugenic practices have become widely accepted.”
But in Germany they are widely condemned by Jews. Chutz-pocracy.
“There are now more fertility clinics than in any other country in the world (4x the number per capita in the U.S.)… Thus the government is actively pursuing eugenics.”
“In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer are preferred by some Rabbis as a form of fertility treatment that does not violate the literal Halakhic precepts against adultery.”
Of course not. Jews must breed their master race, and religious law be damned. Well no, it can go along gracefully for scientific transhumanist eugenic breeding.
“The Israeli attitude toward cloning differs considerably from that prevalent in most countries. …the Chief Rabbinate of Israel sees no inherent contradiction in reproductive cloning as a form of treatment for infertility…”
Palestinian reproductive rates exceed Israeli, and too few Jews in the “diaspora” want to move to Israel, so they have to do everything to “treat infertility,” even controversial cloning of human beings. Yet Jews do their utmost to impair the fertility of other races, especially Whites at this time.
“A program of individualized eugenics… would seem to be consistent with an attitude that was, at the very least, tacitly endorsed by traditional Judaic teachings. Should it make a difference if the means for producing fine offspring are no longer determined by moralized speculation but instead by evidence-based genetic science?”
Not to Jews. But let Germans try to apply “evidence-based genetic science,” and a great kvetching breaks loose.
This concludes our assessment of John Glad’s Future Human Evolution of 2006 compared to Lothrop Stoddard’s The Revolt Against Civilization of 1922. The goals and aims of eugenics then and now are essentially the same, though the means have advanced scientifically with genetics. I approve of such approaches applied to improve the human stock physically, mentally and morally, and reduce suffering. Maybe if the science of eugenics can improve the moral stock of Jews, it will amount to a Final Resolution of the Jewish Issue. But I doubt it.