Euphoria means good feeling. Utopia means good place. Euphony means good sound. And Eugenics means good breeding.
Nature is naturally eugenic. When rams butt their horns against each other in a dramatic male dominance ritual, they are determining to a fine degree which is the stronger. The winner breeds with the ewes, and passes on the strongest traits. This is eugenics. When DDT is sprayed in the underdeveloped world to control malaria, only the strongest 5% of mosquitoes survive. They breed back the entire population, only this time they are stronger. The malaria plasmodium they carry is also stronger, and so native people who have developed a natural defense against otherwise debilitating malaria, a sickle-cell adaption of their blood (the plasmodium reproduces inside blood cells, but not if they are sickle-shaped), are no longer able to resist the stronger plasmodium. This is a form of eugenics.
Organisms breed stronger traits among their species in response to stressors in the environment, so long as those stressors are kept with in a certain range. If the stressors are too strong—such as malnourishment or mass die-off of the strongest members, as in dangerous hunts for canine packs or warfare for humans—the effects are dysgenic and the population becomes weaker. Nature is always in a balance between eugenics improving the population, and various natural forces of dysgenics degrading the population. In ideal conditions and over time, eugenics wins out and the population improves, becoming stronger, faster, longer-lived, more resistant to disease, more beautiful, more fertile and wiser.
When male wolves engage in ritual competition to see which is the strongest, an Alpha is selected. The Alpha male wolf then identifies the female Alpha, who has gone through her own selection process among the female wolves. The two Alphas court and breed pups, who have the best genetics. Even among the litter of pups a competition begins, and Alphas are selected from the youngest age. The strongest pups nurse more, and later the parents give the best and most food to the Alpha pups first. In good environmental conditions for wolves, the parents feed and nourish all the pups, though not always equally. In bad conditions, they prioritize and feed the Alpha pups, neglecting the Betas, Thetas and others. Nature is relentlessly and constantly eugenic at every opportunity. It is instinctual in all organisms.
Human beings engage in natural eugenics whenever they select each other to breed based on beauty, health and competence. We have also used our neo-cortex brain to consciously apply eugenics (remember, it means good breeding). Since as a species human beings have a neo-cortex which other mammals don’t, this conscious application of eugenic principles could be seen as instinctual as well. Most of the modern industrialized nations were considering and applying conscious eugenics in the 1920s and 30s, including though by no means exclusively Germany. World War II interrupted these programs, and had an immense dysgenic effect, especially on the losers of the war, Germany and Japan.
This too was by design. The British had always had a “balance of power” policy toward the European continent, suppressing any nation that waxed too powerful, and building up any nation that waned in power and could not check more powerful ones. This policy was applied not just ot the nation as an entity, but to the population’s inherent genetics. The British maintained the blockade after World War I in order to starve Germans, in violation of the surrender terms—Wilson’s 14 Points—imposing a dysgenic effect that rippled down the next generations. The British also imposed a dysgenic effect on the Irish during the so-called “Irish Potato Famine,” which was in fact a genocide by starvation. It slaughtered over 5 million Irish or forced them to leave the island, imposing a drastic dysgenic effect on the Irish population.
When the British power elite felt threatened by the superior eugenic qualities of other populations, such as the industrious inventive Germans or the high intelligence and productivity of the Irish, they applied a dysgenic policy to those population in order to reduce or remove their competitive edge.
Communists applied the same dysgenic strategy. It is a standard practice after Communist revolution to slaughter off the “best and brightest” among the subject population in a bloodbath of heinous mass murder, labeling them “bourgoise,” “capitalists,” and “aristocracy.” That this included priests and nuns, artists, intellectuals and others who posed no direct threat to the new Communist dictatorship was of no consideration. They were eugenic, and thus had the potential to conduct “counter-revolution.” Their eugenic qualities had to be removed from the population in a dysgenic campaign of execution. From the hatchet-men executioners up to the Ideologue Communist dictators themselves, many were Jews.
Germans and other modern leaders perceived, rightly, that modern civilized conditions can promote dysgenic populations. Christian charity and support for the poor encouraged dysgenic breeding, increasing the degenerate population, while other conditions supported lesser breeding among eugenic types (so-called high input parenting). Modern agriculture, medicine, hygiene and general abundance supported dysgenic population breeding that would never have occurred in a natural environment.
Germans and some other nations, including the U.S., were of course applying such eugenic practices as euthanasia of hopelessly sick and injured people, sterilization on a case-by-case basis at the decision of medical boards assessing such inherited traits as insanity, violent tendencies, criminality, and imbecility (noting a correlation between IQ and criminality. Significantly, it was the Church that complained on moral grounds, and Hitler and the Germans discontinued the program), as well as support financially, morally, culturally and ideologically for healthy families and their fertility. Yes, this included encouraging Aryan marriages, just as the Irish would encourage Celtic marriages, and the British Anglo-Saxon marriages. Mixed breeding outside the genetic group was known to produce dysgenic offspring, and was discouraged in favor of in-group breeding (with sufficient population diversity to prevent in-breeding, which is also dysgenic). Europeans have by far the greatest internal diversity as evident by the range of eye colors, hair colors, skin tones and other traits. They have a fine population for eugenic breeding, and only decay their genetic potential with breeding among non-Europeans. This they knew in the 1920s and 1930s.
Germans and such eugenic practices were demonized immediately after the War (and indeed before and during by hypocritical U.S., Soviet and British war propaganda), in favor of the openly and deliberately dysgenic influences we suffer under today. Race mixing, promotion and even celebration of such dysgenic types as homosexual men, retarded people and other birth defective people, the handicapped, the severely chronically ill and injured people, combined with demonization of eugenic Whites and glorification of relatively dysgenic BIPOCs (black/indigenous/people of color) who historically never even invented the wheel, are all dysgenic practices promoted today.
Just as the Germans and Irish were targeted by the British, and other national populations were targeted by Communist Jews, for dysgenic treatment, so Whites as a whole are targeted for dysgenic treatment and eventual eradication by Jewish Supremacists. These Jews believe they are the eugenic peak of racial supremacy, “God’s Chosen People,” and must eradicate any potential competitor—Whites. We are in a race war, and Jews appear to be winning against Whites, using BIPOCs as shock troops and cannot fodder, inciting them against demonized, guilt-tripped Whites.
Humans appear to be the only species capable of deliberate dysgenics, although in this case is it truly a case of Jewish eugenic supremacy against White Aryans? Some of my knowledge here comes from the book The Revolt Against Civilization: the Menace of the Under-Man by Lothrop Stoddard, published in 1922. He speaks of a kind of morally dysgenic but intellectually eugenic sub-set of the population, the most dangerous type, the leaders of Communist revolutions. Lenin (Ulyanov) and Trotsky (Bronstein) come to mind.
“…it is the high grade defectives who are most dangerous to the social order. It is the ‘near-genius,’ the man with the fatal taint which perverts his talents, who oftenest rouses and leads the mob. The leveling social revolutionary doctrines or our own day, like Syndicalism, Anarchism, and Bolshevism superficially alluring but basically false and destructive, are essentially the product of unsound thinking—by unsound brains.”
- pp. 86-7
Stoddard does not say so (his index has only 3 entries in 225 pages), but he is describing certain Jews. Today they also lead the degenerate media, porn industry, corrupt government, evil banking cartels, drug dealers, transgender promotion, and all the not just dysgenic but truly degenerate forces afflicting our society. It is leading rapidly and inevitably to the destruction of our civilization itself.
Unless. White Aryans may remember their eugenic place among the tribes and races, and restore a functioning eugenic society. At least they may counter the dysgenic effects of Jewish influences, and achieve a stasis for a time. Such is the natural interplay of eugenic and dysgenic forces. The pendulum swings, and as things get worse, conditions for their improvement also grow. They had best grow stronger soon.
Utopia actually means "no place". The word was created to satirize the idea that such a idealized place of perfection free from the shackles of reality could actually exist.
Most of this is sound thinking, kudos. I'll add some comments, if I may.
* The Bolshevist dysgenic program was not only committed against whites, but also notably carried out in China and Cambodia. Pol Pot was explicit to kill non-apparatchiks who wore glasses, on the theory that they bought the glasses to read books.
* High profile 'regime critics' such as James Corbett continously push the mantra that the elites are pushing a eugenics program; He doesn't consider that the trillion dollars in 'aid for africa' and the welfare state are demonstrably dysgenic.
* The sars-cov-2 and gene-transfection plandemic has the fingerprint of ethnic bioweapon, as the ACE2 receptor binding affinity varies strongly between races; notably lowest in the K26R ACE2 variant prevalant among Ashkenazi.
* The Gene jab selects to kill high-trust, high-cooperation phenotypes, which would be an ethnic characteristic of whites and asians. Ironically that does leave the best of them (who can see through the plandemic lies) unscathed.
* The federal reserve debt and tax-systems are dysgenic punishing saving, preventing middle and working-class accumulation of wealth. This is the cohort of heatlhy and productive people who generate value via work. They become improverished with a wealth and procreation power transferred to tax leeches (elites, the invaders and the unproductive).
* The people of Yaweh's covenant are the forefathers of the european nations. And this is historical fact. We are called caucasians because a lot of us came to europe over the Caucasus mountains. More on the proofs the Israelites were white (ant not jews) here: https://christogenea.org